WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:   || 2 |

«March 17, 2014 New York Court Affirms Separate Entity Ruling on Appeal On March 11, 2014, a New York state appellate court affirmed an important If ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

CLIENT PUBLICATION

LITIGATION

March 17, 2014

New York Court Affirms Separate Entity Ruling on Appeal

On March 11, 2014, a New York state appellate court affirmed an important

If you wish to receive more

information on the topics decision on the “separate entity” rule that is favorable to all multinational covered in this publication, banks that maintain a New York branch. New York’s separate entity rule you may contact your regular Shearman & Sterling contact protects banks from judgment creditors who seek to restrain or attach

person or any of the following:

assets located outside of New York by serving process on a bank’s New York Contacts branch. The continued viability of that rule has been called into question Heather Lamberg Kafele Washington, D.C.

since the 2009 Court of Appeals decision in Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda.

+1.202.508.8097 hkafele@shearman.com On October 22, 2012, in Ayyash v. Koleilat, 1 a New York court ruled in favor of Shearman & Sterling clients in reaffirming the continued viability Brian H. Polovoy New York of the separate entity rule and applying it to bar extraterritorial +1.212.848.4703 bpolovoy@shearman.com enforcement and discovery requests. The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed that decision this week on alternative grounds. 2 The Danforth Newcomb New York favorable decision in Ayyash adds to the tally of cases that have found that +1.212.848.4184 dnewcomb@shearman.com the separate entity rule survived Koehler. The increasing weight of Henry Weisburg authority that has reached this conclusion may influence the Court of New York Appeals when it has occasion to resolve the issue once and for all—which is +1.212.848.4193 hweisburg@shearman.com likely to happen sooner rather than later (likely early 2015) in light of the Keith R. Palfin Second Circuit’s recent certification of the issue in Tire Engineering v.

Washington, D.C.

Bank of China. This note provides an overview of the Ayyash decisions and +1.202.508.8179 keith.palfin@shearman.com applicable law.

–  –  –

you may also wish to refer to our Nov. 6, 2012 Shearman & Sterling Client Publication: New York Court Reaffirms Protections Afforded to Financial Institutions under the “Separate Entity” Rule.

Adnan Abu Ayyash v. Rana Abdul Rahim Koleilat, No. 151471/2012 (1st Dep’t Mar. 11, 2014).

SHEARMAN.COM 2 Background New York courts have long provided banks the protection of the “separate entity” rule, pursuant to which the individual branches of a bank are treated as separate legal entities for purposes of attachment and execution, distinct from their corporate headquarters and other branches. 3 This is an exception to the general rule that New York courts have jurisdiction over a bank as a whole if it maintains a branch in New York. As a result, judgment creditors seeking to enforce money judgments in New York have traditionally been unable to reach assets held in accounts outside of the United States simply by serving process on a bank’s New York branch. Instead, New York courts must have jurisdiction over the specific bank branch holding the sought-after assets before ordering the attachment or turnover of those assets.

As Shearman & Sterling noted in briefing the Ayyash matter, the separate entity rule has played an important role in facilitating the ability of banks to do business in New York for more than a century, “evolv[ing] into a key backbone of the modern system of global banking and international finance.” 4 Courts have long recognized that a contrary rule would “enormously increase the expense of conducting the banking business,” “be fraught with great risks to the bank,” and cause “endless difficulties, inconvenience, and confusion.” 5 Recent Controversy Regarding the Continuing Viability of the Separate Entity Rule In 2009, the New York Court of Appeals issued a decision in Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda, Ltd. 6 that led some attorneys and courts to question whether the separate entity rule is still good law. In Koehler, the Court of Appeals, in responding to a certified question from the Second Circuit, held that Art. 52 of New York’s Civil Practice Laws and Rules 7 has extraterritorial reach and thus does not prohibit the turnover of assets held outside of the United States where the court sitting in New York has personal jurisdiction over a garnishee bank. Importantly, Bank of Bermuda Ltd. had consented to the court’s personal jurisdiction in Koehler, and the separate entity rule was never mentioned, much less considered, in the majority opinion. 8 Nevertheless, judgment creditors have subsequently argued that the Court of Appeals in Koehler had impliedly eliminated (or greatly abrogated) the separate entity rule, such that service on a New York branch is sufficient to compel the provision of material related to, and the eventual turnover of, assets held in branches located anywhere in the world.

Cronan v. Schilling, 100 N.Y.S.2d 474, 476 (Sup. Ct. New York County 1950) (“Each branch of a bank is a separate entity, in no way concerned 3 with accounts maintained by depositors in other branches or at the home office.”), aff’d, 126 N.Y.S.2d 192 (1st Dep’t 1953).

Geoffrey Sant, The Rejection of the Separate Entity Rule Validates the Separate Entity Rule, 65 S.M.U.L. Rev. 813, 824 (2012).





4 Chrzanowska v. Corn Exch. Bank, 159 N.Y.S. 385, 388 (1st Dep’t 1916).

5 Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda Ltd., 12 N.Y.3d 533 (2009).

6 Article 52 of New York’s Civil Practice Laws and Rules (the “CPLR”) governs the enforcement of money judgments in NY state and federal 7 courts. Specifically, CPLR § 5225(b) authorizes New York courts to attach and turn over assets held on behalf of judgment debtors, while CPLR § 5224 governs discovery demands related to those assets.

Cf. Koehler, 12 N.Y.3d at 542 (Smith, J., dissenting) (noting that “[t]he majority’s holding opens a forum-shopping opportunity for any judgment 8 creditor trying to reach an asset of any judgment debtor held by a bank (or other garnishee) anywhere in the world,” and describing the majority opinion as a “recipe for trouble”).

–  –  –

This split in the case law was explicitly addressed by the March 2012 decision in Shaheen Sports, Inc. v. Asia Ins. Co., 11 in which the Southern District of New York, at the urging of Shearman & Sterling attorneys, held that the separate entity rule was still good law and prohibited a judgment creditor from executing on overseas assets through service on a bank’s New York branch.

A final resolution of this dispute over Koehler’s impact on the separate entity rule will require a ruling by New York’s Court of Appeals. That ruling is likely to be issued in the near future in light of the Second Circuit’s recent certification of just this issue to the Court of Appeals. 12 The Lower Court’s Ayyash Decision On October 22, 2012, Justice Ellen Coin of the Supreme Court, New York County, issued a decision addressing the separate entity rule in Ayyash v. Koleilat. The Ayyash case arose from a Lebanese money judgment obtained by a Lebanese judgment creditor against a Lebanese debtor. Adnan Abu Ayyash, the judgment creditor, sought to enforce this judgment in New York by serving the New York branches or subsidiaries of a number of banks with subpoenas demanding that they conduct a search for assets at their operations globally, freeze such assets and produce information and documents concerning such assets. After most of the banks responded to his demands solely on behalf of their New York entities, Ayyash brought an order to show cause seeking an order compelling the banks to respond to his requests with respect to assets, information and documents held at any branch, anywhere in the world.

The Ayyash decision, relying in significant part on the S.D.N.Y.’s decision in Shaheen, reaffirmed that the separate entity rule is still good law post-Koehler. The court quoted Shaheen’s conclusion that “[i]n light of the significant policy principles underlying the separate entity rule and its lengthy history in New York courts, [i]t is not unreasonable to expect that if the New York Court of Appeals had chosen to eliminate it, it would have said so.” 13 See, e.g., JW Oilfield Equip., LLC v. Commerzbank AG, No. 18 MS 0302, 2011 WL 507266 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 14, 2011); Eitzen Bulk v. Bank of 9 India, 827 F.Supp.2d 234 (S.D.N.Y. 2011).

See Global Technology, Inc. v. Royal Bank of Canada, 34 Misc. 3d 1209A (Sup. Ct. New York County 2012); Samsun Logix Corp. v. Bank of 10 China, 31 Misc. 3d 1226A (Sup. Ct. New York County 2011); Parbulk II AS v. Heritage Maritime, S.A., 35 Misc.3d 235 (Sup. Ct. New York County 2011). See also International Legal Consulting Ltd. v. Malabu Oil and Gas Ltd., 35 Misc.3d 1203(A) (Sup. Ct. New York County 2012) (applying the separate entity rule in prejudgment attachment proceedings).

Shaheen Sports, Inc. v. Asia Ins. Co., Ltd., 2012 WL 919664 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2012), app. dismissed, 2012 WL 4017287 (2d Cir. Aug. 14, 11 2012).

Tire Engineering and Distribution LLC v. Bank of China, Ltd., Nos. 13-1519-cv, 13-2535-cv(L), 13-2639-cv(con), 2014 WL 114285, at *1 (2d Cir.

12 Jan. 14, 2014). The New York Court of Appeals accepted certification. Docket No. CTQ-2014-00001.

Ayyash, No. 151471/2012 at 10 (citing Shaheen Sports, 2012 WL 919664 at *12).

13 3 More notably, however, the decision held that the separate entity rule not only prevents a judgment creditor from executing on assets located at a foreign branch, but also bars requests for information and documents outside of New York relating to those assets. This was a small but important expansion of the protection afforded by the separate entity rule. This ruling adopted the common sense view that such a distinction is untenable where the discovery sought relates to attachment efforts. As Justice Coin put it, where discovery is “but a first step in the proceeding, with the ultimate goal of subsequent attachment and turn-over[,]” it “would be an unproductive waste of judicial resources” for “the Court to start down this path, knowing that the ultimate goal is unavailable in this jurisdiction.” 14 Additionally, Justice Coin identified two alternative grounds for denying Ayyash’s requests. First, Justice Coin cited to principles of international comity in holding that the court would exercise its discretion to bar disclosure even absent the separate entity rule. Justice Coin noted that an order compelling discovery under such circumstances would frequently require bank branches located outside the United States to choose between complying with that order and violating the bank secrecy and data protection laws of the countries in which they operate. 15 Thus, in rejecting Ayyash’s attempt to use the New York courts “to launch a massive, multi-jurisdictional, international exercise in supplementary proceedings,” Justice Coin stated that the sought-after discovery is obtainable solely through the Hague Convention on Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Cases or under the applicable laws of the countries in which the assets are actually located. Second, Justice Coin invoked CPLR 5240, which gives courts broad discretion to reject post-judgment enforcement requests, as an alternative basis for denying Ayyash’s requests.

The First Department’s Ayyash Decision On March 11, 2014, following briefing by the parties and several amici, 16 New York’s Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed Justice Coin’s decision. As is not uncommon in this Court, the decision is very short (spanning little more than a page) and contains little analysis. The First Department found that the lower court had “providently exercised its discretion, pursuant to CPLR 5240, in denying the enforcement procedures sought by plaintiff since they would likely cause great annoyance and expense to respondents or their employees or agents.” It also found that, “[i]n addition, the denial of plaintiff’s motion is warranted based on principles of international comity since the underlying dispute did not originate in the United States, the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil and Commercial Matters provides an alternative recourse, and ordering compliance raises the risk of undermining important interests of other nations by potentially conflicting with their privacy laws or regulations.” The First Department did not address the separate entity rule dispute. As a result, the analysis of those issues in Justice Coin’s decision below remains good law.

–  –  –

Id. at 13 (citing cases).

15 The Institute of International Bankers, The Clearing House Association L.L.C., the European Banking Federation, and the New York Bankers 16 Association filed a brief as amici curiae with the First Department urging it to uphold Justice Coin’s decision.

4 Conclusion Justice Coin’s Ayyash decision reaffirmed the protection that the separate entity rule confers on global banks that maintain a New York branch. It is an important decision for global financial institutions in that it further added to the weight of authority rejecting the argument that Koehler eliminated the separate entity rule. This weight may influence the Court of Appeals when it has occasion to finally resolve the separate entity rule’s continued viability. The time for that resolution may be relatively soon: in January of this year, the Second Circuit referred this very question—i.e., whether the separate entity rule still applies to bar extraterritorial asset turnover and restraint requests post-Koehler—to the Court of Appeals in Tire Engineering and Distribution LLC v. Bank of China, Ltd. If the Court of Appeals affirms the separate entity rule’s viability, Justice Coin’s decision in Ayyash will remain important for its application of the separate entity rule to bar extraterritorial discovery in aid of attachment, which is an issue beyond the scope of the questions recently referred by the Second Circuit and which thus may not be resolved by New York’s highest court in the near term.



Pages:   || 2 |


Similar works:

«Escalié, Guillaume; Chaliès, Sébastien La négociation de significations professionnelles est-elle envisageable en formation? Propositions théoriques et illustrations Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Bildungswissenschaften 35 (2013) 2, S. 371-389 Empfohlene Zitierung/ Suggested Citation: Escalié, Guillaume; Chaliès, Sébastien: La négociation de significations professionnelles est-elle envisageable en formation? Propositions théoriques et illustrations In: Schweizerische Zeitschrift für...»

«FUNDED PROJECTS Details of the 41 third sector projects supported as part of Reshaping Care for Older GLASGOW THIRD People Glasgow City Partnership. Voluntary Action Fund SECTOR Administer this fund on behalf of the Glasgow Third Sector Interface TRANSFORMATION FUND Action on Hearing Loss Scotland (formerly RNID) Action on Hearing’s Hear to Help project enables people to make the most of their hearing aid and manage their hearing loss effectively and independently. It will provide support to...»

«Temporal characterization of harmonic radiation generated by intense laser–plasma interaction Yutaka Nomura ¨ Munchen 2008 Temporal characterization of harmonic radiation generated by intense laser–plasma interaction Yutaka Nomura Dissertation an der Fakult¨ t f¨ r Physik au der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universit¨ t a M¨ nchen u vorgelegt von Yutaka Nomura aus Chiba, Japan M¨ nchen, den 03 April 2008 u Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Ferenc Krausz Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Dietrich Habs Tag...»

«More than a MiniMuM The Resolution Foundation Review of the Future of the National Minimum Wage: the Final report Contents Chair’s Foreword 5 executive Summary 7 Summary of recommendations 12 SeCtion 1 – LeSSonS LearneD 15 16 Chapter 1 – Evidence on impacts 26 Chapter 2 – Evaluating today’s approach SeCtion 2 – BuiLDinG on SuCCeSS 34 35 Chapter 3 – A broader approach to low pay 40 Chapter 4 – A more far-sighted minimum wage 48 Chapter 5 – A more assertive approach with new...»

«Dissertation Title The poetry of Adonis in translation: an analysis Author Salha, Moutassem URL http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/2972/ Date 2011 Citation Salha, Moutassem (2011) The poetry of Adonis in translation: an analysis. [Dissertation] This document is made available to authorised users, that is current staff and students of the University of Central Lancashire only, to support teaching and learning at that institution under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ licence. It may be...»

«éduSCOL Ressources pour le lycée général et technologique Ressources pour le cycle terminal Langues vivantes étrangères Exemples de sujets d'études Anglais Ces documents peuvent être utilisés et modifiés librement dans le cadre des activités d'enseignement scolaire, hors exploitation commerciale. Toute reproduction totale ou partielle à d’autres fins est soumise à une autorisation préalable du Directeur général de l’enseignement scolaire. La violation de ces dispositions est...»

«Joint Center for Housing Studies Harvard University The Origins of American Housing Reform Alexander von Hoffman W98-2 August 1998 Alexander von Hoffman is a Senior Research Fellow at the Joint Center for Housing Studies.  by Alexander von Hoffman. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including  notice, is given to the source. Any opinions expressed are those of the author and not...»

«371 НОВИНИ ЗАРУБІЖНОЇ НАУКИ Abdul Haque1, Jui Cheng Hung2, Hung Chun Liu3 PAKISTANI STOCK MARKET AND RATIONAL SPECULATIVE BUBBLES4 Recent years have witnessed a tremendous boom at the Pakistani equity market followed by a sudden meltdown. By employing the univariate time series analysis and duration dependence test (DDT) (McQueen and Thorley, 1994) over the weekly return data of KSE 100 index for the peri od from 1999 to 2008 this study investigates whether this boom was...»

«1 I is.22(1 )(a)(ii)l From: Sent: Tuesda;{ 2 June 2015 1:59 PM ls.22(1) a)(ii)ll To: FW: 150601 Austnilias International Energy Agency (lEA) Oil Stockholdings ( Subject: [SEC= UNCLASSIFIED] High Importance: From: Berne, Brendan Sent: Tuesday, 2 June 2015 1:57 PM To: Adams, Jan; Ls.2_2,(1):.;,(a:';:')(i,i).,.,,.LJ=-, Cc: Bryant, Rebecca; s.22(1)(a)(ii) Subject: 150601 Australias International Energy Agency (lEA) Oil Stockholdings ( [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Importance: High Jan,ls.22(1 )(a)(ii)l Please...»

«$100 23RD FILM FEST FEBRUARY 26 28, 2015 February 26-28, 2015 7:00PM NIGHTLY ENGINEERED AIR THEATRE ARTS COMMONS | 205 8 AVE SE VISITING ARTIST TALK Thursday Feb 26, 2:00pm | ACAD | Stanford Perrot Lecture Theatre WORKSHOP Saturday Feb 28, 10:00am | ACAD | Room 439 | $80 Registration: production@csif.org | 403 205 4747 OFFSITE WORKS At Arts Commons video monitors and UAS +15 window (2015 8 Ave SE) and EMMEDIA (351 11 Ave SW) AFTER PARTY Saturday, Feb 28, 9:00pm | Wine Oh’s | 811 1 St SW...»

«Quantitative textural analysis of Vulcanian pyroclasts (Montserrat) using multi-scale X-ray computed microtomography: comparison with results from 2D image analysis Thomas Giachetti, Alain Burgisser, Laurent Arbaret, Timothy H. Druitt, Karim Kelfoun To cite this version: Thomas Giachetti, Alain Burgisser, Laurent Arbaret, Timothy H. Druitt, Karim Kelfoun. Quantitative textural analysis of Vulcanian pyroclasts (Montserrat) using multi-scale X-ray computed microtomography: comparison with results...»

«FINANCIAL FLAGSHIP INCREASING ACCESS TO CREDIT THROUGH REFORMING SECURED TRANSACTIONS IN THE MENA REGION ALEJANDRO ALVAREZ DE LA CAMPA * JUNE 2010 The World Bank * Alejandro Alvarez de la Campa, Global Product Leader for IFC’s Secured Transactions and Collateral Registries Program, World Bank Group. The author wishes to gratefully acknowledge the inputs provided by Murat Sultanov and Angana Shah and the assistance and guidance of Roberto Rocha in the preparation of this paper. The author is...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.