«Thu Thi Nguyen*, Lokman Mia, Allen Huang Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith Business School Griffith University, Australia ...»
Etemadi, H, Dilami, ZD, Bazaz, MS & Parameswaran, R 2009, Culture, management accounting and managerial performance: Focus Iran, Advances in Accounting, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 216-225.
17 Fletcher, C & Baldry, C 2000, A study of individual differences and self-awareness in the context of multi-source feedback, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 73 No. 3, pp. 303-319.
Fornell, C & Larcker, DF 1981, Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
Fullerton, RR & McWatters, CS 2002, The role of performance measures and incentive systems in relation to the degree of JIT implementation, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 27 No. 8, pp. 711-735.
Gomez-Mejia, LR, Berrone, P & Franco-Santos, M 2010. Compensation and organizational performance: Theory, research, and practice, M.E.Sharpe, Inc.
Gomez-Mejia, LR, Larraza-Kintana, M & Makri, M 2003, The determinants of executive compensation in family-controlled public corporations, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp.
Gul, FA 1991, The effects of management accounting systems and environmental uncertainty on small business managers' performance, Accounting & Business Research, Vol. 22 No. 85, pp. 57-61.
Gul, FA & Chia, YM 1994, The effects of management accounting systems, perceived environmental uncertainty and decentralization on managerial performance: A test of three-way interaction, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19 No. 4-5, pp. 413-426.
Gunnigle, P, Foley, K & Morley, M 1994, Financial rewards and company ownership: An examination of reward practices in Ireland, The International Executive, Vol. 36 No. 5, pp. 575-598.
Gupta, AK & Govindarajan, V 2000, Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 No., pp. 473-496.
Hair, JF, Anderson, RE, Tatham, RL & Black, WC 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis, Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River. New Jersey 07485.
Hair, JF, Ringle, CM & Sarstedt, M 2011, PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 139-151.
Hartmann, FGH & Moers, F 1999, Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 24 No.
4, pp. 291-315.
Henri, J-F 2006, Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 31 No. 6, pp. 529-558.
Henseler, J 2012, PLS-MGA: A Non-Parametric Approach to Partial Least Squares-based Multi-Group Analysis, in Gaul, W. A. G.-S., A.; Schmidt-Thieme, L.; Kunze, J. (ed.) Challenges at the Interface of Data Analysis, Computer Science, and Optimization. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Horngren, CT, Foster, G & Datar, SM 2006. Cost Accounting: A managerial emphasis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Hulland, J 1999, Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20 No. 2, pp. 195-195.
Ittner, CD, Larcker, DF & Meyer, MW 2003, Subjectivity and the Weighting of Performance Measures:
Evidence from a Balanced Scorecard, The Accounting Review, Vol. 78 No. 3, pp. 725-758.
Ji, X-d, Lu, W & Aiken, M 2007, How do the Chinese management accountants cope with changes from a planned economy to a market economy, Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 45-61.
Jiang, W 2011, Ownership structure and executive compensation in Canadian corporations, Thesis.
Kaplan, RS & Norton, DP 1992, The Balanced Scorcard - Measures that Drive Performance, Harvard Business Review, Vol. January-February No., pp. 71-79.
18 Kato, T & Long, C 2004, Executive compensation, firm performance, and ownership structure: An empirical study of listed firms in China, Asian Development Bank Institute and the Asian Studies program of Colgate University.
Khan, R, Dharwadkar, R & Brandes, P 2005, Institutional ownership and CEO compensation: a longitudinal examination, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58 No. 8, pp. 1078-1088.
Kominis, G, Emmanuel, C & Slapnicar, S 2007, The Impact of Target Setting on Managerial Motivation & Performance, SSRN Working Paper Series, Vol. No.
Kumar, K 2006, Conducting Mini Surveys in Developing Countries, USAID Program Design and Evaluation Methodology Report, Center for Development Information and Evaluation U.S.
Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C.
Langfield-Smith, K, Thorne, H & Hilton, RW 2006. Management accounting: information for managing and creating value, McGraw-Hill Australia.
Le, CT & Truong, Q 2005, Human resource management practices in a transitional economy: A comparative study of enterprise ownership forms in Vietnam, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 25-47.
Macias, M 2002, Privatization and management accounting systems change: The case of the 19th century Spanish tobacco monopoly, The Accounting Historians Journal, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp.
Mahoney, TA, Jerdee, TH & Carroll, SJ 1963. Development of managerial performance: a research approach, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
Mia, L 1987, Participation in budgetary decision making, task difficulty, locus of control, and employee behavior: An empirical study, Decision Sciences, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 547-561.
Mia, L 1993, The role of MAS information in organisations: An empirical study, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 269-285.
Mia, L & Chenhall, RH 1994, The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 1-13.
Mia, L & Clarke, B 1999, Market competition, management accounting systems and business unit performance, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 137-158.
Mia, L & Goyal, M 1991, Span of control, task interdependence and usefulness of MAS information in not-for-profit government organizations, Financial Accountability & Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 249.
Mia, L, Iselin, E & Sands, J 2005, The performance effect of benchmarking and the balanced scorecard approach in performance reporting: An exploratory study, International Journal of Business Research, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 29-39.
Mia, L & Winata, L 2008, Manufacturing strategy, broad scope MAS information and information and communication technology, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 182.
Nguyen, DT & Pham, H 1996, Vietnam, in Ma, R. (ed.) Financial reporting in the Pacific Asia region World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore.
O'Connor, NG, Deng, J & Luo, Y 2006, Political constraints, organization design and performance measurement in China's state-owned enterprises, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol.
31 No. 2, pp. 157-177.
O’Connor, NG, Chow, CW & Wu, A 2004, The adoption of "Western" management accounting/controls in China's state-owned enterprises during economic transition, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 29 No. 3-4, pp. 249-275.
19 Otley, DT 1980, The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 413-428.
Pallant, J 2011. SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, Allen & Unwin, Crows Nest NSW 2065.
Patiar, A 2005, Managers'perception of market competition, transformational leadership, use of MAS information and performance: a cross-cultural study in hotels, Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Griffith University.
Patiar, A & Mia, L 2008, The interactive effect of market competition and use of MAS information on performance: Evidence from the upscale hotels, Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 209-234.
Pham, QN & Mohnen, P 2005, Optimal choice of ownership structure in Vietnam, International Input-output Association (IIOA).
Pham, VM 2010, Transfomation of state-owned enterprises [Online], Vietnamese Government, available: http://www.chinhphu.vn [accessed].
Rankin, FW & Sayre, TL 2011, Responses to risk in tournaments, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 53-62.
Ringle, CM, Wende, S & Will, S 2005, SmartPLS 2.0 (beta) [Online], Hamburg, available:
Sands, J 2006, Strategic priorities, management control systems, and managerial performance: An empirical study, Doctor of Philosophy Thesis, Griffith University.
Schulz, AK-D, Wu, A & Chow, CW 2010, Environmental uncertainty, comprehensive performance measurement systems, performance-based compensation, and organizational performance, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Vol. 17 No., pp. 17-39.
Shields, MD & Young, SM 1993, Antecedents and consequences of participative budgeting: Evidence on the effects of asymmetrical information, Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol.
5 No., pp. 265.
Simons, R 1995. Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
Sjöholm, F 2006, State owned enterprises and equitization in Vietnam, Stockholm School of Economics.
Smith, M 2003. Research Methods in Accounting, Sage Publications, inc.
Smyth, JD, Dillman, DA, Christian, LM & O'Neill, AC 2010, Using the Internet to Survey Small Towns and Communities: Limitations and Possibilities in the Early 21st Century, American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 53 No. 9, pp. 1423 - 1448.
Sprinkle, GB 2000, The Effect of Incentive Contracts on Learning and Performance, The Accounting Review, Vol. 75 No. 3, pp. 299-326 Sprinkle, GB 2003, Perspectives on experimental research in managerial accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28 No. 2–3, pp. 287-318.
Tabachnick, BG & Fidell, LS 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics, Pearson, New York.
Tan, J 2002, Impact of ownership type on environment-strategy linkage and performance: Evidence from a transitional economy, The Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 333-354.
Thornton, GC 1968, The relationship between supervisory and self appraisals of executive performance, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 441-455.
Tiessen, P & Waterhouse, JH 1983, Towards a descriptive theory of management accounting, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 8 No. 2-3, pp. 251-267.
20 Tsui, JSL 2001, The impact of culture on the relationship between budgetary participation, management accounting systems, and managerial performance: An analysis of Chinese and Western managers, The International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 125-146.
Van der Stede, WA, Young, SM & Chen, CX 2005, Assessing the quality of evidence in empirical management accounting research: The case of survey studies, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 30 No. 7-8, pp. 655-684.
van Veen-Dirks, P 2010, Different uses of performance measures: The evaluation versus reward of production managers, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 141-164.
Vietnamese Government 2006, available: http://www.chinhphu.vn [accessed].
Vietnamese National Assembly 2005, Law on Investment 2005, Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Wang, L & Judge, WQ 2011, Managerial ownership and the role of privatization in transition economies: The case of China, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Vol. No.
World Bank 2001, Vietnam 2010: Entering the 21st Century, Joint Report of World Bank, Asian Development Bank and United Nations Development Program, The World Bank, Washington DC.
Wright, KB 2006, Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 10 No. 3.
Zhu, Y, Collins, N, Webber, M & Benson, J 2008, New forms of ownership and human resource practices in Vietnam, Human Resource Management, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 157-175.
Zhu, Y, Warner, M & Rowley, C 2007, Human resource management with 'Asian' characteristics: a hybrid people-management system in East Asia, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 18 No. 5, pp. 745-768.
* * Note: ***Significant at the.01 level (one-tailed) Figure 2 Measurement (Outer) and Structural (Inner) Models Note: ** Statistically significant differences at the.05 level (one-tailed) Figure 3 Comparing Mean Values of the Constructs among Groups
Note: Differences are not significant at the 0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 level, one-tailed All relationships are significant except for the relationship between reward system and managerial performance in SOEs Figure 5 Comparing Path Coefficients among Groups