FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 17 | 18 || 20 | 21 |   ...   | 22 |

«LEGAL AND ETHICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ASTRONAUTS IN SPACE SOJOURNS Proceedings 29 October 2004 House of UNESCO 125, avenue de Suffren, Paris 7e Legal and ...»

-- [ Page 19 ] --

responsibilities of the Commander onboard the ISS, are obviously not relevant to the activities of the astronaut while on the ground, training for the flight or conducting activities on return from the ISS, although the Commander at these stages is still “directing the activities of the ISS Crew Members as a single integrated team to ensure the successful completion of the mission.” In addition, the requirements outlined in regulations pertaining to the space vehicle used by the crew member must also be observed. The ISS Code of Conduct applies to visiting crew members who will be staying on the ISS for only few days: the basic idea is that, while on board for a visit or for a full long-duration mission (expedition), all crew members are covered by the same legal prescriptions and are subject to the authority of the Commander. Private gains

The ISS Code of Conduct stipulates that a crew member must refrain from any use of that status motivated by private gain. This requirement is not limited in time but it was understood that each Agency will have to deal with the conditions applicable to post employment activities of astronauts and determine what is acceptable in terms of compensation, for example in the form of bonuses or special remuneration for non-government agents. Making a distinction between personal effects and mementos that could be carried on board by the crew members, the Agencies agreed that constraints of manifest, safety and stowage allocation were already sufficient and that there was no need for the ISS Code of Conduct to spell out the discretion exercisable by an Agency in this regard. Harassment

Some of the officials involved in the drafting of the ISS Code of Conduct were adamant that “zero tolerance” must be enforced in or on the ISS for interpersonal or group harassment, as an express provision of the ISS Code of Conduct. The discussion showed the difficulty of harmonising the Partners’ respective legal concepts of harassment in a multi-national environment. In order to accommodate the multiplicity of views, it was decided to repeat in the general rules of conduct for the crew member outlined in Section II of the ISS Code of Conduct a sentence originally drafted for the next section pertaining to the Commander’s responsibilities.

This sentence calls for the need to “maintain a harmonious and cohesive relationship among the crew and assure an appropriate level of mutual confidence and respect.” In other words, the Agencies recognised that such language would make the application of sanctions possible in case where the MCOP determined that harassment had taken place. Authority of the Commander over payloads

An issue discussed during the negotiations of the ISS Code of Conduct was whether or not the authority of the Commander should extend to payloads and be put in relation with the Commander’s responsibility to preserve the safety of the crew and the ISS. Also interesting in this context is to note that an explicit interpretative sentence has been added stating that nothing in the relevant section of the ISS Code of Conduct would affect the designation by the MCOP of an individual of any Partner State to be a Commander.145 This addition has the double advantage of being the first recognition in writing at such a high level of the rotation principle for designation of the Commander and the fact that no national of a non-Partner State can become Commander.

–  –  – Use of force onboard the ISS Despite long discussions on the matter, the negotiators did not include an explicit reference in the ISS Code of Conduct to the possibility for theCommander to make some use of force, thus contending that the reference to the right of the Commander to use “reasonable and necessary means” to discharge his or her responsibilities was sufficient to cover that possibility. It was agreed, however, that the minutes of the MCB meeting dedicated to the approval of the ISS Code of Conduct would contain an interpretative statement to the effect that reasonable and necessary means may include the use by the Commander of proportional physical force or restraint, where necessary to ensure the immediate safety of the ISS Crew Member or the ISS itself. Proprietary and export-controlled data generated in or on the ISS

The Agencies examined the need to protect data generated by activities conducted in or on the ISS when such data could be considered to be “proprietary” or “export-controlled”. They agreed that it is up to each Cooperating Agency, or the data owner or provider to give instruction to their astronauts for the marking of data generated onboard the ISS, and consequently trigger the application of the protective measures provided for in Article 19.4 of the IGA. The Partners were, for all practical purposes, extending the marking procedure to data that were not necessarily to be exported or otherwise transferred to another Cooperating Agency. Such an extension of the original scope of the marking, justified by paragraph 8 of Article 19 calling for the establishment of guidelines pertaining to the security of information, was deemed necessary because of the presence onboard the ISS at any given time of crew members of more than one Partner. Legal basis for implementation of the ISS Code of Conduct

The Agencies have been interested by the steps to be taken on a solid legal basis in order to persuade astronauts to abide by the rules outlined in the ISS Code of Conduct, albeit on a voluntary basis, as part of additional terms and conditions enabling them to pursue astronaut activities as employees of a Cooperating Agency. These steps are necessary to eliminate doubt as to the right of an Agency to require an astronaut to abide by these rules when assigned to an ISS expedition or possibly face the prescribed sanction in case of their violation.

The ISS Code of Conduct has been implemented in ESA, on behalf of the ISS European Partner States, through a directive of the ESA Director General addressed individually to the members of the European Astronaut Corps (EAC) in which they were invited to agree in writing to the terms and conditions of the ISS Code of Conduct, a process which is set out in the ESA Staff Regulations and the ESA Astronaut Policy, both sets of rules governing the employment of the astronauts.

In the United States, the ISS Code of Conduct has become part of the United States astronauts’ terms and conditions of employment through the adoption on 1 October 2000 of corresponding regulation under NASA’s existing legislation. In Japan, the ISS Code of Conduct has been incorporated into regulations consistent with the terms of the legislation that established the National Development Space Agency (NASDA) and Japanese astronauts, at the time employees of NASDA (which has been succeeded by JAXA), have been invited to sign up to the terms of the ISS Code of Conduct. Similarly in Russia, the cosmonauts were invited to sign up individually to the terms of the ISS Code of Conduct, once it became part of the regulations and policies applicable to the Russian Space Agency (now Roskosmos). In Canada, where astronauts are appointed by decision of the Cabinet, the ISS Code of Conduct became part of the terms and conditions of astronauts’ employment through adoption of an Order in Council by the Cabinet.

Legal and ethical framework for astronauts in space sojourns

3. Criminal jurisdiction The issue of criminal jurisdiction in the IGA is undoubtedly the most complex of all when examined from the angle of its potential to affect astronauts. It has to be remembered that in many countries, an astronaut enjoys national hero status and is often referred to as an envoy of mankind to outer space. Among the procedures applied in the selection of astronauts, whether professional astronauts or spaceflight participants, background checks make sure that candidates not only have no criminal record but show no propensity for criminal or otherwise deviant behaviour. The possibility of any crime being committed in or on the ISS is therefore extremely remote.

With the arrival of Russia in the partnership in the mid 1990’s, it became obvious that Article 22 of the IGA concluded by the four founding Partners in 1988 had to be amended to bring its provisions into line with the spirit of genuine partnership, and amendments gradually took shape throughout the negotiation process leading to the new IGA signed on 29 January 1998.

3.1 Basis for criminal prosecution: State of nationality exercises jurisdiction

Drawing on certain precedents in international law, the Partner States confirmed that the primary basis for exercising jurisdiction, which means initiating prosecution by a Partner State’s competent authorities, was the nationality of the alleged perpetrator. Thus, each Partner State has to make sure that it has taken appropriate measures in its national legal system to enable its competent authorities to initiate criminal prosecution against an astronaut of that State’s nationality, and also enable the competent courts to actually exercise jurisdiction over the case, when receiving evidence that the astronaut concerned may have committed a particular criminal act included in the various categories of criminal acts designated, by that State, to be subject to prosecution when committed onboard the ISS. In other words, the ISS Partner States have to consider measures not only to actually exercise their criminal jurisdiction but also to categorise the crimes which will be targeted for prosecution. In this connection, the United States have proclaimed that only the crimes established pursuant to United States Federal statutes are applicable onboard the ISS.

3.2 Accessory jurisdiction of the victim State

As an alternative, although a fairly remote one as we will see later, provisions were developed allowing any “affected” Partner State other than the one of nationality to exercise criminal jurisdiction over an alleged perpetrator in case of misconduct that had caused damage to its flight element or had been directed against the life or safety of a crew member who was a national of an affected Partner State. The actual exercise of criminal jurisdiction by an affected Partner State is conditional on its consulting with the State of nationality, the latter being under an obligation to agree to such consultation, and receiving concurrence from that State in such exercise of jurisdiction or on the latter’s failure to provide assurances that it will submit the case to its competent authorities for the purpose of prosecution146.

146 At the occasion of the discussion of the Canadian Bill pertaining to the ratification of the IGA by Canada, a senator argued that the IGA may have the effect of subjecting Canadian astronauts to the death penalty applied by the United States. This remark reflected the preoccupation of a number of ISS Partner States voiced during the negotiations. However, it has to be emphasised that the possibility for the United States to prosecute a non-United States national astronaut, or to prosecute that astronaut for a crime sanctioned by the death penalty, is so remote as to be practically non existent. First, the exercise of jurisdiction pursuant to Article 22.2 of the IGA by any Partner

–  –  –

3.3 Considerations related to the exercise of criminal jurisdiction A number of issues related to the exercise of criminal jurisdiction as envisaged in the IGA were extensively discussed, without necessarily having been reflected in Article 22. One was the possibility of establishing an outright obligation on the State of landing to take appropriate means to ensure the immediate return of the alleged perpetrator to his or her State of nationality, pending any dealings between that State and any affected Partner State concerning their respective prosecutorial interests, these dealings possibly extending for a number of months.

Extradition was also discussed in the context of the redrafting of Article 22 of the IGA. It was decided that the IGA could, at the discretion of the Partner States concerned if applicable laws would allow it, serve as a basis for proceeding with the extradition of an alleged perpetrator from the territory of a Partner State to that of another if the Partner States concerned had not otherwise established an extradition agreement.

A further addition made to Article 22 was a general reference to the obligation for the Partner States to extend to each other legal assistance in cases covered by its provisions, subject to their respective national laws and regulations. The relevance of this clause is obvious because there will be a need, in some instance,s to bring back to earth from the ISS, and then transfer from the State of landing to the State exercising criminal jurisdiction pursuant to Article 22, some exhibits for submission as evidence in a criminal trial.

Finally, although the matters dealt with in the ISS Code of Conduct and the exercise of criminal jurisdiction should not normally overlap, clarification was added in Article 22 to stress that the Partners do not intend, through the application of Article 22, to limit the authorities and procedures for the maintenance of order and the conduct of crew activities established in the ISS Code of Conduct and, conversely, that the ISS Code of Conduct is not intended to limit the exercise of criminal jurisdiction pursuant to Article 22.

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 17 | 18 || 20 | 21 |   ...   | 22 |

Similar works:

«Geological Methods in Mineral Exploration and Mining Roger Marjoribanks Geological Methods in Mineral Exploration and Mining Second Edition 123 Roger Marjoribanks 27A Axford Street Perth WA 6152 Australia marjex@ozemail.com.au ISBN 978-3-540-74370-5 e-ISBN 978-3-540-74375-0 DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-74375-0 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2010926490 © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1997, 2010 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are...»

«Proving disability and Proving Disability and Reasonable Adjustments A guide to evidence under the Equality Act 2010 October 2014 Proving disability and reasonable adjustments 2 Table of contents Introduction 5 Overview of Equality Act 7 The wide scope of „disability‟ under the EqA 8 Disability discrimination under the EqA 8 Who is “disabled” under the EqA? 12 The legal definition: overview 12 Special cases – where disability is automatically covered 20 Particular issues which may...»

«P.SH 36/13 PROCUREMENT REVIEW PANEL, appointed by the President Pursuant to the article 105 and article 106 of the Law on Public Procurement in Kosova no. 04/L-042 consisting of Mr. Hysni Hoxha-President, Mr. Tefik Sylejmanireferent, Mr. Osman Kryeziumember, deciding on the complaint lodged by the EO NPSH “DOLPHIN”, regarding the procurement activity “Maintenance and Cleaning of Police Facilities” for Lot 1, with procurement no. 214/12/931/211, initiated by the Contracting Authority...»

«A system for semi-automated testing in industrial practice Master of Science thesis in Software Engineering Duy Huynh Stefan Spasov Chalmers University of Technology University of Gothenburg Department of Computer Science & Engineering Gothenburg, Sweden 2015 The Authors grant to Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg the non-exclusive right to publish the Work electronically and in a non-commercial purpose make it accessible on the Internet. The Authors warrant that...»

«SAN JOSE DE CALASANZ Por Severino Giner Guerri BIBLIOTECA DE AUTORES CRISTIANOS MADRID, MCMLXXXV Con licencia del Arzobispado de Madrid-Alcalá (31-V-1 985) © Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos, de la Editorial Católica, S. A. Madrid, 1985. Mateo Inurria, 15. Depósito legal M-23.723-1985. ISBN 84-220-1194-8. Impreso en España. Severino Giner – San José de Calasanz Contenido 1 UNA INFANCIA FELIZ 1.1 PERALTA DE LA SAL 1.2 EN EL REINO DE ARAGÓN 1.3 LA FAMILIA CALASANZ-GASTÓN 1.4 NACIMIENTO...»

«I assume that one thing most lawyers know about is coffee, so here's my Friday afternoon question: 12 Cup Coffeemaker with a Drip Basket, like a Mr. Coffee You only want to make 2 cups You have a standard size coffee scoop I guess you use 12 16 oz water How many scoops of coffee to make a good cup of coffee? Help! I'm sleepless in St. Louis! Ah, what an interesting question. Well, as all good lawyers know, it depends. Some coffee makers have a special setting for under 4 cups of coffee. Others...»

«ALM: An Asperity-based Likelihood Model for California Stefan Wiemer and Danijel Schorlemmer Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich, Switzerland Contact: Stefan@sed.ethz.ch, danijel@sed.ethz.ch Oct. 2005 Submitted to Seismol. Res. Lettes. Abstract We propose a quasi-stationary earthquake likelihood model for California based on the assumption that small-scale (5 – 15 km) spatial variations in b-value of the Gutenberg-Richter law are meaningful for forecasting future seismicity. Because...»

«MISJUDGING Chris Guthrie* INTRODUCTION Judging is difficult. This is obviously so in cases where the law is unclear or the facts are uncertain. But even in those cases where the law is as clear as it can be, and where the relevant facts have been fully developed, judges might still have difficulty getting it right. Why do judges misjudge? Judges, I will argue, possess three sets of blinders: informational blinders, cognitive blinders, and attitudinal blinders. These blinders make adjudication...»

«THE LAWS AND RULES REGULATING LICENSING OF ELECTRICIANS AND INSPECTION OF ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS Minnesota Electrical Act Minnesota Statutes Chapter 326B, sections 326B.31 to 326B.399 Enforcement Minnesota Statutes Chapter 326B, sections 326B.081 to 326B.085 Minnesota Board of Electricity Rules Minnesota Rules Chapter 3800 Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry Rules Minnesota Rules Chapter 3801 OFFICE LOCATION 443 Lafayette Road North Saint Paul, MN 55155 Phone (651) 284-5064 Fax (651)...»

«On Process Tailoring An Agile Example Master of Science Thesis in Software Engineering Abdallah Salameh Chalmers University of Technology University of Gothenburg Department of Computer Science and Engineering Göteborg, Sweden, April 2011 The Author grants to Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg the non-exclusive right to publish the Work electronically and in a non-commercial purpose make it accessible on the Internet. The Author warrants that he/she is the author to...»

«The Queensland Environmental Law Association 2007 Conference Proceedings Your System or Mine? Peppers Salt Resort and Spa Kingscliff, northern New South Wales 16 18 May 2007 Major Sponsor Your System or Mine? Conference Theme In recognition of the QELA 2007 Conference being held in New South Wales, part of the program is devoted to a comparative analysis of the planning and environment regimes operating in Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria with a view to ascertaining whether there are...»

«1 Is there a supernatural dimension, a world beyond the one we know? Is there life after death? Do angels exist? Can our dreams contain messages from Heaven? Can we tap into ancient secrets of the supernatural? Are healing miracles real? Sid Roth has spent over 35 years researching the strange world of the supernatural. Join Sid for this edition of It’s Supernatural. SID: Hello. Sid Roth here. Welcome to my world where it’s naturally supernatural. All of us have prayed and sometimes felt,...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.