FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials

Pages:     | 1 | 2 || 4 | 5 |   ...   | 7 |

«ABSTRACT We present evidence that financing frictions adversely impact investment in workplace safety, with implications for worker welfare and ...»

-- [ Page 3 ] --

To get a sense of the relative variation of injury occurrence in our sample, we calculate between- and within-group variances at the establishment-, firm-, and industry-level. Table IV reports these variances.

–  –  –

One takeaway from this table is that injury rates are not simply an industry-specific effect. Rather, they actually vary more on a within-industry basis than across industries, though we note that our industry definitions are fairly coarse. As Table III shows, there is considerable variation across industries as well. Another takeaway is that, while there is more variation in injury rates across establishments than within establishments, there is considerable variation within an establishment over time. The standard deviation of injuries per employee within an establishment is 2.0% (for comparison, the mean number of injuries per employee over the full sample is 4.13%). This level of variation gives us power to identify the determinants of injuries even after controlling for establishment fixed effects.

III. Empirical Determinants of Injury Rates

In this section, we examine the determinants of workplace injury rates. We do so primarily by estimating fixed effects regressions of Injuries/Hour on establishment- and firm-level characteristics, with a focus on those characteristics previously shown to relate to a firm’s ability to finance investment. Our main regression specification is Injuries/Hourit = αi + δjt + γst + βxit + (1) it, where t indexes year, i establishment, j industry, and s the state in which the establishment is located. The vector xit consists of establishment-year and firm-year variables, including those relating to financing. Establishment fixed effects αi account for any time-invariant omitted establishment characteristics, industry-year fixed effects δjt for any time-variation in injury risk at the industry level (perhaps due to the evolution of production technology or industry growth), and state-year fixed effects γst for any state-level time-variation in injury 14 risk (perhaps due to changes in the local labor environment or safety laws).

Table V presents results from estimating equation (1). Standard errors clustered at the firm level are shown in parentheses below each point estimate in this and all subsequent tables presenting regression results. Column (1) presents results without any fixed effects, column (2) results with only establishment fixed effects, and column (3) results with all of the fixed effects. Note that the number of observations decreases from 43,371 in column (1) to 25,053 in columns (2) and (3) because the inclusion of establishment fixed effects limits us to establishments appearing in the sample at least twice.

— Insert Table V here — Column (1) shows that, without fixed effects, injury rates are positively related to Debt/Assets, significant at the 5% level, and negatively related to Cash/Assets and CashF low/Assets, significant at the 5% and 10% levels, respectively. These relations are all consistent with a greater ability to finance investment leading to greater workplace safety and hence a lower risk of injury. Columns (2) and (3) show that, once establishment fixed effects are included, injury rates cease to show a relation with Cash/Assets and CashF low/Assets. However, the coefficient on Debt/Assets continues to be positive at the 5% level of statistical significance and increases in size.

The 0.0063 coefficient on Debt/Assets in column (3) implies that a one-standard-deviation increase in leverage (0.219) is associated with a 0.0014 unit increase in Injuries/Hour.

This represents a modest though nontrivial increase of 5.6% relative to the sample mean Injuries/Hour of 0.0247. For perspective, this effect is larger than existing estimates of the impact of either penalty-imposing OSHA inspections or plant unionization on injury rates (Mendelhoff and Gray (2005)). While the coefficients on Cash/Assets and CashF low/Assets are not statistically significant in columns (2) and (3), the coefficients in column (1) imply that a one-standard-deviation increase in these variables is associated 15 with a 6.34% and 3.01% increase in Injuries/Hour relative to the sample mean, respectively.

In all three columns, injury rates are negatively related to both Dividends/Assets and Log(Assets). Previous papers argue that a firm’s propensity to pay dividends and its size are inverse proxies for the degree to which the firm is financially constrained. While more indirect, these relations also provide support for financing constraints adversely impacting investment in workplace safety.

Investment in safety should be more relevant in industries in which production involves physical assets than in more service-oriented industries. Column (4) reports estimates from the main specification when we restrict the sample to establishments in industries with above-median average T angibleAssetRatio. The coefficient on Debt/Assets is 50% higher in column (4) than in column (3). As mean Injuries/Hour is 0.0266 in these establishments, the coefficient of 0.0093 on Debt/Assets implies that a one-standard-deviation increase in Debt/Assets is associated with an increase in Injuries/Hour of 7.66% relative to the mean.

Column (5) presents results using DAF W Injuries/Hour — the rate of more serious injuries — is the dependent variable. The coefficient on Debt/Assets in this regression is

0.023 and is statistically significant at the 5% level. A one-standard-deviation increase in leverage of 0.219 is associated with an increase in DAF W Injuries/Hour of 0.0005, which represents a 6.5% increase relative to the sample mean DAF W Injuries/Hour of 0.0077.

Thus, more serious injuries appear to increase meaningfully with leverage.

In the next two regressions, we analyze the extensive and intensive margins of the injury process separately. Column (6) presents results from a linear probability model with establishment, year-industry, and year-state fixed effects. The dependent variable is one if the establishment reports a positive number of injuries in a given year and zero if it reports zero injuries. Not surprisingly, larger establishments (those with more employees) are more likely to experience at least one injury in a given year. Among the firm-level characteristics, the probability of an injury is only statistically significantly related to Debt/Assets, with which 16 it has a positive relation.

Column (7) estimates equation (1) for with a positive number of injuries in the given year.

As in the full sample (column (3)), the injury rate is positively related to Debt/Assets and negatively related to Dividends/Assets and Log(Assets) for establishments on the intensive margin. These results help allay concerns that the large number of zeros in the injury data might somehow skew the regression results presented in the first three columns.

We further address concerns about the distribution of the injury data by estimating count models, which explicitly account for the nonnegative discrete nature of injuries. The dependent variables in these regressions is the number of injuries rather than the injury rate.

We specify an exposure variable, HoursW orked, to account for the scale of baseline exposure.

Column (8) reports estimates from an establishment fixed effects Poisson model.13 We also include state-year dummies in the regression, though industry-year dummies are omitted because they cause the estimation routine to fail. The coefficient on Debt/Assets is positive and statistically significant at the 1% level, consistent with the estimates in Table V.14 Column (9) presents estimates from a negative binomial model. Unlike the Poisson model, the negative binomial model does not admit fixed effects. However, it does relax the assumption of equal conditional mean and variance that the Poisson model imposes. We are able to include both industry-year and state-year dummies in this model. The coefficient on Debt/Assets is again positive and statistically significant at the 1% level. The coefficient on Cash/Assets is also negative and statistically significant at the 1% level in this regression.15 Overall, Table V presents evidence of a robust positive relation between an establishment’s injury rate in a given year and parent firm financial leverage at the end of the prior year. We further explore this relation by regressing year t Injuries/Hour on various leads and lags of Debt/Assets, controlling for the same variables as in Table V.16 Table VI presents the results.

— Insert Table VI here — 17 Column (1) presents results when we include just the first lead and lag of leverage, along with contemporaneous leverage, as explanatory variables. The injury rate is positively related to year t − 1 Debt/Assets. In contrast, it is unrelated to t + 1 Debt/Assets, partially alleviating concerns that the results in Table V might be driven by reverse causality. It is also unrelated to contemporaneous Debt/Assets. In column (2), we include the first three leads and lags of Debt/Assets. The coefficients on all three lags of Debt/Assets are positive, with those on the first two lags statistically significant at the 5% level. This suggests that any impact of leverage on injury risk persists for at least two years. The coefficients on all three leads of Debt/Assets are small in magnitude and statistically insignificant. Columns (3) and (4) confirm these patterns in Poisson regressions.

Overall, the results in this section provide evidence that financing constraints adversely impact workplace safety, with the consistent relation between injury rates and financial leverage providing the strongest evidence. Controlling for firm-level variables such as Capex/Assets and T angibleAssetRatio helps account for differences in growth and production technology.

The inclusion of establishment, industry-year, and state-year fixed effects requires that any omitted variable driving the relationship be time-varying within an establishment, and not purely through industry- or state-level time-variation. Ultimately, however, given the potentially endogenous nature of the explanatory variables with respect to injury rates, the results should not be interpreted as strong evidence of a causal link between leverage and injury risk.17

–  –  –

In this section, we further explore the effect of financing constraints on injury rates using three quasi-natural experiments involving cash flow shocks. The first experiment exploits a 18 provision in the American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) of 2004 allowing firms to pay a tax rate of 5.25% on repatriated foreign income on a one-time basis instead of the standard corporate tax rate of 35%. This shock represented a significant windfall for the domestic coffers of firms with profitable foreign subsidiaries. Firms collectively repatriated $312 billion in response to the AJCA according to IRS estimates. Dharmapala, Foley, and Forbes (2011) and Faulkender and Petersen (2011) study the effects of this shock on investment levels in general.

The second experiment exploits the maturity structure of firms’ debt at the onset of the financial crisis in late 2007. Credit markets seized up in the U.S. starting in August 2007 and remained tight through 2008, making it difficult for firms to roll over maturing debt.

A firm with a lot of debt maturing during this period effectively faced a negative cash flow shock. A firm’s maturity structure as of the beginning of the crisis is plausibly exogenous with respect to factors that might affect injury risk, as it was unlikely that firms anticipated the crisis when setting maturity schedules in the preceding years. Almeida et al. (2012) study the effect of this shock on investment levels in 2008.

The third experiment exploits substantial fluctuations in oil prices during our sample period. Oil prices increased from around $25 per barrel in 2002 to over $130 per barrel in 2008, before falling to the $40s in 2009. Higher oil prices increase the cash flow generated by oil producers. Because firms can reallocate capital internally, this increases the cash flow available to any non-oil establishments owned by oil producers. Assuming that oil price movements do not impact these non-oil establishments for other reasons, these shocks can be treated as exogenous with respect to injury rates in these non-oil establishments. Following this logic, Lamont (1997) studies the effect of a 1985 drop in oil prices on investment.

Each of the cash flow shocks involved in the experiments impacted some firms more than others. The AJCA represented a cash flow shock only for firms with previously unrepatriated foreign profits. The financial crisis represented a larger shock for firms with high 19 levels of debt maturing in 2008 than for firms with less debt maturing in 2008. Oil price movements represented a cash flow shock primarily for firms with oil-producing subsidiaries.

For the AJCA and financial crisis experiments, we exploit the differential exposure to conduct difference-in-differences analysis. Specifically, we identify establishments exposed to the shock in question (“treated” establishments) and those not exposed (“untreated” establishments). We then match each treated establishment to an untreated establishment, which we refer to as a “control” establishment, to form a matched sample and estimate regressions of

the following form using that sample:

Injuries/Hourit = βT reatmentt ∗ Exposurei + φXit + αi + δjt + γst + (2) it, where T reatment equals one for observations after the given shock and zero before, and Exposure equals one for treated establishments and zero for control establishments. We include all of the explanatory variables in the previous section as control variables Xit, and also include establishment (αi ), industry-year (δjt ), and state-year (γst ) fixed effects.18 We follow a similar approach for the oil price experiment, though here we set T reatment to the log of the mean oil price in year t, which is continuous.

Pages:     | 1 | 2 || 4 | 5 |   ...   | 7 |

Similar works:

«Trust and Ethics in Finance Innovative ideas from the Robin Cosgrove Prize Trust and Ethics in Finance Innovative ideas from the Robin Cosgrove Prize Editors Carol Cosgrove-Sacks / Paul H. Dembinski Globethics.net Global 6 Globethics.net Global Series editor: Christoph Stückelberger. Founder and Executive Director of Globethics.net and Professor of Ethics, University of Basel/Switzerland Globethics.net Global No. 6 (Formerly Globethics.net Series) Carol Cosgrove-Sacks / Paul H. Dembinski...»

« Table of Contents Introduction Ch. 1 History of Vaping Ch. 2 Why YOU Need to Care About Vaping Ch. 3 Safety First Ch. 4 E Cig Battery Basics: Cig-a-Likes, Egos, and Mods Ch. 5 Clearos, and Cartos, and Tanks (Oh My) Ch. 6 E Juice and You Ch. 7 Vaping for the First Time Ch. 8 Getting Connected: Vape Communities Conclusion Index – onVaping’s Recommended E Cigs Index – Vape Terminology and Definitions By Breanna Mimms and Brennen Phippen  Blog  VaperCons  Marketplace ...»

«Discussion Paper No. 2001/44 Finance in Conflict and Reconstruction Tony Addison,1 Philippe Le Billon2 and S. Mansoob Murshed1 August 2001 Abstract The relationship between an economy's financial sector and the occurrence and resolution of conflict may at first sight appear tenuous. Banking systems, financial regulation and currency arrangements do not appear to be relevant in understanding why nations collapse or why people kill each other. However, the linkages between the financial sector...»

«Patrick Criteser President and CEO Tillamook Patrick Criteser is a native Oregonian with a passion for and understanding of what it takes to run a manufacturing company with Northwest roots and a strong local heritage. Prior to joining The Tillamook County Creamery Association as president and CEO in August of 2012, he spent eight years as president and CEO at Coffee Bean International, a Portland, Ore.-based coffee roaster with a 40-year-old local heritage. Criteser is an experienced executive...»

«Judith A. Swanson April 7, 2016 Department of Political Science Boston University 232 Bay State Road Boston, MA 02215 U.S.A. Voicemail: (617) 965-5229; E-mail: jswanson@bu.edu Education B.A. (Political Science major), magna cum laude The Colorado College, June 1979 (January-June 1977 in France) Advisors: Fred Sondermann (1976-77), Timothy Fuller (1978-79) M.Sc., in History of Political Thought, with Distinction The London School of Economics and Political Science, October 1980 Tutors: Robert...»

«NEWSLETTER, Ginger Croley Blackstone, 1967 RAM’S HORN THE COLLEGE REUNION 2015 EDITION MAY 2015 VOLUME I, NUMBER I COLLEGE PARK PREPARES FOR STAMPEDE CPHS RAMS TO OVERTAKE GICC SEPT 19th No one ever could call College Park boring. From its founding in 1846, College Park has always been an energetic town, ready to take on the world. That will be an asset when College Park RAMS alumni storm their hometown in mid-September. The herd of grads from 1943-1974 will be corralled in CP’s Georgia...»

«URBAN LOCAL BODIES IN INDIA: QUEST FOR MAKING THEM SELF-RELIANT P.K.CHAUBEY Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi Presented in the National Seminar on Municipal Finances to be held on December 29-30, 2003 by the Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi under the auspices of the Twelfth Finance Commission. Scholars with whom the author had privilege to have discussion are too numerous to mention yet he cannot afford not to acknowledge his gratitude to some of them....»

«Ken Cyree, Ph.D. Dean of the Business School Frank R. Day/Mississippi Bankers Association Chair Professor of Finance Academic Background Ph.D. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, Finance, 1996 M.B.A. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, Finance, 1993 B.B.A. West Georgia College, Carrolton, GA, Management, 1991 Academic Experience Frank R. Day/Miss. Bankers Assoc. Chair and Professor of Finance, University of Mississippi (2011 Present). Dean, University of Mississippi (2008 Present)....»

«NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE HOUSING MARKET IMPACTS OF SHALE GAS DEVELOPMENT Lucija Muehlenbachs Elisheba Spiller Christopher Timmins Working Paper 19796 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19796 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2014 We thank Kelly Bishop, Yanyou Chen, Jessica Chu, Elaine Hill, Mark Fleming, Carolyn Kousky, Alan Krupnick, Nicolai Kumino, Corey Lang, Lala Ma, Jan Mares, Ralph Mastromonaco, Klaus Moeltner, Jaren Pope, Stefan...»

«UKSIF Holywell Centre 1 Phipp St, London EC2A 4PS Tel: 020 7749 9950 Email: info@uksif.org Web: www.uksif.org 16 December 2008 The Regulated Community Learning Team The Pensions Regulator Napier House Brighton BN1 4DW Email: kate.gerrard@thepensionsregulator.gov.uk Dear Ms Gerrard Response of UKSIF, the sustainable investment and finance association, to The Pensions Regulator Consultation Document: Review of the Trustee Knowledge and Understanding (TKU) code of practice (code of practice 7) and...»

«Queensland Parliamentary Library Minimising the Harm of Illicit Drug Use: Drug Policies in Australia The principle of harm minimisation has formed the basis of the drug policy framework in Australia since 1985. Harm minimisation in this context refers to policies and programs designed to prevent and reduce drugrelated harm. The overall aim of this approach is to improve the health, social and economic outcomes for both the community and the individual with the balanced use of three main...»

«University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Wharton Research Scholars Journal Wharton School 4-22-2014 Abenomics and Japanese Monetary Policy: A Path to Economic and Ethical Recovery Frank Ragusa University of Pennsylvania Nathaniel Barzideh University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.upenn.edu/wharton_research_scholars Part of the Business Commons Ragusa, Frank and Barzideh, Nathaniel, Abenomics and Japanese Monetary Policy: A Path to Economic and Ethical...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.