WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |

«Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: a ®eld study of restaurant employees CHRISTINA L. STAMPER1* AND LINN VAN DYNE2 1 University of ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Journal of Organizational Behavior

J. Organiz. Behav. 22, 517±536 (2001)

DOI: 10.1002/job.100

Work status and organizational citizenship

behavior: a ®eld study of restaurant

employees

CHRISTINA L. STAMPER1* AND LINN VAN DYNE2

1

University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Cameron School of Business, Department of Management and

Marketing, Wilmington, U.S.A.

2

Michigan State University, Eli Broad Graduate School of Management, Department of Management, East Lansing, U.S.A.

Summary This survey-based ®eld study of 257 service employees developed and tested a model of differ- ences in the organizational citizenship behavior of full-time and part-time employees based on social exchange theory. Questionnaire data from matched pairs of employees and their super- visors demonstrated that part-time employees exhibited less helping organizational citizenship behavior than full-time employees, but there was no difference in their voice behavior. We also predicted that both preferred work status (an individual factor) and organizational culture (a con- textual factor) would moderate the relationships between work status and citizenship. For help- ing, results demonstrated that preferred status mattered more to part-time workers than to full- time. For voice, preferred work status was equally important to part-time and full-time workers, such that voice was high only when actual status matched preferred status. Contrary to our expectations, work status made more of a difference in both helping and voice in less bureau- cratic organizations. We discuss the implications of work status for social exchange relation- ships, differences in the social exchange costs and bene®ts of helping compared to voice, and rami®cations of our ®ndings for future research. Copyright # 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Introduction Shortages of traditional, full-time workers have caused many organizations to increase their depen- dence on part-time employees (Clinton, 1997; Ilg and Clinton, 1998; Rousseau, 1997). In addition, many organizations view changing the mix of their workforce (i.e., replacing full-time workers with part-timers) as a positive response to competitive pressures for increased ¯exibility and reduced costs (Kalleberg and Schmidt, 1997). These trends in workforce recomposition, however, may have unin- tended, negative consequences on employee behaviors (especially discretionary behaviors) which may reduce any bene®ts accrued to the organization due to reduced labor costs.

Despite the fact that 16±18 per cent of the US workforce is part-time (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1998), we know little about the behavior of part-time and full-time employees. Our study addresses * Correspondence to: Christina Stamper, University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Cameron School of Business, Department of Management and Marketing, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, NC 28403, U.S.A.

E-mail: stamperc@uncwil.edu

–  –  –

this important issue by developing and testing a model that predicts differences in the organizational citizenship behavior of part-time and full-time employees. Based on Social Exchange Theory (Blau, 1964), we suggest that employees who work fewer hours (i.e., part-time) will engage in less organizational citizenship behavior (discretionary behavior that is not a required part of the job). In addition, we propose that two factors will in¯uence (moderate) this relation: an individual's preferred work status (few versus many work hours) and type of organizational culture (low versus highly bureaucratic).

Work Status

Part-time workers ± those who generally work under 35 hours per week (Deutermann and Brown, 1978; Nardone, 1986) ± are the largest group of U.S. employees working non-traditional schedules (Nollen and Axel, 1995). Since World War II, the number of part-time employees in the U.S. has grown to about one-®fth of the total workforce, or almost 20 million individuals (Ronen, 1984), and recent restructuring has further increased the emphasis that many organizations place on part-time employees. Most part-time positions in the U.S. are found in the service sector, especially among clerical, sales, and food service industries (Nollen and Axel, 1995). The majority of part-time workers are young (e.g., students, teens), older (e.g., retirees), and/or women (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1996).

To date, most research that has compared part-time and full-time employees has focused on differences in job-related attitudes such as satisfaction and commitment and has not examined job behaviors, despite calls for research on potential differences in behavior (e.g., Feldman, 1990; Hom, 1979; Miller and Terborg, 1979; Rotchford and Roberts, 1982). An important exception to this general focus on attitudes is the research of Peters et al., (1981), who demonstrated differences in the turnover of full-time and part-time workers. Results of their study suggest that full-time employees are more committed and loyal to the organization than part-time workers. Although these differences correspond to the beliefs of many managers that part-time workers have lower commitment, higher turnover, lower performance, and that they are less willing to contribute to the organization than their full-time counterparts (Gannon, 1975; Ronen, 1984; Rotchford and Roberts, 1982), a follow-up study by Jackofsky and Peters (1987) found no differences in performance and turnover of workers based on work status.





The inconsistency in these ®ndings suggests the importance of additional research in this area.

Con¯icting results (e.g., Feldman, 1990; Lee and Johnson, 1991; Miller and Terborg, 1979) also indicate the importance of theoretically based research. As with most research streams, the early studies on part-time workers were primarily descriptive, with researchers relying on a variety of theoretical perspectives to interpret their ®ndings post hoc. These theories include frame-of-reference and social comparison theory (Eberhardt and Shani, 1984; Feldman, 1990; Festinger, 1954; Miller and Terborg, 1979), equity theory (Adams, 1965; Feldman and Doerpinghaus, 1992), human capital theory (Becker, 1964; Lee and Johnson, 1991), partial inclusion (Katz and Kahn, 1966; Miller and Terborg, 1979), and the discrepancy model of job satisfaction (Lawler, 1973; Morrow et al., 1994). In the current study, we use Social Exchange Theory (Blau, 1964) to develop our hypotheses, which suggest that organizational citizenship will differ based on work status.

Organizational Citizenship Behavior In 1977, Organ broadened research on the satisfaction±performance link by suggesting a new type of performance construct: organizational citizenship behavior. Organ suggested that, although

–  –  –

satisfaction may not have a strong effect on standard conceptualizations of performance, it might be related to non-speci®ed behaviors which he termed organizational citizenship behavior. Organ de®ned organizational citizenship behavior as ``F F F individual behavior that is discretionary, not directly or explicitly recognized by the formal reward system, and that in the aggregate promotes the effective functioning of the organization'' (1988: 4). To date, researchers have proposed a variety of speci®c dimensions of organizational citizenship behavior including altruism, conscientiousness, sportsmanship, courtesy, civic virtue (Organ, 1988), obedience, loyalty, advocacy participation, social participation, functional participation (Van Dyne et al., 1994), helping and voice (Van Dyne et al., 1995; Van Dyne and LePine, 1998), as well as organization-focused and interpersonal-focused organizational citizenship behavior (Williams and Anderson, 1991). According to Van Dyne and colleagues (1994), each of the above conceptualizations is useful and researchers should focus on speci®c types of citizenship behaviors based on relevance to a particular research question.

In our study of restaurant workers, we chose to focus on two speci®c behaviors (helping and voice) because they form an interesting, theoretically based contrast that we anticipated would be salient in service settings. Van Dyne and colleagues (1995) developed a theoretical framework, typology, and nomological network for different types of discretionary behavior. Two of these categories are af®liative-promotive behavior (helping) and challenging-promotive behavior (voice). Promotive behavior is proactive; it causes things to happen. Promotive behavior that is af®liative is interpersonal and cooperative. An example is helping others with their work or with work-related activities, even when it is not required explicitly by the job. We suggest that helping is particularly important in service jobs where ¯uctuating demand highlights the bene®ts of cooperation. Speci®cally, employees have direct customer contact and often must balance competing demands for their time and attention. When work¯ow is uneven, cooperative behavior can enhance customer interaction and quality service delivery.

Helping co-workers thus has the potential to enhance customer satisfaction in ways that cannot be speci®ed in advance while simultaneously having important implications for overall service ®rm success.

In contrast, challenging-promotive behavior emphasizes ideas that are change-oriented. An example is speaking up and making recommendations for change and innovation. We suggest that expressing constructive suggestions (voice) is especially important in situations where consumers value high quality and novelty. In service settings, employees often are closest to the service delivery process and may be in the best position to generate ideas that can have direct consequences for quality and customer satisfaction. For example, customers often prefer and seek out novel or unusual approaches to service delivery. Thus, employee suggestions can help attract new and repeat customers.

We note that although helping and voice each have the potential to contribute positively to organizational success, these two forms of discretionary behavior differ fundamentally in that helping is af®liative and voice is challenging. Helping promotes cooperation and positive interpersonal relationships. In contrast, voice focuses on change to the status quo (LePine and Van Dyne, 1998). In the following sections, we build on the similarities and differences in helping and voice in our hypothesis development regarding the role of work status and organizational citizenship behavior.

Work Status and Organizational Citizenship

According to Blau (1964), social exchange is different from economic exchange. Economic exchange is based on quid pro quo transactions, such as when employees receive pay for contributing their performance to the organization. In economic exchange relationships, job requirements and expectations are clear and speci®ed in advance, allowing individuals to assess personal costs and bene®ts Copyright # 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. J. Organiz. Behav. 22, 517±536 (2001) 520 C. L. STAMPER AND L. VAN DYNE associated with the exchange and calibrate their contributions accordingly. In social exchange relationships, however, the details of the exchange are not speci®ed in advance and monitoring inducements and contributions is less relevant. Instead, relational trust leads individuals in social exchange relationships (Rousseau et al., 1998) to believe that if they exercise initiative and contribute above minimum expectations, they will receive some form of reciprocity from the organization at an unspeci®ed future date (Gouldner, 1960).

Extending social exchange theory to include differences in part-time versus full work status suggests that part-time employees are more likely to develop economic rather than social exchange relationships with their employers. For example, Rousseau (1989) differentiated transactional and relational psychological contracts, linking transactional contracts to economic exchange and relational contracts to social exchange. McLean Parks et al., (1998) elaborated on this idea and developed a theoretical model proposing that full-time, regular employees are more likely to rely on social exchange and reciprocity in their work relationships and that the characteristics of employee psychological contracts will in¯uence their behavior at work. Consistent with this logic, Millward and Hopkins (1998) demonstrated that when employees view their relationship as based primarily on economic exchange, they will meet the terms of the agreement and will perform at the minimum required level. In contrast, when employment is based on social exchange, employees expand their view of the relationship beyond well-speci®ed, quid pro quo parameters and include intangible and tangible resources based on general, unspeci®ed notions of reciprocity (Foa and Foa, 1974; Tsui et al., 1997). Accordingly, they are more likely to exert extra effort, use their judgment to facilitate quality problem solving, and perform non-required behaviors, because they trust that their employer will notice the contributions and reciprocate at some time in the future.

Part-time employees generally receive fewer inducements (March and Simon, 1958) such as bene®ts, training, and advancement from the organization than full-time workers (Hipple, 1998). Human capital theory (Becker, 1964) suggests that employers invest in employees (especially in training and other less tangible bene®ts) when they can expect a return on their investment. When employees work more hours, there is more opportunity for employer investments to accrue bene®ts to the organization.

In contrast, when employees work fewer hours, the potential bene®ts to the organization are reduced.

Thus, employers are less likely to provide extra inducements to part-time workers. Given fewer inducements, part-time employees have less reason to perform tasks that require effort beyond that speci®ed in their job descriptions (e.g., discretionary behaviors like helping and voice).



Pages:   || 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |


Similar works:

«October 2011 Mark Skidmore Curriculum Vitae Work: Home: Michigan State University 6019 Clise Road Department of Agricultural Economics Bath, Michigan 48808 208 Agriculture Hall Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1039 Phone: 517-353-9172 E-mail: mskidmor@msu.edu Education: Ph.D., Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 1994 Dissertation: “State Responses to Fiscal Stress” M.A., Economics, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, 1992 B.A., Economics,...»

«District Centres, Local Centres & Community Facilities Supplementary Planning Guidance October 2010 District Centres, Local Centres and Community Facilities Supplementary Planning Guidance _ October 2010 City and County of Swansea Economic Regeneration and Planning Civic Centre Oystermouth Road Swansea SA1 3SN Tel: 01792 635744 UDP@swansea.gov.uk All plans within this document are orientated to north. Photographs reproduced with the permission of City and County of Swansea and Welsh Assembly...»

«On the centrality of the current account in international economics Speech by Claudio Borio Head of the BIS Monetary and Economic Department Keynote speech at the ECB-Central Bank of Turkey conference “Balanced and sustainable growth – operationalising the G20 framework” Frankfurt, 28 August 2015 I would like to thank the organisers for their kind invitation to this event. I am delighted to be here. The conference title highlights the G20’s goal of achieving balanced and sustainable...»

«DIPLOMA IN BUSINESS SYSTEMS INFORMATION SYLLABUS BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAMME Diploma in Business Information Systems Syllabus Diploma Part 1 Diploma Part 2 The three compulsory papers are: The four compulsory papers are: 1. Computer Applications in 1. Networks and Distributed Systems Business & Finance 2. Principles of Programming 2. Computer Fundamentals 3. Quantitative Methods 3. Business Communication 4. Systems Analysis Students must also pass one of the Students must also pass...»

«Health Systems in Transition Vol. 17 No. 2 2015 Ukraine Health system review Valery Lekhan • Volodymyr Rudiy Maryna Shevchenko • Dorit Nitzan Kaluski Erica Richardson Erica Richardson (Editor) and Ellen Nolte (Series editor) were responsible for this HiT Editorial Board Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Josep Figueras, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Martin McKee, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom Elias...»

«Standard Summary Project Fiche – IPA centralised programmes (Regional / Horizontal programmes ; centralised National programmes) 1. Basic information 1.1 CRIS Number: 2007/19322 1.2 Title: Administrative capacity building of the Customs Administration for the full implementation of the common EU transit procedure 1.3 ELARG Statistical code: 03.29 1.4 Location: Serbia Implementing arrangements: 1.5 Contracting Authority (EC): EC 1.6 Implementing Agency: N/A 1.7 Beneficiary (including details...»

«Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports Corporate Governance of Financial Institutions Hamid Mehran Lindsay Mollineaux Staff Report no. 539 January 2012 Revised February 2012 This paper presents preliminary findings and is being distributed to economists and other interested readers solely to stimulate discussion and elicit comments. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily reflective of views at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the...»

«BTW3233 Conventional and Islamic finance law Unit Guide Semester 1, 2015 Copyright © Monash University 2014. All rights reserved. Except as provided in the Copyright Act 1968, this work may not be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the host Faculty and School/Department. The information contained in this unit guide is correct at time of publication. The University has the right to change any of the elements contained in this document at any time. Last updated: 25 Feb 2015...»

«THE ESTABLISHMENT AND USE OF DEDICATED TAXES FOR HEALTH World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific 2004 Acknowledgements This report was written for WHO by Ms Addy Carol, former Executive Director of the Western Australia Health Promotion Foundation (Healthway). This work was made possible through extrabudgetary contribution to the World Health Organization by the Government of Japan. WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data The establishment and use of dedicated taxes...»

«12/30/2015 Summary Financial Representative Department Finance Title Director of Finance Address 1155 E 60th Street, Office 18A City Chicago State or Province IL Zip or Postal Code 60637 Country USA Additional Contacts Name Dan Black Affiliation Faculty Advisor Department Title Deputy Dean and Professor Address 1155 E 60th Street, Suite 193 City Chicago State or Province IL Zip or Postal Code 60637 Country United States Project Description Project title:...»

«Wages and Currency: Global and Historical Comparisons Symposium in Amsterdam/Leiden, 24-25 May 2002 Abstracts The South-Chinese currency zone: China, Japan and insular Southeast-Asia from 12th-18th centuries Arjan van AELST (Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam) vanaelst@ubib.eur.nl From the 12th century on a trading zone based on the use of a cast base-metal currency developed in the region stretching southward from China. China, Japan and Java used the same type of currency but knew different...»

«CIDNY FACT SHEET FOOD STAMPS Online address: http://otda.ny.gov/programs/food-stamps/ Program Administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the New York State Food Stamp (FS) Program, known federally as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), issues monthly electronic benefits that can be used like cash for food at authorized retail food stores. Eligibility and benefit levels are based on household size, income, assets and other factors. Eligibility If your income...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.