«CREATING ALTERNATIVES: A PARTICIPANT OBSERVER’S REFLECTIONS ON THE EMERGING LOCAL FOOD SYSTEM IN KANSAS CITY* MARY HENDRICKSON UN IVERSIT Y OF M ...»
THE EMERGING LOCAL FOOD SYSTEM IN KANSAS CITY 185on the praxis of everyday life—everyone eats, every day if they can—this was an explicitly political vision in that it tried to create strong social relationships in the personal sphere that could resist the dominant economic and political forces in the food system. These were personal habits and relationships that eaters were asked to change, with the idea that such changes could have large impacts outside the personal sphere.
On the other hand, farmer groups like Ozark Mountain Pork cooperative and Good Natured Family Farms started in the economic arena by trying new business models. However, they relied on the informed eaters created by the Kansas City Food Circle and other movements for a market for their products, a market based on the belief that supporting these farmers was good for the local economy, the local environment and local communities. With their livelihoods at stake, farmer groups are under more pressure from the current economic arena to pursue a business model that makes money, and are less able to venture into the social and political arenas.
With the creation of the local food policy coalition under the auspices of KC Healthy Kids, actors in the food system in Kansas City are again explicitly in the political arena because we are pursuing policy changes at the local, state, and federal levels that could change the structure of agriculture and food systems. This partnership brings together (and is spearheaded by) eaters, including a focus on institutional consumers, farmers, policy makers, academics, and advocates. The subtle influences of the Missouri School can be seen here in that advocates grasp the larger picture—just as the Kansas City Food Circle did—that the agrifood system as currently organized has been harmful to the land, the environment and farmers, and by extension to eaters (children and families), workers, and the communities, rural and urban, in which we live. Because we have used the framework of the organization of the global agrifood system, we can help explain the changes taking place and what kinds of interventions may be necessary.
In the end, there are many cracks, many vulnerabilities and spaces within the current structure of the agrifood system in which to locate and position alternatives.
The pragmatic approach that Bill Heffernan and I have adopted demands that we help farmers, workers, and eaters find the opportunities that are apparent in Table 2, and help them achieve those opportunities. As we move toward Alternative Food Systems that are personal, fair, and sustainable, the movement will hit some bumps.
Eaters will buy locally-produced food from farmers who are not out to change the structure of agriculture; some consumers will decide to buy local or organic food simply because it tastes better or because they believe it is healthier rather than 186 SOUTHERN RURAL SOCIOLOGY because it is a political statement. However, there are opportunities here to help farmers, eaters, and workers to move from the idea of what makes money or is convenient to the explicit political and economic ideas of change. Because food is something that we engage with every day, people around the world are creating something different in the food system simply by their acts of everyday praxis.
Every new relationship created in these spaces may not lead to change. Creating these new relationships and using our agency to change the food system may fail.
The cracks and spaces that we see for action may be overwhelmed by the power accumulated by dominant actors in the food system over the last few decades. The point is that in Kansas City, like many places across the world, we are moving in fits and starts toward something that could be transformational—socially, economically, and ecologically. It is not guaranteed this transformation will happen, but the essence of the Missouri School is the belief that change is possible. To paraphrase Cornel West, we may not be optimistic that change in the food system will happen in the next five years, but we hope real transformation will come because hope is about being part of the struggle, about working toward change.
REFERENCES Albee, Robin, J., Sanford Rikoon, and Jere Gilles. 1996. New Farmer Networks and the University. A Case Study of Missouri’s Green Hills Farm Project. Report from the University of Missouri, Department of Rural Sociology.
Allen, Patricia. 2004. Together at the Table: Sustainability and Sustenance in the American Agrifood System. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
Allen, Patricia and Julie Guthman. 2006. “From ‘Old School’ to ‘Farm-to-School’:
Neoliberalization from the Ground Up.” Agriculture and Human Values 23(4):401–15.
Anderson, Barb B. 2003. “Building Brands from the Barn Up: Heritage Acres Finds Success in Local Approach.” Agrimarketing 41(10):34–9.
Bonanno, Alessandro, Lawrence Busch, William H. Friedland, Lourdes Gouveia, and Enzo Mingione (eds). 1994. From Columbus to ConAgra: The Globalization of Agriculture and Food. Lawrence, Kansas: University of Kansas Press.
Bonanno, Alessandro and Douglas H. Constance. 2000. “Powers and Limits of Transnational Corporations: The Case of ADM.” Rural Sociology 65(3):440– 60.
_______. 2006. “Corporations and the State in the Global Era: The Case of Seaboard Farms and Texas.” Rural Sociology 71(1):59–84.
Bookchin, Murray. 1990. Remaking Society: Pathways to a Green Future. Boston:
South End Press.
THE EMERGING LOCAL FOOD SYSTEM IN KANSAS CITY 187Briemyer, Harold F. 1965. Individual Freedom and the Economic Organization of Agriculture. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Burch, David. 2007. “Private Equity and the Food Retail Sector: Three Case Studies.” Presented at the annual conference of the Agri-food Research Network, November 26–29, University of Queensland, Australia.
Carey, Edward, Katherine Kelly, Mary Hendrickson, Dan Nagengast, James Quinn, Craig Volland, and Lala Kumar. 2006. “The Growing Growers Training Program: An Apprenticeship Program for Market Gardeners Serving Kansas City.” HortTechnology 16:439–43.
Carstensen, Peter. 2000. “Concentration and the Destruction of Competition in Agricultural Markets: The Case for Change in Public Policy.” Wisconsin Law Review 2000(3):531–46.
_______. 2004. “Buyer Power and Merger Analysis—The Need for Different Metrics.” Paper prepared for the “Workshop on Merger Enforcement” sponsored by the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission.
Washington, D.C. February 17. Retrieved May 30, 2008.
Constance, Douglas H., Anna M. Kleiner, and J. Sanford Rikoon. 2003. “The Contested Terrain of Swine Production: Deregulation and Reregulation of Corporate Farming Laws in Missouri.” Pp. 76–95 in Fighting for the Farm: Rural America Transformed, edited by Jane Adams. University Park, PA: University Press of Pennsylvania.
Constance, Douglas and Mark Russell. 1999. “A Crisis, a Change, a Future.” Final project report from “Developing Sustainable Hog Markets and Slaughtering Arrangements for Family Farmers in Missouri” to the Osage Independent Pork Producers Association.
Dahlberg, Kenneth. 1994. “Food Policy Councils: The Experience of Five Cities and One County.” Paper presented at the Agriculture, Food and Human Values Conference, June 11, Tuscon, AZ.
DeLind, Laura. 2006. “Of Bodies, Place and Culture: Re-situating Local Food.” Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Ethics 19:121–46.
DeLind, Laura and Jim Bingen. 2008. “Place and Civic Culture: Re-thinking the Context for Local Agriculture.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21:127–51.
DuPuis, E. Melanie and David Goodman. 2005. “Should We Go ‘Home’ to Eat?:
Toward a Reflexive Politics of Localism.” Journal of Rural Studies 21:359–71.
188 SOUTHERN RURAL SOCIOLOGY Endicott, Diana, Matt Jonas, and Otavio Silva. 2007. “From Farm to Fork: A New Model of Supply and Demand.” Presented at the Kellogg Foundation’s Food and Society Networking Conference, April 25, Phoenix, AZ.
Friedland, William. 1984. “Commodity Systems Analysis: An Approach to the Sociology of Agriculture.” Research in Rural Sociology and Development 1:221– 35.
Friedmann, Harriet and Philip McMichael. 1989. “Agriculture and the State System.” Sociologia Ruralis 29(2):93–117.
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Goodman, David and E. Melanie DuPuis. 2002. “Knowing Food and Growing Food: Beyond the Production-Consumption Debate in the Sociology of Agriculture.” Sociologia Ruralis 42(1):5–22.
Goodman, David and Michael Redclift. 1991. Refashioning Nature: Food, Ecology, and Culture. London: Routledge.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hatanaka, Maki, Carmen Bain, and Lawrence Busch. 2006. “Differentiated Standardization, Standardized Differentiation: The complexity of the Global Agrifood System.” Pp. 39–68 in Between the Local and the Global: Confronting Complexity in the Contemporary Agri-Food Sector, edited by Terry Marsden and Jonathon Murdoch. London: Elsevier Ltd.
Heffernan, William D. 1972. “Sociological Dimensions of Poultry Production in the United States.” Sociologia Ruralis 12(3/4):481–99.
_______. 1984. “Constraints in the U.S. Poultry Industry.” Pp. 237–60 in Research in Rural Sociology and Development: Focus on Agriculture, edited by Harold Schwarzweller. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press Inc.
_______. 1998. “Agriculture and Monopoly Capital.” Monthly Review 50(3):46–59.
Heffernan, William D. and Douglas H. Constance. 1994. “Transnational Corporations and the Globalization of the Food System.” Pp. 29–51 in From Columbus to ConAgra, edited by Alessandro Bonanno, Lawrence Busch, William Friedland, Lourdes Gouviea, and Enzo Mingione. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
Heffernan, William, Mary Hendrickson, and Robert Gronski. 1999. Consolidation in the Food and Agriculture System. Washington, DC: National Farmers Union.
Hendrickson, Mary K. 1997. “The Kansas City Food Circle: Challenging the Global Food System.” PhD Dissertation, Department of Rural Sociology, University of Missouri. Columbia, MO.
THE EMERGING LOCAL FOOD SYSTEM IN KANSAS CITY 189_______. 2003. “Finding Friends in the Food System: A Midwestern Case Study of Value-Added Agriculture.” Presented at the Association for the Study of Food and Society and the Agriculture, Food and Human Values Society, joint meetings, June 7–10, Austin, TX.
Hendrickson, Mary K. and William D. Heffernan. 2002. “Opening Spaces through Relocalization: Locating Potential Resistance in the Weaknesses of the Global Food System.” Sociolgia Ruralis 42(4):347–69.
_______. 2007. “Concentration of Agricultural Markets.” University of Missouri.
Retrieved August 6, 2007 (http://www.nfu.org/wp-content/2007heffernanreport.pdf).
Hinman, Kristen. 2008. “The Pope of Pork: In Tiny Towns Across Missouri, OldSchool Hog Farming Stages a Comeback.” Riverfront Times, November 25.
Hinrichs, C. Clare. 2003. “The Practice and Politics of Food System Localization.” Journal of Rural Studies 19(1):33–45.
Hogeland, Julie. 2006. “The Economic Culture of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives.” Culture & Agriculture 28(2):67–79.
Ikerd, John. 1993. “The Need for a Systems Approach to Sustainable Agriculture.” Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 46(1/4):147–60.
Ikerd, John, John Kerd, Dick Levins, and Nancy Thompson. 1996. “Evaluating Relative Impacts of Conventional and Sustainable Farming Systems on Rural Communities.” USDA Sustainable Research and Education Report. Retrieved June 1, 2008 (http://www.sare.org/reporting/report_viewer.asp?pn=LNC92ry=1996&rf=1).
International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology. 2008. Global Summary for Decision Makers. Retrieved April 30, 2008.
Jaffe, JoAnn and Michael Gertler. 2006. “Victual Vicissitudes: Consumer Deskilling and the (Gendered) Transformation of Food Systems.” Agriculture and Human Values 23:143–62.
Kellogg Foundation. 2008. Overview of Food and Society Program “What Do We Mean by Good Food?” Retrieved January12, 2009 (http://www.wkkf.org/default.aspx?tabid=75&CID=19&NID=61&Languag eID=0).
Kirschenmann, Fred, Steve Stevenson, Fred Buttel, Thomas Lyson, and Michael Duffy. 2003. “Why Worry about Agriculture of the Middle?” Retrieved on June 6, 2006. (http://www.agofthemiddle.org/papers/whitepaper2.pdf).
190 SOUTHERN RURAL SOCIOLOGY Kloppenburg, Jack Jr., and Neva Hassanein. 2006. “From Old School to Reform School?” Agriculture and Human Values 23: 417–21.
Lind, David Hilty. 2007. Encounter on a Home-Delivered Raw Milk Route. PhD Dissertation, Department of Rural Rural Sociology, University of Missouri.
Long, Norman and Ann Long. 1992. Battlefields of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
Lyson, Thomas. 2004. Civic Agriculture: Reconnecting Farm, Food and Community.
Boston: Tufts University Press.
Lyson, Thomas, G. W. Stevenson, and Rick Welsh. 2008. Food and the Mid-Level Farm: Renewing an Agriculture of the Middle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marsden, Terry and Jonathon Murdoch (eds). 2006. Between the Local and the Global: