WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 34 | 35 || 37 | 38 |   ...   | 54 |

«Self-defence as a ground of justification in cases of battered women who kill their abusive partners CANDIDATE’S DECLARATION: I declare that ...»

-- [ Page 36 ] --

Above n17 at 124. See also Antley (1964), 2 C.C.C. 142 (C.A.).

Above n17 at 124.

6.3 A CONSIDERATION OF THE ‘CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE ACCUSED’

AND THE NEED FOR AND ROLE OF THE EXPERT WITNESS

6.3.1 General Rules of Admissibility of Expert Evidence

The general rule with regard to the admissibility of expert evidence is set out in Kelliher v Smith. 97 The finding of the court was that in order for the evidence of an expert to be admissible, ‘the subject-matter of the inquiry must be such that ordinary people are unlikely to form a correct judgment about it, if unassisted by persons with special knowledge.’ 98 Referring specifically to the admissibility of psychiatric evidence, Abbey is apposite. In his judgment in Abbey Dickson J

stated the rule as follows:

With respect to matters calling for special knowledge, an expert in the field may draw inferences and state his opinion. An expert’s function is precisely this: to provide the judge and jury with a ready-made inference which the judge and jury, due to the technical nature of the facts, are unable to formulate. An expert’s opinion is admissible to furnish the court with scientific information which is likely to be outside the experience and knowledge of a judge or jury. 99

6.3.2 The Need For and Use of Expert Evidence in Cases of Domestic Violence

The seminal case in Canada on the importance and necessity of expert evidence in cases of battered women who kill their abusive partners is Lavallee. 100 In casu the court, in reaching its decision, emphasised its awareness of the various myths and stereotypes that attach to the battering relationship and also noted as Kelliher v Smith (1931) 4 D.L.R. 102.

Above n97 at 116.

Abbey (1982), 68 C.C.C. (2d) 394 at 409 (S.C.C.) citing Lawton LJ in Turner (1974) 60 Cr.App.R. 80, at 83.

Above n17.

a fact that intimate violence is ‘beyond the experience of the average juror …’ 101 The court laid the foundation for its judgment and decision to admit expert testimony in cases involving battery in its opening statement. Handing down judgment for the majority, Wilson J recognised that expert evidence was admissible to assist the trier of fact in drawing inferences in areas where the expert has relevant knowledge or experience beyond that of the lay person. 102 She acknowledged that in cases of domestic violence and battered women it was unlikely that the mental state of the accused could be properly appreciated without such evidence and therefore the expert testimony was both relevant and necessary. 103 Wilson J noted that The average member of the public (or of the jury) can be forgiven for asking: Why would a woman put up with such kind of treatment? Why should she continue to live with such a man? How can she love a partner who beat her to the point of requiring hospitalization? We would expect the woman to pack her bags and go. Where is her self-respect? Why does she not cut loose and make a new life for herself? Such is the reaction of the average person confronted with the so-called battered wife syndrome. We need help to understand it and help is available from trained professionals. 104 Stressing the importance of expert testimony in cases of domestic violence, Wilson J cautioned that courts should be wary of refusing to listen to experts because of ‘a belief that judges and juries are thoroughly knowledgeable about “human nature” and that no more is needed. 105 In confirming the importance of expert evidence in cases involving battered women, murder and self-defence, L’Heureux-Dube J in Malott was of the opinion that (referring to the decision in

Lavallee):

Above n17 at 98.

Ibid.

Ibid.

Above n17 at 112.

Above n17 at 111.

A crucial implication of the admissibility of expert evidence in Lavallee is the legal recognition that historically both the law and society may have treated women in general, and battered women in particular, unfairly. … The expert evidence is admissible, and necessary, in order to understand the reasonableness of a battered woman’s perceptions … that she had to act with deadly force in order to preserve herself from death or grievous bodily harm …. 106 In her minority judgment in Malott, L’Heureux-Dube J also emphasised the importance of an individualised approach in appreciating the battered woman’s

unique experience; 107 but stressed that it would be:

… wrong to think of this development of the law as merely an example where an objective test … has been modified to admit evidence of the subjective perceptions of a battered woman. [Making reference to Lavallee she continued to state that m]ore importantly, a majority of the Court [in Lavallee] accepted that the perspectives of women, which have historically been ignored, must now equally inform the objective standard of the reasonable man in self-defence.’ 108 Commenting on the judgment of L’Heureux-Dube, Tang is of the view that the judge was effectively urging future courts dealing with cases involving domestic violence to ensure that their legal enquiry focussed on the reasonableness of the actions of the battered woman within her personal experience and the relationship of abuse between her and her partner. 109 The issue, states Tang, is thus not whether the accused fitted the mould of the battered woman syndrome but rather on the reasonableness of her behaviour taking account of the circumstances of her life and environment. 110 Malott above n11 at 140-1. See also above n7 at 993.





Malott above n11 at 140-1.

Ibid.

K Tang ‘Battered Woman Syndrome Testimony in Canada: Its Development and Lingering Issues’ 2003 47 International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 618, at 623.

Ibid.

6.3.3 The Nature of the Expert Evidence that Will Be Admitted in Cases of Domestic Violence In considering the Canadian law of self-defence and specifically section 34(2) of the Criminal Code the court in Lavallee held that the evidence of the expert would be especially relevant in assisting the court to deal firstly, for the purposes of section 34(2)(a), with the issue of the temporal connection between apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm and the act allegedly taken in self-defence by explaining the heightened ability of the accused to perceive danger from the

deceased. In dealing with this aspect, the court held:

Expert testimony relating to the ability of the accused to perceive danger from the deceased would go to the issue of whether she reasonably apprehended death or grievous bodily harm on the occasion in question.

While s. 34(2) does not actually stipulate that the accused apprehend imminent danger before acting in self-defence, there is an assumption that it is inherently unreasonable to apprehend death or grievous bodily harm unless and until the physical assault is actually in progress at which point the victim can reasonably gauge the requisite amount of force needed to repel the attack and act accordingly. … The issue is not, however, what an outsider would have reasonably perceived but what the accused reasonably perceived, given her situation and her experience. 111 In attempting to contextualise the actions of the accused, the defence in Lavallee’s case relied on the battered woman syndrome and admitted expert testimony to explain the syndrome and avoid the court ‘improperly concluding that she [the accused] was not as badly beaten as she claim[ed] or she would Above n17 at 96.

have left the man a long time ago, or even if she was severely beaten that she stayed out of some masochistic enjoyment of it.’112 However, also referring to ‘the so-called battered-spouse syndrome’ the trial

judge in Lavallee had cautioned that labels and labelling should be avoided:

rather the court emphasised that what was important was the evidence and how the evidence influenced the accused’s actions. 113 Both the trial court and the Supreme Court of Canada in Lavallee’s case took the view that the experts were not required to testify to the accused being a battered

woman or even that she presented with the characteristics of a battered woman:

Rather, the court was more interested in the evidence of the expert (presented without the ‘labels’) insofar as it would assist the court in providing a contextual understanding of the reasonableness of the accused’s belief that her life was in danger. 114 The Supreme Court emphasised that there was no acquittal for being a battered woman and Wilson J noted, ‘Battered women may well kill their partners other than in self-defence. The focus is not on who the woman is, but on what she did.’ 115 However, some commentators have been critical of the judgment in Lavallee for failing to expressly jettison the battered woman syndrome from the law. 116 Shaffer is one of the critics and notes that the intention expressed by Wilson J to dispel stereotypes about battered women was certainly not realised by her judgment. 117 Tang is especially critical of the fact that despite Lavallee being an aboriginal woman, the court did not even address the issue of women of colour. 118 On the other hand, Trotter gives acclaim to Lavallee for specifically transforming the law of self-defence in Canada ‘by Above n17 at 98.

Above n17 at 126. See also Malott above n11 at 140.

Above n17 at 126.

Ibid.

Above n109 at 624-7.

Above n27 at 13. See also D Martinson ‘Implications of Lavallee v R for Other Criminal Law Doctrines’ 1991 25 U.B.C. Law Review 25, at 25-36; EM Schneider Battered Women and Feminist Law Making (Yale University Press, New Haven: 2002) 66; and RA Schuller, BM McKimmie and T Janz ‘The Impact of Expert Testimony in Trials of Battered Women Who Kill’ 2004 2 Psychiatry, Psychology and the Law 1, at 11.

Above n109 at 624.

recognizing the important role of BWS evidence.’ 119 What is apparent is that as a result of the reference to battered woman syndrome in Lavallee, other courts have also accepted BWS with its defining character markers as a part of the Canadian law. 120 Four years later, in Malott the minority judgment sought to address the issue of battered woman syndrome in the courtroom. In casu, L‘Heureux-Dube J argued for the courts to go beyond the narrow definition of battered woman syndrome stating, ‘It is possible that women that are unable to fit themselves within the stereotype of a victimized, passive, helpless, dependent, battered woman will not have their claims to self-defense fairly decided. For instance, women who have demonstrated too much strength or initiative, women of colour, women who are professionals or women who might have fought back against their abusers on previous occasions, should not be penalized for failing to accord with the stereotypical image of the archetypal battered woman. This should not prejudice their claim to the reasonableness of their conduct.’ 121 L’Heureux-Dube J thus stated that the test of reasonableness (as opposed to a reference to the battered woman syndrome) was able to overcome stereotypes of battered women. She noted, ‘Finally, all of this should be presented in such a way as to focus on the reasonableness of the woman’s actions, without relying on old or new stereotypes about battered women.’ 122 GT Trotter ‘Justice, Mercy and the Royal Prerogative of Mercy: Examining the Self-Defence Review’ 2001 26 Queen’s Law Journal 339, at 340.

See above n27 at 20. Tang points out that like their counterparts in the U.S.A., legal researchers in Canada have been highly critical of the use of ‘syndrome’ which is seen as an attempt to ‘medicalize’ the issue of domestic violence.: above n109 at 621. See also I Grant ‘The “Syndromization” of Women’s Experience’ 1991 25 U.B.C. Law Review 51, at 51. In attempting to provide some explanation for the introduction of battered woman syndrome to the courts and their reciprocal acceptance of it, Tang suggests that one plausible explanation of this reference by the defence has to do with the historical predisposition on the part of the Canadian courts to accept psychiatric evidence because it carries the canon of science.: above n109 at 622. White-Mair develops the idea further noting that in the context of the Canadian courts ‘medical evidence that [also] resonates with the common life experience of male judges and juries are more readily taken up as the explanation of why certain women behaved as they did.’: K White-Mair ‘Experts and Ordinary Men: Locating R v Lavallee, Battered Woman Syndrome, and the “New” Psychiatric Expertise on Women Within Canadian Legal History’ 2000 12 Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 406, at 437.

Malott above n11 at 142.

Malott above n11 at 144. See also Grant above n120 at 52.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 34 | 35 || 37 | 38 |   ...   | 54 |


Similar works:

«Contents 2 Editor’s Column Mark Twain Studies Mark Twain Studies TATSUMI Takayuki Vol.1 No.1 (October 2004) Special Feature: Published every two (or three) years by Mark Twain, Our Contemporary The Japan Mark Twain Society ISSN 1349-4635 7 “The Most Rigorous Law of Our Being”: Mark Twain, Growth, and Change Shelley Fisher FISHKIN Editorial Board Mark Twain Studies 10 My Samuel Clemens Michael J. KISKIS c/o Prof. TATSUMI Takayuki English Dept, Faculty of 13 The Influence of Mark Twain Fred...»

«INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTH BEND FACULTY/STAFF PUBLICATIONS LISTS 2003 The following list includes those published items and creative works as submitted by the faculty and staff at IUSB in their Annual Reports for 2003. The list is not intended as a comprehensive list of all works published by IUSB faculty and staff during 2003. Arts Michael Lasater Central Wyoming College Gallery, Riverton, Wyoming, The Human Condition, October • 22-November 23, 2003._ National juried group exhibition._...»

«State Telecom Legislation: Broken Promises NATOA Conference New Orleans, Louisiana September 28, 2012 Gabriel Garcia Assistant City Attorney City of San Antonio Overview Past – Incumbent telecom companies failed to keep their  promise to deploy fiber networks after states granted “incentive regulation” in the 1990s. Present – After many states deregulated the cable industry to  encourage video competition between the telecom and cable industries, AT&T and Verizon are now...»

«Guarantee of the accused person's right to defense counsel. A comparative study of Vietnamese, German and American criminal procedure law Luong Thi, My Quynh Published: 01/01/2011 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Luong Thi, M. Q. (2011). Guarantee of the accused person's right to defense counsel. A comparative study of Vietnamese, German and American criminal procedure law The Faculty of Law, Lund University General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications...»

«CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ROCKFORD JOURNAL OF PROCEEDINGS MARCH 29, 2010 COUNCIL CONVENED AT 6:07 P.M.1. The invocation was given by Chaplain Robert Jones, St. Luke Missionary Baptist Church/ Police Chaplain and the Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Page Yesenia Centeno.2. Roll Call: Mayor Lawrence J. Morrissey Aldermen: Sosnowski, Curran, Mark, Hervey, Jacobson, Thompson-Kelly, Johnson, Timm, Beach, Elyea, Beck, McNeely, Robertson -13Absent: Wasco -13. Alderman Mark moved to accept the...»

«Health and Safety Advice for Scaffolders Where there are unsafe acts illustrated in the photographs the scenarios were re-created for illustration purposes and no one was put at risk at any time. Contents Introduction 2 Scaffolders 4 Health and Safety Law 5 Health and Safety On Site 8 Health and Safety Training 10 Training and Qualifications for Scaffolders 12 Scaffolding Design 14 Scaffolding Supervision 15 Working at Heights 17 Rescue 18 Falling Objects 19 Slips, Trips and Falls 20 Access...»

«International Journal of Orthodox Theology 5:1 (2014) 9 urn:nbn:de:0276-2014-1027 Nicholas Loudovikos Hell and Heaven, Nature and Person. Chr. Yannaras, D. Stăniloae and Maximus the Confessor Abstract The purpose of the paper is to examine the ontological meaning of Heaven and Hell through Greek Patristic Theology. One can easily discern a judicial element in both Eastern and Western traditions concerning the Kingdom of God, which tends to become juridical if it is not explained in ontological...»

«Berkeley Law Berkeley Law Scholarship Repository The Circuit California Law Review 9-2013 Rehabilitating Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Analysis of Miller v. Alabama Anna K. Christensen Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/clrcircuit Recommended Citation Christensen, Anna K., Rehabilitating Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Analysis of Miller v. Alabama (2013). The Circuit. Paper 21. http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/clrcircuit/21 This Article is brought...»

«USER GUIDE PLATINUM SERIES™ Sound Processor By Advanced Bionics User Guide for the Platinum Series™ Sound Processor PLATINUM SERIES By Advanced Bionics Labeling The symbols below are used on the labeling for the product and for transportation, and their meanings are as follows: CAUTION: Federal law restricts this device to sale, distribution and use by or on the order of a physician. European Community Mark of Conformity Authorized to affix the CE Mark in 2000 REF SN Model Number Serial...»

«This Opinion is a Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: January 26, 2015 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _ In re Thor Tech, Inc. _ Serial No. 85667188 _ B. Joseph Schaeff of Dinsmore & Shohl LLP for Thor Tech, Inc. Bridgett G. Smith, Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 115 (John Lincoski, Managing Attorney). Before Bucher, Bergsman and Adlin, Administrative Trademark Judges. Opinion by Bergsman, Administrative Trademark Judge: Thor Tech, Inc....»

«ESSAY SHALLOW SIGNALS Bert I. Huang CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I. LAW’S HIDDEN PERMISSIONS A. Quiet License 1. Paradox of Monitoring 2. Partial Information 3. Private Permissions B. Quiet Compliance C. Quiet Exceptions D. Quiet Tolerance 1. Legal Transitions 2. Private Enforcers 3. Secrecy and Discretion E. The Observer in Context 1. Sophisticated or Naive? 2. Charitable or Skeptical? II. WHEN LAW OBSCURES LAW A. False Absolutes 1. Reverse of Chilling 2. Crowding Out B. False Sophistication C....»

«Business Etiquette FOR DUMmIES ‰ 2ND EDITION by Sue Fox Business Etiquette For Dummies®, 2nd Edition Published by Wiley Publishing, Inc. 111 River St. Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2008 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.