«1 Digital literacy in higher education: The rhetoric and the reality Lorelle J. Burton, Jane Summers, Jill Lawrence, Karen Noble, and Peter Gibbings ...»
Opportunities to undertake study “anytime, anywhere” have enabled increased access to higher education. However, higher education institutions must develop rigorous systems to support online learning, enabling learning to be contextualised for individual participants. Concomitantly, as the technology continues to evolve, and as lecturers begin to understand the potential of e-learning, it is likely that we will see the emergence of new and more effective approaches to online learning and teaching in the future. There is growing evidence that online learning is a useful tool for higher education if applied with skill. It is the development of skill, for both staff and students that must become a focus, rather than simply supporting information technology innovation.
Technology requirements of higher education have been categorised into three groups. First, technologies to be adopted within the next year or less will include cloud computing, learning analytics, mobile apps and tablet computing. Such technologies enable one to be flexible to change and to process or access larger resources more easily. Second, in the next 2 to 3 years, education should become more student-focussed, enabling individual learners to develop a digital identity while participating in a more personalised educational experience that is tailored to their specific needs. The expectation is that educators will apply more game based learning and open source content and practices to enhance engagement and improve potential learning outcomes. Finally, although technology continues to evolve at a rapid pace, in the next 4 to 5 years, higher education will need to focus on issues such as digital preservation, open online courseware, and telepresence. Institutions need to forward plan and educators need to begin preparing for these emerging technologies now, to enable them to adapt their curricula and teaching approaches in time to meet the needs of future students.
Improvements in the online learning journey are unlikely without some fundamental changes at the institutional level to better support staff. A new paradigm may be required, in which diverse skills of staff and students are recognised and used as a resource, in more flexible organisational structures.
Emerging technologies raise the skill requirements of academics, and successful applications of online learning are dependent on additional skills provided in tandem by other support professionals including instructional designers and media producers, among others.
Conclusion The current data helped to debunk the myth that age determines experience and confidence in using digital learning technologies. Digital Immigrants did not show the assumed low levels of experience with digital learning tools; their experience and confidence was comparable to that of Digital Natives.
Further, the current data highlighted the complexities of quality online learning. This includes recognising the importance of online course design to the student learning experience. Online learning environments should enable the exchange of meaningful ideas to promote critical thinking and reflective learning experiences. This will help to create a sense of community among the online learners.
However, quality online learning is not assured, and requires attention to internal factors such as prior experience and confidence in using digital learning tools, and external factors such as course design, pedagogy, and institutional support, to ensure maximum positive impact.
References Apperley, T., & Walsh, C. (2012), What digital games and literacy have in common: a heuristic for understanding pupil’s gaming literacy, Literacy, 46(3), 115-122.
Andrews, T., & Tynan, B. (2012). Distance learners: Connected, mobile and resourceful individuals.
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 565-579.
Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 65-83.
Aziz, H. (2010). The 5 keys to educational technology: Transforming education through technology.
Retrieved 10 October, 2013 from: http://thejournal.com/articles/2010/09/16/the-5-keys-toeducational-technology.aspx Bawden, D. (2001). Information and Digital Literacies: A Review of Concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218-259.
Beetham, H., McGill, L., & Littlejohn, A. (2009). Thriving in the 21st century: Learning Literacies for the Digital Age (LLiDA project). London: JISC.
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The 'digital natives' debate: A critical review of the evidence.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786. doi:10.1111/j.1467x Buckingham, D. (2010). Defining Digital Literacy. Medienbuilung in neuen Kulturraumen VS Verlag fur Sozialswissnschaften, 59 – 71.
Burdick, A., & Willis, H. (2011, November). Digital learning, digital scholarship and design thinking:
Opportunities for integration. Design Studies, 32(6), 546-556.
Conole, G. (2008). Listening to the learner voice: The ever changing landscape of technology use for
language students. ReCALL, 20(2), 124-140. Retrieved from:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000220 Dahlstrom, E., de Boor, T., Grunwald, P., Vockley, M., & Oblinger, W. A. (2011). The ECAR National Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Centre for Applied Research.
Blended Learning Technology: Connecting with the Online-All-the-Time Student.
Echo360. Retrieved from:
http://echo360.com/sites/all/themes/echo360/files/Connecting_to_the_Online_All_the_Time_ Student.pdf Eynon, R., & Malmberg, L. -E. (2012). Understanding the online information-seeking behaviours of young people: the role of networks of support. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 514-529.
Retrieved December 7, 2012, from www.usq.edu.au Fitzgerald, R., & Steele, J. (2008). Digital learning communities: Investigating the application of social software to support networked learning. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved from: http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/grants_cg_report_dlc_uc_feb09.pdf Gill, S. (2003). Myths and reality of e-learning. Educational Technology, January-February, 20-24.
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010, June). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational
Research Journal, 36(3), 503-520. Retrieved December 7, 2012, from:
http://www.esource.com.au Hockley, N. (2012). Technology for the Language Teacher: Digital Literacies. ELT Journal, Vol 66, Iss 1. pp.
Howland, J. L., & Moore, J. L. (2002). Student Perceptions as Distance Learners in Internet-Based Courses. Distance Education, 23(2), 183 - 195. Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012).
Technology Outlook for Australian Tertiary Education 2012-2017: An NMC Horizon Report Regional Analysis. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
Jones, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Describing or debunking? The net generation and digital natives.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 317-320. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00379.x Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K.-L. (2008). First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Gray, K., Judd, T., Waycott, J., Chang, R., Bishop, A., Maton K. & Krause, K-L. (2009). Educating the net generation: Implications for learning and teaching in
Australian universities: Final report. ALTC. Retrieved from:
http://www.netgen.unimelb.edu.au/outcomes/toolkit.html Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2005). Learners and learning in the 21st century: What do we know about students' attitudes and experiences of ICT that will help us design courses? Studies in Higher Education 30(3), 257-274.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (Eds.). (2008). Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. New York:
Peter Lang Publishing.
Li, Q., & Akins, M. (2004). Sixteen myths about online teaching and learning in higher education: Don’t believe everything you hear. TechTrends, 49(4), 51-60.
Lohnes, S., & Kinzer, C. (2007). Questioning assumptions about students’ expectations for technology in
college classrooms. Innovate, 3(5). Retrieved from:
http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol3_issue5/questioning_assumptions_about_students'_e xpectations_for_technology_in_college_classrooms.pdf Lorenzo, G., Oblinger, D., & Dziuban, C. (2006). How choice, co-creation, and culture are changing what
it means to be net savvy. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 30(1). Retrieved from:
http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ELI3008.pdf Margaryan, A, Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or a reality? University students’ use of digital technologies, Computers and Education, 56 (2), 429-440.
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington DC: U.S.
Department of Education Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service.
Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Student Barriers to Online Learning: A factor analytic study.
Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48.
Nelson, M. R. (2006). Digital content delivery trends in higher education. Boulder, Colorado: Educause.
Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers and Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.
Pegrum, M. (2011). Modified, multiplied and (re) mixed: Social media and digital literacies, in M Thomas (Ed.), Digital Education: Opportunities for Social Collaboration. New York, NT: Palgrave, MacMillan.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
Quinton, S. R. (2010). Principles of Effective Learning Environment Design. In M. Ebner & M. Schiefner (Eds.), Looking toward the future of technology-enhanced education: ubiquitous learning and the digital native (pp. 327-352). Hershey, PA, USA: Information Science Reference.
Rodriguez, M. C., & Ooms, A. (2005). Perceptions of online learning quality given comfort with technology, motivation to learn technology skills, satisfaction, & online learning experience Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2).
Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native - myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364-379.
Sheehan, T. (2012). Developing a digital learning strategy. Ashridge?: Ashridge Business School.
Retrieved December 7, 2012, from www.ashridge.org.uk Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., & Orellana, A. (2011). Distance education research: A review of the literature. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23(2), 124-142.
Stoel, L., & Lee, K. H. (2003). Modeling the effect of experience on student acceptance of Web-based courseware. Internet Research, 13(5), 364.
Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness online: what the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education, Practice and Direction (pp. 13-45).
Sloan Center for Online Education.
Uzun, A., & Senturk, A. (2010). Blending makes the difference: Comparison of blended and traditional instruction on student’s performance and attitudes in computer literacy. Contemporary Educational Technology,6(1), 81-94.
Wold, K., (2013). Collaborative Inquiry: Expert analysis of blended learning in higher education.
International Journal on E-Learning, 12(2), 221–238.
Wood, D. & Dodd, A. (2010). Preparing students and community organisations for effective use of ICT through a service learning initiative. In Curriculum, technology & transformation for an unknown
future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010. Retrieved from: