WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«INCOME INEQUALITY: FROM NATIONAL TO GLOBAL IDS 81650. CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK GRADUATE CENTER Instructor: Branko Milanovic Spring semester 2014 ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

To determine the laws which regulate

distribution is the principal

problem in Political Economy.

David Ricardo (1817), Principles of

Political Economy (Preface)

“..of the tendencies that are harmful to sound

economics, the most seductive, and …the most

poisonous, is to focus on questions of distribution.”

Robert E. Lucas (2004),

The Industrial revolution: past and future

INCOME INEQUALITY: FROM NATIONAL TO GLOBAL

IDS 81650.

CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK

GRADUATE CENTER

Instructor: Branko Milanovic Spring semester 2014 Office hours: Tuesdays 3 to 5 Class:Wednesdays, 6:30:8:30 January 29-May 14 (no classes: Feb 12, April 16) Final: week of May 19 Email: bmilanovic@gc.cuny.edu or branko_mi@yahoo.com Twitter: @BrankoMilan Inequality: A topic that came in from the cold The central subject of the class is income inequality. Inequality has become a much more important topic in the press, social networks and academic publications over the last three or four years. This resurgence of interest is particularly striking in the United States where, because of the ideological dominance of the Chicago school of economics, the topic was considered irrelevant and “soft.” It was thought that only people mistrustful of markets or personally envious would care about inequality.

Growth would ultimately improve everybody’s standard of living.

This position was a sharp departure from almost 200 years of economics’ concern with the questions of distribution, which Ricardo thought should be “the principal topic in political economy.” The Chicago model of economics has obviously been proven false as it bequeathed the West the sharpest economic crisis since the 1930s. To better understand inequality, it is necessary to review the historical evidence, 1 and empirical and theoretical work on the topic. It is also important to realize that – despite the fact that it was during several decades an “underground topic”—there exists an important and sizeable body of knowledge.

The course is divided into three parts. The first part (covering approximately one- halfof the class), looks at inequality within nation-state, using both some theory and empirics. This was, and still remains, the dominant and the most important type of income inequality. We start with a brief review of several key theories of personal income distribution. Interest in personal income distribution goes back to about 100 years ago, and is thus relatively recent compared to the interest in the functional distribution of income (between labor=workers, capital=capitalists and land=landowners).

Since inequality is mostly about the empirics, theories of personal income distribution were heavily inductive. We start with Vilfredo Pareto who was the first economist to have seriously studied inter-personal income inequality. We continue with Simon Kuznets’s famous inverted U curve which is still the workhorse of inequality economics (although it was defined 60 years ago), and complete with the views of several contemporary authors, in particular Thomas Piketty as expressed most clearly in his new book Capital in the 21st century.

After a review of theories, we shall look at the past 30 years which have seen a steady and, at times apparently unstoppable, rise in inequality in about 2/3 of the countries worldwide. We shall review regional evidence, starting with the rich world, and then going over transition countries and the developing world. Particularly interesting, because it is bucking the trend, is the decrease of inequality in highinequality countries like Brazil.

In the second part, we broaden the perspective: from studying within-national inequality, we move to a study of global inequality. This is an empirical area of a much more recent vintage, for two reasons: the data to study global inequality were not available until about 20 years ago, and it takes a certain “cosmopolitan” or “globalist” outlook to begin thinking about inequality among all human beings rather than within one country. In this part, we shall address three issues: (1) how is global inequality calculated and what are the methodological challenges faced in such a huge exercise, (2) what are the empirical results, and (3) what can political philosophy tell us about the relevance and importance of global inequality.

At the very end of the class, we shall try to address the thorny issue of “what next.” It seems clear today that (i) the rigid neoclassical approach has failed, and that (ii) there is broad dissatisfaction with the existing high inequality. But what can be done?

What policies, at national and global level, can be used to effect change? Will tax on financial transactions help? Or global tax on capital? Can individual countries do it alone by, for example, raising top income tax rates? Why the public accepted marginal tax 2 rates of 90% only three decades ago and cannot imagine them today? Will inequality between countries make migration pressure greater and migration politically less sustainable? Why has the political reaction to the increased income inequality been so muted (compared with the 1930s)? Can a growing global “middle” class coexist with the dwindling (hollowed out) middle classes in rich countries? Finally, and perhaps most importantly, will greater income inequality “spill into” greater wealth inequality and inequality of opportunity?





Here, we enter into an area for which there are relatively few new contributions, and where we are unlikely to provide strong answers. Several recent books, blogs and articles try to move our thinking forward. We shall discuss some of them in class.

Every class will have a “dedicated” ½ hour during which we shall discuss current inequality issues as they happen. Students are encouraged to think of the issues they would propose for discussion (and if nobody does propose anything, I will draw on my “reserve issues”). Participation in discussion in that part (as in the rest of the class) will be the basis for the participation part of the grade.

There would be a shorter mid-term exam, and a longer (2-hour) final exam. Both will be administered in class. The grading weights will be as follow: class participation 30%, mid-term 30%, final exam 40%.

The amount of required readings (denoted by letter R) is not huge (approximately two readings per week). Other papers listed in the syllabus are important papers from the area, and may be useful for students who decide to pursue a given topic further (whether in this class or another one). Only things covered in class and in required readings may be included in the mid-term and final exam.

Required book: Branko Milanovic, The haves and the have-nots: a brief and idiosyncratic history of global inequality, Basic Books, 2011.

–  –  –

Angus Deaton, The great escape: health, wealth and the origins of inequality, Princeton University Press, 2013.

Thomas Piketty, Capital in the 21st century, Harvard University Press, 2014.

–  –  –

1.1 Some theory: From Pareto to Kuznets to Piketty (6 readings) [R] Essay I (“Unequal people”) and vignette 1.10 (“Two students of inequality: Vilfredo Pareto and Simon Kuznets”) from The Have and the Have-nots.

[R] Branko Milanovic, “Globalization and inequality”, Introduction to the volume of selected readings, B. Milanovic (ed.), Globalization and inequality, Edward Elgar, 2012.

Available at http://econ.worldbank.org/projects/inequality (pp. xii-xviii only).

Brian Snowdon, "Towards a unified theory of economic growth: Oded Galor on the Transition from Malthusian Stagnation to Modern Economic Growth", World Economics, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. April-June 2008, pp. 97-151.

[R] Branko Milanovic (2014), “Return of patrimonial capitalism: Review of Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the 21st century”, Journal of Economic Literature, June 2014, forthcoming. Available at http://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/52384/1/MPRA_paper_52384.pdf.

A special issue of Current History, “Inequality on the Rise: A Current History Anthology”, September 2012-May 2013, vol. 111, No. 746-Vol. 112 No. 754. In particular papers on China (Martin King Whyte), Russia (Daniel Treisman), and Africa (Shantayanan Devarajan and Luc Christiaensen).

Background: Seminal works: Pareto, Kuznets, Tinbergen and Piketty Vilfredo Pareto, Cours d’économie politique, Lausanne, 1896.

Vilfredo Pareto, Manual of Political Economy, translated by Ann S. Schwirr, New York:

Augustus M. Kelley, 1971. Originally published in French in 1906.

[R] Joseph Persky, “Retrospective: Pareto’s Law”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol.

6, No. 2 (Spring), 1992, pp. 181-192. Available at http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1257/jep.6.2.181.

John Creedy (1997), “Pareto and the distribution of income”, Review of Income and Wealth, pp. 405-411.

G. Findlay Shirras (1935), “The Pareto Law and the Distribution of Income”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 45, No. 180 (Dec., 1935), pp. 663-681 4 Jan Tinbergen, Income Distribution: Analyses and Policies, Amsterdam: North Holland,

1975. Review in [R] Robert H. Haveman, “Tinbergen’s ‘Income Distribution: Analyses and Policies’—A Review Article”, The Journal of Human Resources, vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 103-114. Available at http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/145601?uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103394429833.

[R] Simon Kuznets (1955), “Economic Growth and Income Inequality”, American Economic Review, vol. 45, No. 1, March 1955, pp. 1-28. Available at http://www.aeaweb.org/aer/top20/45.1.1-28.pdf Thomas Piketty, (2003), “Income Inequality in France, 1901-1998”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 111, no 5, 2003, pp. 1004-1042.

Thomas Piketty (2014), Capital in the 21st century, Harvard University Press.

1.2 National inequalities in the current era of globalization Main theme: How much and why within-national inequalities increased in the last thirty years 1.2.1 Developed world (3 readings) [R] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Divided we stand,

Paris: OECD, 2011. Only the summary:

http://www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/49499779.pdf.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Growing Unequal?

Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD countries, Paris: OECD, October 2008.

Available at http://www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/growingunequalincomedistributionand povertyinoecdcountries.htm.

James K. Galbraith, Inequality and Instability: A Study of the World Economy Just Before the Great Crisis, Oxford University Press, 2012 (chapter 6).

Giovanni Andrea Cornia, Tony Addison and Sampsa Kiiski (2004), “Income Distribution Changes and Their Impact in the Post-Second World War Period”, in Inequality, Growth, and Poverty in an Era of Liberalization and Globalization, Chapter 2, UNU-WIDER and Oxford, UK and New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 26–54.

5 Andrea Brandolini and Timothy M. Smeeding (2006), “Patterns of Economic Inequality in Western Democracies: Some Facts on Levels and Trends”, Political Science and Politics, 39 (1), January, 21–26.

Andrea Brandolini and Timothy M. Smeeding (2007), “Inequality Patterns in WesternType Democracies: Cross-Country Differences and Time Changes” in P. Beramendi and C. J. Anderson (eds.), Democracy, Inequality and Representation, New York, Russell Sage Foundation. Available at http://www.wiwiss.fuberlin.de/forschung/veranstaltungen/rse/PapersSS08/Democracy.pdf?1353071391.

Andrea Brandolini, “A bird’s eye view of long-term changes in income inequality”, Banca d’Italia, mimeo, 1998.

[top income shares literature] [R] Alvaredo, Facundo, Anthony B. Atkinson, Thomas, Piketty, and Emmanuel Saez (2013), “The Top 1 Percent in International and Historical Perspective”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 27, no 3, pp. 3-20.

Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez (2006), “The Evolution of Top Incomes: A Historical and International Perspective”, American Economic Review, 96 (2), May, 200–205.

Thomas Piketty, “Top Income Shares in the Long Run: An Overview,” Journal of European Economic Association, vol. 2-3: 1-11, 2005.

Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, “Income inequality in the United States, 1913 Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 1: 1-39, 2003.

Burkhauser, Richard V., Shuaizhang Feng, Stephen P. Jenkins and Jeff Larrimore (2012), “Recent Trends in Top Income Shares in the USA: Reconciling Estimates from March CPS and IRS Tax Return Data”, Review of Economics and Statistics, May, vol. 94, no. 2, pp.

371-388.

[R] Miles Corak (2013), “Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 27, no 3, pp. 79-102.

1.2.2 Transition countries Sebastian Leitner and Mario Holzner (2008), ‘Economic Inequality in Central, East and Southeast Europe’, Intervention: European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies, 5 (1), pp. 155–188. Available at http://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/ejeep/5ejeep.2008.01.11.xml.

6 Branko Milanovic and Lire Ersado, “Reform and inequality during the transition: An analysis using panel household survey data, 1990-2005”, World Bank Working Paper No.

4780, November 2008. Revised version published in Economies in Transition: The LongRun View, edited by Gerard Roland, Palgrave, 2012, pp. 84-108.

1.2.3 Developing world (incl. China) (3 readings) [R] Facundo Alvaredo and Leo Gasparini (2013), “Recent trends in poverty and inequality in developing countries”, Universidad Nacional de la Plata, Documento de Trabajo No.

151, November 2013. Available at bit.ly/18URSGs.

Leonardo Gasparini, Guillermo Cruces and Leopoldo Tornarolli (2011), “Recent Trends in Income Inequality in Latin America”, including comments by Daniel Mejía and Daniel E.

Ortega, Economia: Journal of the Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association, 11 (2), Spring, 147–201 [R] Ravi Kanbur and Xiaobo Zhang (2005), “Fifty Years of Regional Inequality in China: A Journey through Central Planning, Reform, and Openness”, Review of Development Economics, 9 (1), February, 87–106. Earlier version available at http://www.kanbur.dyson.cornell.edu/papers/Halfcentury81.pdf.



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Research in Business and Economics Journal Mobile technology adoption for microfinance delivery in SubSaharan Africa Alice S. Etim Winston Salem State University ABSTRACT Low income communities in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have unsatisfied demand for financial services. Despite the fact that microfinance institutions (MFIs) are emerging, these communities continue to have large unbanked populations who lack access to any form of microloan and other banking services. Ghana, Nigeria and other SSA...»

«Apresentação das Bolsas do Governo Chinês A fim de promover a compreensão mútua, bem como boas relações e desenvolver os intercâmbios e as cooperações em vários campos entre a China e os outros países, o governo chinês oferece bolsas de estudo para apoiar os melhores alunos, professores, estudantes internacionais para estudar e efectuar pesquisas nas universidades chinesas. O Ministério da Educação da China confia à China Scholarship Council (daqui em diante ‘CSC’) a...»

«LI FENG (Updated: April 22, 2015) Department of Finance and Economics Email: lf20@txstate.edu McCoy College of Business Administration http://lifeng.wp.txstate.edu/ Texas State University Phone: (512) 245-8462 601 University Drive Fax: (512) 245-2547 San Marcos, TX 78666 POSITION AND EMPLOYMENT 2012-present Brandon Dee Roberts Assistant Professor of Economics, Texas State University 2014-present Adjunct Economist, RAND Corporation 2009-present Affiliated Researcher, National Center for Analysis...»

«Bermuda in the World Economy: Economic Relations with Asia, Canada, Europe and the United States 2014 Prepared Exclusively for the Government of Bermuda TRANSNATIONAL ANALYTICS LLC Washington, D.C. June 2015 Government of Bermuda June 2015 BERMUDA IN THE WORLD ECONOMY – 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary Note on Terminology in the Study II. Overview of Bermuda’s Economy III. Bermuda and the World in Summary IV. Bermuda and North America: United States and Canada UNITED STATES...»

«FINANCING PROMISING EVIDENCE-BASED PROGRAMS EARLY LESSONS FROM THE NEW YORK CITY SOCIAL IMPACT BOND Timothy Rudd Elisa Nicoletti Kristin Misner Janae Bonsu December 2013 Financing Promising Evidence-Based Programs Early Lessons from the New York City Social Impact Bond Timothy Rudd, MDRC Elisa Nicoletti, MDRC Kristin Misner, NYC Mayor’s Office Janae Bonsu, MDRC December 2013 This report is made possible through funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies. Dissemination of MDRC publications is...»

«DONALD R. LESSARD Epoch Foundation Professor of International Management, Emeritus MIT Sloan School of Management 100 Main Street E62-460 Cambridge, MA 02142-1347 Tel: 617-253-6688 Fax: 617-253-2660 E-mail: dlessard@mit.edu Academic Advisor, The Brattle Group, Cambridge, MA Member, Global Infrastructure Project Research Network Fields: Global strategy, major projects, and energy. Current research: Dynamic capabilities in global strategy; Global dynamics of development, production, and...»

«International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences July 2013, Vol. 3, No. 7 ISSN: 2222-6990 Impact of Spiritual Intelligence on the Staff Happiness (Case Study: Golpayegan Petrochemical Company) Dr.Ali Nasr Isfahani Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Administrative sciences and Economics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran Hamideh Nobakht Master of Business management.Islamic Azad University,Mobarekeh Branch, Isfahan,Iran DOI:...»

«Information Disclosure, Cognitive Biases and Payday Borrowing Marianne Bertrand (University Chicago Booth School of Business, NBER, CEPR and IZA) Adair Morse * (University of Chicago Booth School of Business) First Version: March 2009 This Version: July 2010 Abstract We study whether additional, psychology-guided information disclosure induces payday borrowers to lower their use of high-cost debt a field experiment at a national chain of payday lenders. We find that information that helps...»

«Faculty Process for Determining Market Loadings 2013 1 Context Consistent with the Faculty’s mission and vision, Market Loading is a mechanism to aid the Faculty in attracting high quality applicants, and in retaining existing high quality staff who are in demand elsewhere. This document outlines the process for applying Market Loadings within the Faculty of Business and Economics. This document should be read in conjunction with the University’s guidelines for Private Paid Outside work for...»

«Impact Investing* Brad M. Barber bmbarber@ucdavis.edu Graduate School of Management University of California, Davis Adair Morse morse@haas.berkeley.edu Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley & NBER Ayako Yasuda asyasuda@ucdavis.edu Graduate School of Management University of California, Davis September 8, 2016 * We are grateful for Philip Bond, Will Gornall, Tim Jenkinson, Oğuzhan Karakaş, Hideo Owan, Ludovic Phalippou, Elena Pikulina, Josh Rauh, Berk Sensoy and the...»

«THE PRODUCTION OF SPACE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF URBANITY: INFORMAL PRACTICES in 1930s ANKARA A Ph.D. Dissertation by SEHER ŞEN Department of Political Science and Public Administration Bilkent University Ankara December 2008 THE PRODUCTION OF SPACE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF URBANITY: INFORMAL PRACTICES in 1930s ANKARA The Institute of Economics and Social Sciences of Bilkent University by SEHER ġEN In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE...»

«International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies Vol. 3, No. 2, 94-101, 2016 e-ISSN: 2226-4809/p-ISSN: 2304-6945 The Effective Strategies in Companies’ Performance Using the Partial Least Squares Approach 1 Saed Adnan Mustafa 1 Business Administration Department Sur University College, Oman ABSTRACT Strategies have become important in companies in recent years to improve their companies performance this strategy has create a worthy interest on Public listed companies....»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.