«Jessica Dorsey and Dr. Christophe Paulussen ICCT Research Paper April 2013 This ICCT conference report provides a detailed overview from the two-day ...»
The Boundaries of the Battlefield: A Critical Look at the Legal Paradigms and Rules in Countering Terrorism 22 Corn, G. and E. T. Jensen. “Transnational Armed Conflict: A ‘Principled’ Approach to the Regulation of Counter-Terror Combat Operations”. Israel Law Review 42, no. 46 (2009).
De Cock, C. “Counter-Insurgency Operations in Afghanistan. What about the ‘Jus Ad Bellum’ and the ‘Jus in Bello’: Is the Law Still Accurate?”. Yearbook Of International Humanitarian Law 13, no. 97 (2010).
Dennis, M. J. “Non-Application of Civil and Political Rights Treaties Extraterritorially during Times of International Armed Conflict”. Israel Law Review 40, no. 453 (2007).
Diamond, E. “Before the Abyss: Reshaping International Humanitarian Law to Suit the Ends of Power”. Israel Law Review 43 (2010).
Droege, C. “The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict”. Israel Law Review 40, no. 310 (2007).
Eden, P. and M. Happold. “Symposium: The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law”. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 14, no. 441 (2009).
Estreicher, S. “Privileging Asymmetric Warfare? Part I: Defender Duties Under International Humanitarian Law”. Chicago Journal of International Law 11, no. 425 (2011).
Estreicher, S. “Privileging Asymmetric Warfare (Part II)?: The 'Proportionality' Principle Under International Humanitarian Law”. Chicago Journal of International Law, Forthcoming, NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper 11-32 (2011).
Estreicher, S. “Privileging Asymmetric Warfare (Part III)?: The Intentional Killing of Civilians Under International Humanitarian Law”. Chicago Journal of International Law, Forthcoming, NYU School of Law (2011).
Fleck, D. ed. The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Fleck, D. ed. The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Geiß, R. and M. Siegrist. “Has the Armed Conflict in Afghanistan Affected the Rules on the Conduct of Hostilities?”.
International Review of the Red Cross 93, no. 11 (2011).
Giladi, R. “The Jus Ad Bellum/Jus in Bello Distinction and the Law of Occupation”. Israel Law Review 41, Hebrew University International Law Research Paper no. 18-08 (2008).
Gill, T. “The Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice and the Fundamental Distinction between the Jus Ad Bellum and the Jus in Bello”. Leiden Journal of International Law 12, no. 613 (1999).
Glazier, D. “Playing by the Rules: Combating Al Qaeda within the Law of War”. William and Mary Law Review 51, no. 957, 1017 (2009).
Greenwood, C. “International Law and the Pre-Emptive use of Force: Afghanistan, Al-Qaeda, and Iraq”. San Diego International Law Journal 4, no. 7 (2003).
Gregory, D. “The Everywhere War”, The Geographical Journal 177, no. 3 (2011).
Henderson, C. “The 2010 United States National Security Strategy and the Obama Doctrine of ‘Necessary Force”. Journal Conflict and Security Law 15, no. 403 (2010).
Henderson, I. “Civilian Intelligence Agencies and the use of Armed Drones”. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 2010, 133 (T.M.C. Asser Press, 2011).
Holland, E. “The Qualification Framework of International Humanitarian law: Too Rigid to Accommodate Contemporary Conflicts?”. Suffolk Transnational Law Review 34, no. 145 (2011).
International Humanitarian Law Research Initiative 1, no. 27 (2003).
Kolb, R. “Origin of the Twin Terms Jus Ad bellum/jus in Bell”. International Review of the Red Cross 37, no. 553 (1997).
Kreß, C. “Some Reflections on the International Legal Framework Governing Transnational Armed Conflicts”. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 15, no. 245 (2010).
Kretzmer, D. “Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions Or Legitimate Means of Defence?”. European Journal of International Law 16, no. L. 171 (2005).
Kriss, D.S. “Law Enforcement as a Counter-terrorism Tool”. Journal of National Security Law and Policy 5, no.1 (2011).
Lewis, M. “Drones and the Boundaries of the Battlefield”. Texas International Law Journal 47, no. 2(2011).
Lubell, N. Extraterritorial Use Of Force Against Non-State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
Lubell, N. “Parallel Application of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: An Examination of the Debate”. Israel Law Review 40, no. 648 (2007).
Lubell, N., Nathan Derejko. “The Global Battlefield: Drones and the Geographical Extension of Armed Conflict”. Journal of International Criminal Justice (forthcoming).
Lubell, N. “The War against Al-Qaeda”. In E. Wilmshurst, ed. International Law and the Classification of Conflicts Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2012.
Lucas, G. R. Jr. “New Rules for New Wars: International Law and just War Doctrine for Irregular War”. Case Western Reserve Journal International Law 43, no. 677 (2010-2011).
Margulies, P. “The Fog of War Reform: Change and Structure in the Law of Armed Conflict After September 11”. Roger Williams University Legal Studies Paper. 110 (2011).
Martin, C. “Going Medieval: Targeted Killing, Self-Defence, and the Jus Ad Bellum Regime”. In C. Finkelstein, J. Ohlin, and A.
Altman, eds. Targeted Killing: Law and Morality in an Asymmetrical World. Oxford: Oxford University Press (2012).
McLaughlin, R. “The Law of Armed Conflict and International Human Rights Law: Some Paradigmatic Differences and Operational Implications”. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 13, no. 213 (2010).
McNeal, G. The US Practice of Collateral Damage Estimation and Mitigation (2011).
Melzer, N. Targeted Killing in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Michael, B. “Responding to Attacks by Non-State Actors: The Attribution Requirement of Self-Defence”. Australian International Law Journal 16, no. 133 (2009).
Milanovic, M. “Lessons for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in the War on Terror: Comparing Hamdan and the Israeli Targeted Killings Case”. International Review of the Red Cross 89, no. 373 (2007).
Milanovic, M. “Norm Conflicts, International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law”. Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law: Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law 19, no.1 (2010).
Moussa, J. “Can Jus Ad Bellum Override Jus in Bello? Reaffirming the Separation of the Two Bodies of Law”. International Review of the Red Cross 90, no. 963 (2008).
O’Connell, M. E. “The Choice of Law Against Terrorism”. National Security Law and Policy 4, no. 343 (2010).
O’Connell, M.E. “Defining Armed Conflict”. Journal of Conflict and Security Law 13, no. 393 (2008).
O’Connell, M.E. “Seductive Drones: Learning from a Decade of Lethal Operations-Comment”. Journal of Law, Information and Science (2011).
The Boundaries of the Battlefield: A Critical Look at the Legal Paradigms and Rules in Countering Terrorism 24 O’Connell, M.E. “Unlawful Killing with Combat Drones: A Case Study of Pakistan, 2004-2009”. Notre Dame Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper 09-43 (July 2010).
O’Connell, M.E. “When is a War Not a War-the Myth of the Global War on Terror”. Journal of International and Comparative Law 12, no. 535 (2005).
Okimoto, K. The Distinction and Relationship between Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. Oxford: Hart, 2011.
Okimoto, K. “The Cumulative Requirements of Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello”. China Journal of International Law 11, no. 1 (2012).
Osterdahl, I. “Dangerous Liaison? The Disappearing Dichotomy between Jus Ad Bellum and in Bello”. Nordic Journal of International Law 78, no. 553 (2009).
Padmanabhan V., and J. Bellinger. “Detention Operations in Contemporary Conflicts: Four Challenges for the Geneva Conventions and Other Existing Law”. Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper 318 (2010).
Paust, J. “Self-Defence Targetings of Non-State Actors and Permissibility of US use of Drones in Pakistan”. Journal of Transnational Law and Policy 19, no. 2, 237 (2010).
Prud'homme, N. “Lex Specialis: Oversimplifying a More Complex and Multifaceted Relationship”. 40 Israel Law Review 356 (2007).
Quenivet, N. “The ‘War on Terror’ and the Principle of Distinction in International Humanitarian Law”. Colombian Yearbook of International Law (2010).
Ratner, S. R. “Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello After September 11”. American Journal of International Law 96, no. 905 (2002).
Reinold, T. “State Weakness, Irregular Warfare, and the Right to Self-Defence Post-9/11”. American Journal of Itnernational Law 244 (2011).
Roscini, M. “The United Nations Security Council and the Enforcement of International Humanitarian Law”. Israel Law Review 43, no. 330 (2010).
Sassoli, M. “Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law”.
Journal of International Humanitarian Law Studies 1, no. 5 (2010).
Schabas, W. A. “Lex Specialis-Belt and Suspenders-the Parallel Operation of Human Rights Law and the Law of Armed Conflict, and the Conundrum of Jus Ad Bellum”. Israel Law Review 40, no. 592 (2007).
Schmitt, M.N. “Drone Attacks Under the Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello: Clearing the 'Fog of Law'”. Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law 13 (Cambridge/Asser) December 2010.
Schmitt, M.N. “The Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities: A Critical Analysis”. Harvard National Security Journal 1, no. 5, 39–43 (2010).
Shah, N. “Targeting with Drone Technology: Humanitarian Law Implications”. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law 105 (2011).
Shaw, M. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Sivakumaran, S. “Re-Envisaging the International Law of Internal Armed Conflict”. European Journal of International Law 22, no. 219 (2011).
Sivakumaran, S. “Re-Envisaging the International Law of Internal Armed Conflict: A Rejoinder to Gabriella Blum”. European Journal International Law 22, no. 273 (2011).
War”. Yale Journal of International Law 34, no. 47 (2009).
Stahn, C. “Jus Ad Bellum, Jus In Bello...Jus Post Bellum’?–Rethinking the Conception of the Law of Armed Force”. European Journal of International Law 17, no. 921 (2006).
Szabó, K. Anticipatory Action in Self-Defence: The Law of Self-Defence - Past, Present and Future. The Hague: Asser Press, 2011.
Thynne, K. “Targeting the 'Terrorist Enemy: The Boundaries of an Armed Conflict Against Transnational Terrorists”. Australian International Law Journal 16, no. 167 (2009).
Waxman, M. C. “The Structure of Terrorism Threats and the Laws of War”. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 20, no. 429 (2010).
Tomuschat, C. “Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law”. European Journal International Law 21, no. 15 (2010).
U.N. Human Rights Council and P. Alston, U.N. “Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary Or Arbitrary Executions”. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/14/24/Add.6 (28 May 2010).
Vogel, R. J. “Drone Warfare and the Law of Armed Conflict”. Denver Journal or International Law and Policy 101, no. 109 (2010).
Wachtel, H. A. “Targeting Osama Bin Laden: Examining the Legality of Assassination as a Tool of US Foreign Policy”. Duke Law Journal 55, no. 677 (2005).
Waldron, J. J. “Can Targeted Killing Work as a Neutral Principle?”. New York University School of Law, Public Law Research Paper 11-20 (2011).
Watkin, K. “Controlling the use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict”. American Journal of International Law 1 (2004).
Weissbrodt, D. “The Role of the Human Rights Committee in Interpreting and Developing Humanitarian Law”. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 31, no. 1185 (2010).
Wilde, R. “Triggering State Obligations Extraterritorially: The Spatial Test in Certain Human Rights Treaties”. Israel Law Review 40, no. 503 (2007).
Yoo, J. “Assassination Or Targeted Killings After 9/11”. New York University School of Law Review 56, no. 57 (2011).
Yuile, A. “At the Fault-Lines of Armed Conflict: The 2006 Israel-Hezbollah Conflict and the Framework of International