WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 37 | 38 || 40 | 41 |   ...   | 47 |

«ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: TYRANT! TIPU SULTAN AND THE RECONCEPTION OF BRITISH IMPERIAL IDENTITY, 1780-1800 Michael Soracoe, Doctor of ...»

-- [ Page 39 ] --

Wellesley and the Company's Response Wellesley had become the new Governor General of India in the spring of 1798, replacing the unassuming (and non-aristocrat) John Shore. Unlike his predecessor, Wellesley was a vain and ambitious man with dreams of expanding British power over the rest of the Indian subcontinent.43 He was well known as an exceedingly difficult man to work alongside, and he traveled to India determined to eliminate all French influence from the courts of the native rulers.44 Wellesley made little attempt to turn a profit for the Company, and was contemptuous of the mercantile Directors on Leadenhall Street. By the end of his seven years as Governor General (1798-1805), Wellesley had conducted so many wars against Indian princes and run up such large debts in the process that he was forcibly recalled home to Britain. Wellesley embodied the increasing shift of the East India Company's administration away from earlier generations of merchants and towards an aristocratic and militaristic command. His official portrait painted by Robert Home while serving as Governor General in 1801 [Figure 1] suggested the growing imperial style of rule practiced by Wellesley in India, far removed from the more humble portrayal C. A. Bayly. Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988): 81 William Dalrymple. White Mughals: Love and Betrayal in Eighteenth Century India (2003): 45 of earlier Company administrators.45 Wellesley's appointment to the position of Governor General signaled a much more interventionist policy by the Company in the affairs of Indian states, a marked contrast to the hands-off approach that had been employed by Shore over the previous five years.46 When Wellesley learned of the Malartic Proclamation, he immediately resolved to invade Mysore, believing that it provided sufficient rationale for a preemptive war of conquest. However, with Britain embroiled in an enormous war against France in Europe, there was little enthusiasm at home for further military adventures in India. Henry Dundas and the Company's Board of Control in London were prepared to sanction Wellesley's wars in India, but only insofar as they achieved the goal of protecting British India from the threat posed by France.47 The Company's administration in London was not interested in further wars of conquest in India, and insisted that any military conflicts should be defensive in nature, only acting to protect existing Company territory, not acquire further domains. The British public also exhibited little interest in going to war with Tipu Sultan again in 1798, expressing instead fear that he might combine his forces with revolutionary France and conquer the Company's holdings.48 The overall sentiment coming from the British metropole with regards to India was somewhat of a "wait and see" attitude, advising a cautious approach designed to safeguard the Company's possessions and wait for further instructions from home.

Robert Home. Richard Colley Wellesley, 2nd Lord Mornington (1801). Stratfield Saye House See Chapter 1 Edward Ingram (ed.) Two Views of British India: The Private Correspondence of Mr. Dundas and Lord Wellesley, 1798-1801 (Bath: Adams & Dart, 1969): 4 See for example Lloyd’s Evening Post (London, England) 3 August 1798, Issue 6387, with an article on how "Buonaparte and His Expedition" would link up with Tipu in India.

These restrictions from London greatly influenced Wellesley's response to the situation, and dictated how he represented events in the wider public sphere. Wellesley had immediately determined to attack Mysore regardless of the actual threat posed by Tipu, seeing the Malartic Proclamation as ample justification for his war of conquest, but it was very important to portray his actions in the proper context. Wellesley took pains to insist that Tipu Sultan was responsible for the conflict, and that the Company's preemptive invasion of Mysore was in fact a defensive act, one within the restrictions laid down by Parliament and the Board of Control. Wellesley was familiar with the controversy surrounding the beginning of the previous Third Mysore War (1790-92), not least because he had been a member of Parliament and argued in defense of the Company during the debates engendered by that war.49 Wellesley had spoken out against the political Opposition at that time, insisting that their criticisms had caused a negative effect on the war in India, undermining the confidence of the Company soldiers and elevating the fortunes of Tipu. As Governor General, Wellesley took steps to play up Tipu's supposed alliance with France, placing all of the blame for the fighting on the shoulders of Tippoo the Tyrant, and continued to insist that his own invasion was a purely defensive act. In these efforts, Wellesley would be extremely successful, helping to ensure that there was virtually no criticism of the Fourth Mysore War in the metropole, and persuading the British public to accept his interpretation of events wholesale.

Wellesley first received word of the Malartic Proclamation in June 1798, while he was traveling through Cape Colony en route to India. The Governor General immediately determined that he would go to war with Tipu upon receiving this information, even before his arrival in India. In his letter of 21 November 1798 to the Court of Directors, Evening Mail (London, England) 14 March 1792, Issue 477. See Chapter 4.

Wellesley wrote that he issued "final orders" for war to the governments of Madras and Bombay as far back as 20 June, calling their armies into the field against Tipu.50 All of the later correspondences between Wellesley and Tipu Sultan were therefore little more than a sham, designed to stall for time until the Company's military was prepared to invade the country of Mysore. The decision for war had already been made.





It is difficult to say how Wellesley's actions would have been interpreted in the British metropole if no further events had taken place; it would not have been out of the question for a sizable political opposition to emerge in the same fashion as in the previous war against Tipu. However, Wellesley was able to take advantage of unrelated military events taking place in Europe to exaggerate the threat posed by Tipu's supposed French alliance, and suggest that British India was in far more danger than actually existed. Fear of the contemporary French expedition to Egypt became associated in the mind of the British public with fears of Tipu Sultan overrunning the Company's territory, and ultimately provided a carte blanche for Wellesley's own preemptive invasion. In point of fact, Wellesley was well aware that the French soldiers in Egypt had no possibility of reaching India, but he led the Company's Court of Directors and the British public to believe the opposite.

At roughly the same time that Wellesley left Britain en route to India, a French naval expedition left the port of Toulon in late May 1798. This would become Napoleon's ill-fated Egyptian expedition, but the destination of this force was not immediately known at the time, and there was much anxiety in London that the French were planning to land in India. Henry Dundas learned of the departure of the French expedition on 1 East India Company. Copies and Extracts of Advices to and from India, Relative to the Cause, Progress and Successful Termination of the War with the Late Tippoo Sultaun (London: Printed for the Proprietors of East India Stock, 1977, 1800). Governor General to the Court of Directors, 21 November 1798: 6 June 1798, and shortly thereafter received word of the Malartic Proclamation on 14 June, which appeared to confirm the worst fears of a French invasion of India.51 The Company's Court of Directors responded by sending a letter to Wellesley on 18 June warning him of the possibility of the French landing in India. The Directors wrote that it was "highly improbable" that Tipu would have entered into an alliance with the French without making preparations for war ahead of time; therefore, if it were proven that he was building up for war, "it would be neither prudent nor politic to wait for actual hostilities on his part" and "to take the most immediate and most decisive measures to carry our arms into the enemy's country."52 However, at the same time the Directors also warned Wellesley to use his utmost discretion, so that the Company would not be involved in another war in India without the most inevitable necessity. The Directors and the Board of Control were therefore authorizing Wellesley to use force, and even invade Mysore if necessary, but only on the grounds of stopping a French invasion force from landing there. If it could not be proven that Tipu was planning for war, then Wellesley was advised to use his discretion and refrain from further conflict. For the Company's policy makers in London, it was the French who were the threat, not Tipu Sultan.53 News of the French landing in Egypt did not arrive in India until 18 October, and due to this late date, the news would not factor into the Governor General's consideration of the situation at all. Wellesley had already issued to Madras and Bombay his "final orders" for war against Tipu as far back as 20 June, months before any word arrived that Edward Ingram (ed.) Two Views of British India: The Private Correspondence of Mr. Dundas and Lord Wellesley, 1798-1801 (1969): 4 East India Company. Copies and Extracts of Advices to and from India (1977, 1800) Court of Directors to the Governor General, 18 July 1798 Ibid, Court of Directors to the Governor General, 18 July 1798 the French were in Egypt.54 Wellesley also learned of Admiral Nelson's destruction of the French fleet only two weeks after hearing the initial news of its landing in Egypt, on 31 October, and therefore long before war with Tipu broke out, he knew that Napoleon's force had no prospect of making its way to India. All of this information about events taking place in the Mediterranean had little bearing on the situation in India because Wellesley had long been committed to war with Mysore, ever since the early summer when he initially heard of the Malartic Proclamation. In a later letter to the Directors, Wellesley restated that he made his decision for war in June 1798, and added: "I have no hesitation in declaring, that my original resolution was (if circumstances would have admitted) to have attacked the Sultaun instantly, and on both sides of his dominions, for the purpose of defeating his hostile preparations, and of anticipating their declared object."55 He was prevented from doing so only due to the poor state of the Company's army, and the lack of supplies for a campaign at that time. The next six months were therefore a stalling period to build up the Company forces for war, as Wellesley readily admitted in his dispatches back to Dundas.

In order to defend his aggressive policy, Wellesley was preoccupied with finding enough local Indian justification for attacking Tipu. All throughout 1798 and 1799, Wellesley had to write to the Court of Directors as if Tipu were about to attack the Company, when in fact the Company was preparing to attack him. It was necessary to suggest great provocation, because when the war was fought the Company's military would immediately go onto the offensive into Mysore. 56 The war could only be Ibid, Governor General to the Court of Directors, 21 November 1798: 6 Ibid, Governor General to the Court of Directors, 20 March 1799: 25 Edward Ingram (ed.) Two Views of British India: The Private Correspondence of Mr. Dundas and Lord Wellesley, 1798-1801 (1969): 4-5 characterized as defensive in nature if Tipu had provided enough provocation to justify a doctrine of pre-emptive invasion. This necessitated emphasizing the familiar themes of the Tipu Legend, in which the Sultan was envisioned as a duplicitous and untrustworthy negotiator in his correspondences with the Governor General, and exaggerating the threat posed by the connection to France.

The narrative of the war written by Lieutenant-Colonel Alexander Beatson, Wellesley's aide-de-camp, provided an example of how these negotiations were rationalized. Writing on the situation in 1798, Beatson contended, "Although the Governor General deemed it his duty, at this period, to call the armies into the field... his Lordship's views and expectations were all devoted to the preservation of peace; which there was no prospect of securing, than by a state of forward preparation for war."57 Passages such as these neatly reversed the burden of culpability, placing responsibility for the conflict onto the Sultan. In truth, Wellesley would be negotiating with Tipu in bad faith during their exchange of letters, having already determined upon going to war regardless of Tipu's response. The Sultan's reputation would once again be deployed here as a means of justifying aggression overseas and making it palatable to British audiences at home.

Wellesley's early letters to Tipu in the summer of 1798 were cordial and made no mention of the Malartic Proclamation or his plans for war, confining the discussion instead to minor issues such as a border dispute in the district of Wynaad.58 Strangely, the French were not discussed in these letters at all, given that the "alliance" with France was Alexander Beatson. A View of the Origin and Conduct of the War with Tippoo Sultaun (London: Printed by W. Bulmer and Co, 1800): 49 East India Company. Copies and Extracts of Advices to and from India (1977, 1800). Governor General to Tipu Sultan, 14 June 1798: xxi-xxiii the alleged justification for going to war later. After receiving word of Admiral Nelson's victory over the French fleet, Wellesley wrote to Tipu on 4 November 1798 to taunt him with the destruction of his supposed allies. After outlining the details of Nelson's triumph and heaping scorn upon the French ("the general enemy of mankind"), Wellesley concluded by stating how "confident from the union and attachment subsisting between us, that this intelligence will afford you sincere satisfaction, I could not deny myself the pleasure of communicating it."59 The last line was an obvious taunting jibe directed at Tipu. What makes the message so interesting was the context in which it was delivered;

this was the first letter Wellesley had sent to Tipu since 7 August, and that message had not mentioned France at all. This exchange provided further evidence that Napoleon's expedition to Egypt was not a motivating factor in Wellesley's decision to go to war, but rather used as a pretext to justify the decision afterwards.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 37 | 38 || 40 | 41 |   ...   | 47 |


Similar works:

«Buckley Systems Ltd. A History This case history was written by Charles Campbell and Lawrence Corbett as part of the CANZ Research Programme at Victoria University of Wellington. The programme is funded by the PGSF under contract VIC806. RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION Version 6 25/07/03 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION TODAY Manufacturing The Ion Implanter Innovation Workforce Finance and Ownership Markets Customer relations Competition YESTERDAY Bill Buckley Buckley Systems Ltd. The BSL 500 TOMORROW...»

«Goodall – Guernsey Fiction ‘THE SPELL OF SARNIA’1 Fictional Representations of the Island of Guernsey PETER GOODALL University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba goodall@usq.edu.au Abstract Although there is nothing that resembles a comprehensive literary history of Guernsey, or of any of the islands of the English Channel, Guernsey has been the subject of many interesting representations in fiction. Two great novels dominate this tradition: Victor Hugo’s Les Travailleurs de la mer...»

«Nuestra América: Latino History as United States History Vicki L. Ruiz As historians, many of us have had the experience of encountering a memoir, diary, or letter in which the individuals mentioned are far more intriguing than the author of the document. The chatty reminiscences of Señora Doña Jesús Moreno de Soza serve as a case in point. Born in California in 1855, she came of age, married, and cared for her family near Tucson, Arizona. When she was eighty-four, she recounted the...»

«2001 Yearbook of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine. J-L Vincent (Ed.), Springer, Berlin, pp. 386-396 Cerebral Function in Coma, Vegetative State, Minimally Conscious State, Locked-in Syndrome, and Brain Death S. Laureys, J. Berré, and S. Goldman Introduction Progress in intensive care has increased the number of patients who survive severe acute brain injury. The majority of these patients recover from their coma within the first days after the insult, others will take more time and go...»

«#1978—November 22, 2009—“Sweat the Small Stuff”–1 [Gauger:] This is Moody Presents, the weekly half-hour broadcast featuring the teaching ministry of Dr. Paul Nyquist, ninth president of the Moody Bible Institute. I’m Jon Gauger, welcoming you to today’s broadcast. You know, in an age where your truth and my truth are of equal value—when God is seen as moldable, pliable, whatever you want Him to be—the notion of God as judge. That’s older than antique. And yet Dr. Nyquist...»

«Abstract The Ionian Revolt, Reconsidered By Misty Denise Joyner November 2010 Director: Anthony Papalas, Ph.D. Major Department: DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY The purpose of this study is to research the effect of Herodotus’ bias towards the Ionians had on his account of the events, figures, and proposed purpose of the Ionian Revolt. Research has shown that Herodotus had a favorable perspective on other Greek groups. Unlike these groups, Herodotus’ perspective of the Ionians as the weakest of the...»

«Exploring India’s Hinduism and Buddhism Robert Milton Underwood, Jr. © 2009 Underwood 1 Exploring India’s Hinduism and Buddhism Every religious man should study other religions in order to understand his own religion Paul Carus Introduction The Indian religious heritage is incredibly rich, diverse and ancient. The peoples themselves have long histories, with some of the pre-Aryan aboriginals dating back to the Stone Age (Noss 81). What evolved into Hinduism and then later branched off into...»

«LJHS Circuit Rider Aweomesauce April 2014 LJHS Circuit Rider Awesomesauce April 2014 1 | Cover 21 | Albert Einstein Quotes 2 | Table of Contents 22 | Book Series of the Month 3 | Awesomesauce April 23 | Princess Gossip, pt. 3 4 | Staff Page 24 | Instrument of the Month 5 | Editor & Assistant Editor 25 | Band of the Month Page 26 | Fun Things for Siri 6 | April District 27 Calendar 27 | Boys Track Team 7 | LJHS Activity Calendar 28 | Girls Track Team 8 | Silly Days of the Month 29 | Super Rad...»

«A Grave in the Sand Bessie Head: The Life and Death of a South African Writer This is series of incidents from the final years and from the funeral of the writer Bessie Head, written by the Danish historian Maria Rytter. As the first curator of the Khama III Memorial Museum in Serowe in Botswana, she officially opened the Museum in 1985. In 1986 she established the Khama Archive and the Bessie Head Papers as archives of the same Museum. Although she did not know Bessie very well, in the days...»

«Concepten en objecten proef 1:B or P 23-01-2012 00:33 Pagina 102 Making UNMAKEABLELOVE The Relocation of Theatre Sarah Kenderdine and Jeffrey Shaw Introduction We need machines that suffer from the burden of their memory. Jean-François Lyotard (1991: 22) This paper addresses the histories of liveness and performance and the life of machines by articulating theoretical positions on Samuel Beckett’s prose work The Lost Ones in relation to a recent new media work UNMAKEABLELOVE (Kenderdine &...»

«4 The Africa Journal ofEvangelical Theology 12.1 1993 Allied Treatment Of Protestant Missionaries In German East Africa In World War I Dr. Richard V. Pierard The fate ofGennan missions during and after World War I is a negelcted topic in African Church History. Dr. Pierard surveys the work of German missions from 1885 onwards and notes that despite the destructive disruption of war the work of missions continued. Beyond the regrettable treatment suffered at the hands of the Allies by many...»

«oxford paperback reference The Kings & Queens of Britain Professor John Cannon held the chair of Modern History at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne until 1992. He has edited several titles, including The Letters of Junius (1978), The Oxford Companion to British History (1997), and The Blackwell Dictionary of Historians (1988), which was awarded a Library Association prize for reference works. His other publications include The Fox±North Coalition (1969), Parliamentary Reform (1973),...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.