WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 15 | 16 || 18 | 19 |   ...   | 20 |

«HELPING CHILDREN EXPOSED TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: LAW ENFORCEMENT AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS FINAL REPORT to The National Institute of Justice American ...»

-- [ Page 17 ] --

• Feedback is rewarding for the officers. The law enforcement leaders were impressed with the dedication of MHS and the feedback provided to officers regarding their referral. In one department, MHS statistics were posted for the officers to see.

Several concerns and challenges were also mentioned by the law enforcement leaders.

• Communication. Making sure information regarding the program is communicated through the ranks to patrol officers was mentioned as a continuous challenge.

• The importance of not overwhelming MHS. The importance of a 24-hour response by MHS was questioned. They believed the therapists could contact the family within several days of the incident rather than immediately. Often, families did not want services the night of the incident.

• Additional time commitment by officers. There was a concern about officers being taken out of service if they need to wait for MHS to arrive. To date, however, this has not been a major problem.

• Providing data for the evaluation. This has been a challenge for all the law enforcement agencies involved. At the time of the site visit, close coordination and collaboration between the evaluators and agencies had address many of the problems related to data collection.

PERCEPTIONS OF THE LINE OFFICERS

The following short descriptions of four focus groups of three to five officers reveal challenges they face when responding to domestic violence cases and their thoughts about the program.

Focus group #1 When the officers arrive at the scene, the home or apartment is usually small and crowded.

Most often they assume the children have seen or heard the violence. They often look to the child’s demeanor to reveal the extent to which the child was exposed to violence. They talk to the parent and make the call to MHS. They may encounter cultural issues since some cultures do not like outsiders getting involved in their family business. Initially skeptical about the program, they were worried that the program would be time consuming in terms of demanding additional paperwork and requiring them to remain at the scene. However, unlike other past programs and organizations, officers reported that MHS has responded quickly. Their supervisors review their reports to make sure they called the program. If an officer reports a child was present at the scene, but did not call MHS, the supervisor has the officer make the call later.

Officers receive a letter from MHS indicating a referral was made, but they do not learn if the family accepts the services. They would like to know if the child is actually in services, but understand that due to confidentiality concerns they are unable to receive this information. The officers would like one central number to call to make all referrals. Often they need to give several organizations the same information, thereby having to repeat it multiple times. The officers said they would like to see this program work. They hope this program is helping the children and stopping the cycle of violence.

Focus Group #2

Officers reported that the majority of the parents are receptive to the services of the program.

The officers say they call the program in every case in which children are exposed to domestic violence. Officers explain to the parents that MHS is not being called to evaluate their parenting skills nor are they going to remove their children. The officers believe it is not imperative that MHS respond in the middle of the night. The officers like the feedback from MHS and would welcome more if possible.

Focus Group #3 Officers were very impressed with the response of MHS. When MHS says they will come to the scene they do, and they do so quickly. There is no “run around” like other agencies. If they tell a family that someone is going to come and help them and then no one visits the family, the officer credibility is undermined. Sometimes, however, they do not believe the children need help immediately. It was their perception that MHS usually comes to the scene within the hour.

Typically, at the scene, the officer moves the children into a room away from the parent(s) and asks them what happened. However, they feel that officers often are not experienced in dealing with the children and trauma. They try to promote the program to families as “free services that will help your children” and “they will come to your house at your leisure.” Officers would like to receive more feedback regarding the case and if someone came to help the children. The letters from MHS have not always been consistent in every case. They believe the program will survive based on the police participation. Like other officers, they wish there was one central number to call. Officers indicated that possible incentives for officers to do “one more thing,” such as making the referral, include giving an award or recognition, feedback, thank you or holiday card, and a quarterly report of how their department uses the program. Sometimes they forget to call if it is not domestic violence (e.g., if it is a school incident). Officers have received positive feedback from the parents when they have gone back to the house. They have respect for the specialists for going into dangerous neighborhoods.

Focus group #4

One major challenge these officers have faced is that many residents in their district do not have telephones. They like the feedback they have been receiving from MHS, but would like more.





When dealing with cases that might not be appropriate for referral, the officers reported that they prefer to make the call to MHS and let the specialists’ screen out inappropriate calls. They said they participate in the program because they care. If there is a chance this program will make a difference in children’s lives, then the extra effort is worth it.

THE CRISIS RESPONSE

The crisis response is delivered by Mental Health Services (MHS), Inc., a non-profit agency that operates adult, adolescent, and child mobile crisis teams. The agency provides on-site services to deal with the stress of traumatic events. MHS has approximately six full-time equivalent master’s level crisis intervention specialists who are trained in providing services to children who are exposed to domestic violence. There are additional staff who assist with supervision as well as administrative and voucher functions. The major components of their program are outlined below.

The 24-hour Hotline and Subsequent Phone Calls

The MHS agency has a 24-hour hotline number for the CWWV Program. The referral to MHS is made by either an officer or dispatcher who contacts the hotline either from the scene or from the department. Officers have been trained to provide very specific information to the hotline. The hotline number is also on the pamphlet officers provide to parents and can also be called by the parent. Two crisis specialists are on-call at all times. The hotline worker notifies an on-call specialist about the incident. The specialist calls the officer directly to obtain more information on the case.

The specialist also calls the parent at home and explains the program to the parent. The specialist makes it clear that he or she is not with the Department of Child and Family Services. This is important because often parents fear Department of Child and Family Services involvement will result in their losing custody of their children. The specialist explains that the agency’s focus is on helping the child and the family.

The Team

Originally, the program called for one specialist to go to the scene, but this was quickly changed to a two-person team to accommodate safety concerns. A benefit of having two specialists on the scene is that one specialist can focus on the adult victim and the other on the child(ren). Two specialists are also useful because often these families have multiple children of different ages.

Children at different developmental stages have different immediate needs. It is difficult for one specialist to talk with the parent and deal with several children at the same time, especially when the family is distraught. If the family is large with multiple children, they may use three or four specialists. The program believes that the input of the parent is critical to help the specialist assess the children.

Prior to going to the scene, the team calls the parent to make sure that he or she wants them to come to the home. The specialists try to get to the scene within 30 minutes of the police referral.

The crisis intervention and referral process that the team provides is generally done in an average of three visits.1 The visits are usually to the house unless it is deemed unsafe, in which case a neutral location is selected.

The First Visit

The immediate goals of the first visit are for the specialists to gain rapport with the family and make sure they are safe. These goals are met by doing whatever is necessary to help the family at that time (e.g., helping bathe the children and get them in bed). The specialists strive to present themselves as true helpers and to be as least threatening as possible.

The first visit can last from ten minutes to three hours. During the initial visit, the specialists work with the family on safety planning. One specialist talks with the victim and the other with the children. The specialist engages the children in play, art, or sand therapy using materials the specialist brought with him or her. The specialists observe the children and the interaction between the parent and children. If the perpetrator is present, they may talk to him or her about the effects of the children being exposed to the violence.

In July 1999, statistics show that during that month 3.5 contacts were made on average with each family, with a range from one to 16 contacts per family.

Several instruments are employed during each visit. The victim is asked to sign a consent form for treatment and research. Occasionally a parent does not want to participate in the study. The specialists stress to the parent that they have an opportunity to affect the types of services that children can receive. This information may empower the parent and encourage them to participate. Some parents have even found that answering questions from the assessments has been helpful to them. If a parent refuses to participate in the study, the family still receives services. Each child is assessed for trauma symptoms and an initial visit checklist is completed.

Additional assessment forms are completed depending on the child’s age. Individual sand and art therapy are employed and assessments are made. The specialist works with the parent to get more information about the child and the child’s behavior. If however, the family is in crisis, the specialists may not conduct or complete all the tests. They must also consider the children’s attention span. Their first goal is to simply meet the family’s needs. Prior to leaving, the team makes a second appointment with the parent.

The team learned early on not to take “no” as an answer from the families. They go out of their way to locate families. If the parent is not home when they visit, they leave a card that indicates they stopped by and were sorry they missed the parent.

Frustrations mentioned by specialists include not being called by officers when they should be, being called a significant amount of time later than the incident occurred (the incident may occur at 9 p.m., but they are called at 3 a.m. when the officer gets off his or her shift), and not being allowed into the home, even when they know the officer and parent are in the house.

The Second and Third Visit

During the second and third visits, individual sand, play, and art therapy are continued, several different assessments are conducted, and the safety plan is reviewed. During these visits, the specialists determine the needs of the family, discuss on-going available services, and work within individual family preferences. On the third visit, the community service provider accompanies the specialists to talk to the family about community resources. By the end of the third visit, MHS finds that they usually have retained 80 percent of their clients. Most often, families that have made it to the third visit are open to receiving long-term services.

Case Example

A domestic violence incident occurred between a husband and wife. Six children were present when the incident occurred. The husband, who was the perpetrator, was arrested and jailed. The victim went to the hospital to be treated for injuries sustained from being struck in the face and head. On the night of this incident, MHS was called at approximately 2:00 a.m. and a specialist went to the family residence, a hotel where they had lived for over a year. When no one answered the door, the specialist slid a note under the door and explained why she had come and that she would return in the morning. In the morning, she returned with several other specialists. The mother agreed to accept services and to participate in the program. During the first visit, the specialists began interviewing and assessing the mother, six children, and a male youth from the neighborhood who essentially lived with the family. Because the boy spent most of his time with the family and had been exposed to violence, the specialists believed that he should be interviewed and assessed to determine if he needed services.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 15 | 16 || 18 | 19 |   ...   | 20 |


Similar works:

«CHHABRA_JCI(2)-1.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 4/23/13 12:16 PM SUPERPOWER RESPONSIBILITY FOR STATE RECOGNITION: CHARTING A COURSE FOR NAGORNO-KARABAKH Amit K. Chhabra* “With great power comes great responsibility.” Peter Parker, Spiderman (2002)1 “To recognize a community as a State is to declare that it fulfills the conditions of statehood as required by international law. If these conditions are present, existing States are under the duty to grant recognition.” Hersch Lauterpacht, Recognition...»

«1 Between Public Interest and Private Good: Protection of Third Parties in Environmental Mediation and Consent Decrees (With Particular Application to Mining Conflicts) In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Masters of Law Program Ateneo Law School Teresita Asuncion M. Lacandula-Rodriguez School Year 2013-2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract.. i Chapter One: Introduction. 1 I. A. Background of the Study. 1 B. Thesis Statement.. 2 C. Definition of Terms.. 3 D. Objectives.,. 3 E....»

«Legal Aspects of Cybersecurity Artur Appazov Faculty of Law University of Copenhagen Contents 1 Purpose and Scope 2 Executive Summary 3 General Introductory Remarks 4 Legal Problematics 4.1 Sovereignty and Jurisdictional Fragmentation 4.2 Attribution: Determining the Responsibility for Harmful Conduct 5 Cybersecurity as an Umbrella Concept 5.1 Cybercrime and Cybercrime Tools 5.2 Hacking and Hacktivism 5.3 Cyberwar and Cyberterrorism 5.4 Cyberespionage – the Advanced Persistent Threat 6 Legal...»

«The Law President Obama’s Signing Statements and the Expansion of Executive Power JEFFREY CROUCH American University MARK J. ROZELL George Mason University MITCHEL A. SOLLENBERGER University of Michigan-Dearborn Barack Obama campaigned for president of the United States on a promise of fidelity to the Constitution and stated that he would not issue any signing statements to revise legislative intent. His vision of the presidency stood in marked contrast to President George W. Bush’s...»

«BPMN 2.0 Handbook Second Edition Digital Edition © Extracted with permission from BPMN 2.0 Handbook Second Edition 2012 Full International Copyright. Published by Future Strategies Inc. USA www.FutStrat.com COPYRIGHT INFORMATION © Future Strategies Inc. This book is published in digital format. The content of this book is fully copyrighted under international copyright law and may not be distributed or data extracted therefrom without written permission by the publisher, Future Strategies...»

«[Type text] Handouts for Constitutional Law Professor Rosen 1 Goals of this Class I. Basics A. Refine ability to read cases to extract holding, and understand reasoning so can predict likely outcome under different facts. Much is general lawyer skills, though some is specific to constitutional law.1. Become familiar with recurring types of legal tests and forms of arguments. Brings order to the material; as one sees recurring patterns it doesn’t look so infinite 2. Learn to critique cases;...»

«GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER Adam J. Levitin Professor of Law Written Testimony of Adam J. Levitin Professor of Law Georgetown University Law Center Before the United States House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets and Government-Sponsored Enterprises “The Dodd-Frank Act’s Impact on Asset-Backed Securities” February 26, 2014 2:00 pm 2 Witness Background Statement Adam J. Levitin is a Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law...»

«Rehabilitation Report Old Cedar Avenue Bridge over Long Meadow Lake (Bridge No. 3145) FINAL The City of Bloomington, MN July 2014 SRF No. 8418 Rehabilitation Report Old Cedar Avenue Bridge over Long Meadow Lake (Bridge No. 3145) Prepared for City of Bloomington Certifications We hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 6/17/2014 Jamison Beisswenger, PE _...»

«Section 496: A New Era in Civil Liability for Misstatements? Elizabeth Joan Painter A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree of Bachelor of Laws (Honours) at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 10th October 2014 Acknowledgments First and foremost to my supervisor Associate Professor Shelley Griffiths for her guidance, encouragement and time. I am grateful to have had such a committed supervisor to keep me on track. To my family for all of the love and support they...»

«This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/13/2016 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2016-21326, and on FDsys.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R02-OAR-2016-0060; FRL-9945-84-Region 2] Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Puerto Rico; Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2008 Ozone, 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter and 2008 Lead NAAQS AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION:...»

«GUILTY PLEAS OR TRIALS: WHICH DOES THE BARRISTER PREFER? PETER W TAGUE* [Barristers in England and attorneys in the United States have been upbraided for pursuing their interests to their clients’ detriment in recommending guilty pleas over trials. While this accusation against American attorneys could be true since their incentives are sometimes skewed to favour guilty pleas, it is not accurate with respect to barristers in England. This is because the latter’s selfish incentives — to...»

«THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK LAW REVIEW, Vol. 18.1 (forthcoming, 2015) ELEVATING SUBSTANCE OVER PROCEDURE: THE RETROACTIVITY OF MILLER V. ALABAMA UNDER TEAGUE V. LANE. By Brandon Buskey 1 and Daniel Korobkin 2 ABSTRACT This Article proposes a unique framework establishing that the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. Alabama, which forbids states from automatically sentencing juveniles to life imprisonment without any meaningful opportunity for release, must apply...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.