WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 14 | 15 || 17 | 18 |   ...   | 32 |

«This research has been partially sponsored by the Dutch Joint Academic and Commer- cial Quality Research & Development (Jacquard) program on Software ...»

-- [ Page 16 ] --

We grouped the products into global and non-global products, depending on whether the product has been developed using GSD or not. Furthermore, we applied a further characterization of the architectural knowledge evaluation criteria from Table 5.2 using the key elements of architectural knowledge. We identified four clusters of architectural knowledge evaluation criteria: documentation, architectural knowledge (including the key elements Ass, Alt, Dec, Dep, and Rat), solution fragment (including the key elements Des, Dom, Pat, and Env), and performance (including the key element Map).

Elements labelled “n/a” in Table 5.4 indicate that the selected evaluation criterion was not inside the scope of that specific software product assessment (e.g., it was deemed

–  –  –

not applicable for some reason).

We make the following observations on the application and description of the architectural knowledge evaluation criteria in the software product assessments under study.

We list our observations per cluster of architectural knowledge evaluation criteria:

Documentation – Crit. 7 – Documenting application architecture and design is applied in three software products that have been developed using GSD. Furthermore, in two of these products, its application has been described as well. Yet, we observe that Crit 1. – Appropriate views and viewpoints has either not been applied in the architectural descriptions of the products to address the needs of the stakeholders involved (IEEE, 2000) (Product H), or has not been included in the assessment scope (products A, B, and D).

We observe that Product G explicitly incorporates views and viewpoints whereas Product E has used views and viewpoints without a sufficient description or explanation of its application. Furthermore, the architecture description of Product G elaborates on each view in additional reference documents.

Rationale – The two evaluation criteria (Crit. 6 – Design rationale and Crit. 12 – Rationale) that fall in this category are not always applied in the software products under study; when they are applied (at products A, D, C, F, and G), its application has not been described. E.g. in the evaluation report of Product A, developed in a large

GSD project, the auditors of this assessment conclude that:

“(... ) the description of the rationale and assumptions in the architecture description is very minimal.”

795. Product Practices for AKM in GSD

Solution Fragment – Crit. 4 – Decomposition and layering and the use of Crit. 5 – Design patterns and architectural patterns in general are well-known approaches (measures) to reduce complexity in a software product. The application of these measures, however, is rather scarce, both in products developed using a single development site and using GSD. Apart from that, the only explicit occurrence of a measure in this category is with Crit. 8 – Explicit external dependencies at Product B. Further examination of the assessment of Product B showed no specific circumstances in which this measure is applied. It is applied and described in a functional design and in the installation manual of the product. In Product A, on the other hand, the criterion is not applied, causing the product to be assessed as ‘overly complex’.

Performance – Various architectural knowledge evaluation criteria have to do with a specific quality criterion, i.e., performance (termed ‘time behavior’ in (ISO/IEC, 2001)).

We observe that in most cases, these architectural knowledge evaluation criteria either have not been applied (at most products developed using GSD) or have been left outside the scope of the assessment (at most products developed using a single development site).

5.5 Discussion of the Results In this research, we showed what key elements constitute architectural knowledge. Using these key elements and a series of software product assessments, we determined which key elements of architectural knowledge are made explicit in the software product (so-called architectural knowledge evaluation criteria). We focused on differences between products that were developed using global software development and those that were developed using a single development site. As such, this research sheds light on what architectural knowledge measures are applied in GSD to improve the quality of software products.

If a similar approach was used during development of the software product instead of only when development has been completed, feedback could be given to the software development organizations in a timely fashion. This would allow for adequate measures to be taken to increase the quality of the software product during the development phase.

In contrasting software products developed using GSD with products developed on a single development site, we did not find significant differences between the two groups.

We do observe some overall results on the application of architectural knowledge in products developed using GSD.

Software products developed using GSD, as those developed using a single development site, typically have an architectural description. This confirms an increased atten˚ tion towards documentation in GSD, as expressed in (Agerfalk and Fitzgerald, 2006), although we have not found evidence for an overly focus on documentation in these products. On the other hand, the architectural descriptions generally do not seem to be organized using views and viewpoints to address specific stakeholder concerns (Clements et al., 2003). Apparently, the benefits of a view-based architectural description as described by e.g., (Sangwan et al., 2006) are not yet widely acknowledged.





80 5.5. Discussion of the Results

Benefits of capturing architectural knowledge that enable architecting as a decisionmaking process (i.e., assumptions, alternatives, and rationale) are not yet widely accepted in GSD. This is in line with an earlier study we conducted (see Chapter 2, but still shows that the perceived benefits need to be communicated further, especially in GSD environments.

Architectural knowledge that focuses on solution fragments is not regularly made explicit in software products or their documentation. This poses a question on how knowledge on these topics is shared in the GSD projects. These findings appear to contradict the focus on overly (solution-based) documentation generally propagated by GSD literature.

Performance is an important quality attribute which, according to the auditors, and acknowledged by (Bachmann and Bass, 2001), requires to be addressed by architectural knowledge. It is striking that in hardly any software product information on bottlenecks, scalability, load balancing, or single-points-of-failure can be found. Furthermore, we learned that this cluster of architectural knowledge seems to be not applicable in projects running on a single site; surely, performance-dependent systems are not confined to being developed using GSD.

Several architectural knowledge evaluation criteria were left outside of the scope of the software product assessments we studied. Yet, the criteria used in this study are universal criteria for high-quality software products. Consequently, the understanding of the importance of these evaluation criteria and their benefits still can be improved by explicitly incorporating these criteria in an evaluation framework.

5.5.1 Limitations Our study was performed on a subset of software product assessments on business administration systems performed by an IT consultancy firm in The Netherlands. We use this study to gain insight into measures taken in software products to make explicit architectural knowledge. As such, this study does not aim to give a broad overview of the status quo of software product quality, but aims at sparking a discussion on the use of product-based measures related to architectural knowledge to increase software product quality in general and, more specifically, in GSD.

81 6 Identifying Practices for Architectural Knowledge Management in Global Software Development In the previous two chapters, we have described studies that were focused on identifying how architectural knowledge management occurs in global software development.

The results showed that process practices can provide solutions to issues involved in GSD. Furthermore, we found that product practices for architectural knowledge management do not appear to contribute substantially to the quality of products developed using GSD. In this chapter, we take a different perspective. We identify whether architectural knowledge management can leverage the solutions that are available from the requirements engineering discipline to address the challenges in GSD.

6.1 Introduction In the past few years, an increasing interest in architectural knowledge management can be recognized in the software architecture community (Jansen and Bosch, 2005;

Kruchten et al., 2006; Babar et al., 2007; van der Ven et al., 2006b). Generally, architectural knowledge is regarded as important to guide the development and evolution of software systems (Kruchten et al., 2006).

With the trend of global software development, architectural knowledge management becomes even more important due to challenges that arise as a result of the geographical, temporal, and socio-cultural distance innate to GSD (Holmstr¨ m et al., o 2006). Overviews of the challenges in GSD have been widely reported in (Battin et al., ˚ 2001; Agerfalk et al., 2005; Holmstr¨ m et al., 2006; Clerc et al., 2007a,b) and include o lack of informal contact, language differences, and coordination complexity, see e.g., ˚ (Agerfalk et al., 2005).

Solutions to overcome GSD challenges generally deal with the way individuals interact with each other in a distributed setting. These solutions are provided in terms of communication and coordination strategies (Herbsleb and Grinter, 1999a; Herbsleb, 2007; Lanubile et al., 2003). In these strategies, recording decisions about the architec

<

836. Identifying Practices for AKM in GSD

ture plays a pivotal role (Clerc et al., 2007a; Herbsleb and Grinter, 1999a). However, we are currently lacking detailed insight into architectural knowledge management practices that can effectively be applied in a GSD setting, following observations from the literature on challenges in knowledge sharing in a GSD situation (Desouza et al., 2006;

Balaji and Ahuja, 2005).

To address this lack of insight, we build on the discipline of requirements engineering. The requirements engineering discipline is a well-discussed example of a discipline that becomes challenging in GSD, see e.g., (Hsieh, 2006; Damian, 2007). We observe a close resemblance between a set of requirements for a software system and a set of architectural decisions taken for that software system: what one person regards as requirements for a software system, another person may regard as architectural decisions (van Vliet, 2008; de Boer and van Vliet, 2009). Furthermore, we conjecture that the same challenges that the requirements engineering discipline faces with GSD hold for architectural knowledge management practices in GSD as well: as with requirements, architectural decisions too need to be communicated across different sites in order to maintain a shared vision of the software system that is designed.

We have constructed a set of architectural knowledge management practices based on a study of relevant literature on the requirements engineering discipline related to GSD. We describe these practices using a light-weight pattern language. The elements of this pattern language and its application on describing architectural knowledge management practices may help organizations in making a well-supported choice between architectural knowledge managements practices for application in GSD projects.

We provide an initial validation of the usefulness and effectiveness of these practices through semi-structured interviews on these practices within a large IT service provider.

This chapter is structured as follows. In §6.2 we list the approach we applied for this research. Next, in §6.3 we povide an overview of the resulting architectural knowledge management practices in GSD. We then provide an initial validation in §6.4 and list our conclusions in §6.5.

6.2 Research Approach In this section, we describe our approach to select relevant literature for this research in §6.2.1 and describe a light-weight pattern language for the description of the architectural knowledge management practices in §6.2.2.

6.2.1 Literature research We built a representative subset of relevant literature on the topic of requirements engineering in relation to global software development. First, we identified important software engineering conferences on this subject, such as the ICSE GSD workshops, the ICGSE ’06 and ’07 conferences, and the RE conferences. Subsequently, we collected the proceedings of these conferences. In addition, we selected special issues from relevant journals (Communications of the ACM, IEEE Software).

84 6.2. Research Approach

In our search to collect GSD requirements engineering practices that can help in overcoming GSD challenges, we scanned the abstract, introduction, and conclusion of all contributions. Contributions which explicitly reported on validated practices were studied in full detail.

After having collected the GSD requirements engineering practices, we translated these practices, if needed, to the discipline of architectural knowledge management.

When the requirements engineering practices mentioned “requirements”, we translated this into “architectural decisions”; when the practices mentioned the “requirements engineering discipline”, we translated this into the “architecting phase” or “architecture development phase”, following the similarities discussed in §6.1. In this way, we ensure that we stay fully in line with the practices as they were initially reported in the requirements engineering literature; we list the references to the requirements engineering literature throughout the description of the practices.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 14 | 15 || 17 | 18 |   ...   | 32 |


Similar works:

«LA MUJER EN LA LOTA DE HOY. DE LA ESTRUCTURA PATRIARCAL A LA FEMINIZACIÓN DE LA CIUDAD1. Patricio Medina Hernández2 y Alejandro Varas Alvarado3 avance de investigación en curso. GT06 Imaginarios sociales, memorias y poscolonialidad.RESUMEN Esta investigación se propone describir, analizar e interpretar las transformaciones identitarias de los habitantes de Lota, desde los estudios de género, considerando aquellas transformaciones vinculadas a los cambios socioeconómicos de las últimas...»

«Neoplasms of the Nose and Paransal Sinuses May 2004 TITLE: Neoplasms of the Nose and Paranasal Sinuses SOURCE: Grand Rounds Presentation, UTMB, Dept. of Otolaryngology DATE: May 19, 2004 RESIDENT PHYSICIAN: Steven T. Wright, MD FACULTY ADVISOR: Anna Pou, MD SERIES EDITORS: Francis B. Quinn, Jr., MD and Matthew W. Ryan, MD ARCHIVIST: Melinda Stoner Quinn, MSICS This material was prepared by resident physicians in partial fulfillment of educational requirements established for the Postgraduate...»

«The Impact of Financial Structure on the Cost of Solar Energy Michael Mendelsohn, Claire Kreycik, Lori Bird, Paul Schwabe, and Karlynn Cory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-53086 March 2012 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 The Impact of Financial Structure on the Cost of Solar Energy Michael Mendelsohn, Claire Kreycik, Lori Bird, Paul...»

«DOUBT Among Us Trilogy Book 1 Anne-Rae Vasquez AR Publishing Doubt – Among Us Trilogy This is a work of fiction. The events and characters described here are purely fictional and in no way represent or resemble real life events, places or people. Among Us Trilogy. Copyright © 2012 by AR Publishing www.amongus.ca www.anne-raevasquez.com Developmental Editor: Josefina Rosado Editor: Candace Sinclair, WordsRU Copy Editor: B. Miller Cover graphic design by AR Publishing Illustration of Mist by...»

«ANNEXE 1 Concours Europan 9 – Site « Le Locle : Col-des-Roches » Projet lauréat « Empreintes » 1.1 Texte du jury ANNEXE 1 Concours Europan 9 – Site « Le Locle : Col-des-Roches » Projet lauréat « Empreintes » 1.2 Variations typologiques ANNEXE 1 Concours Europan 9 – Site « Le Locle : Col-des-Roches » Projet lauréat « Empreintes » 1.3 Orientations stratégie ANNEXE 1 Concours Europan 9 – Site « Le Locle : Col-des-Roches » Projet lauréat « Empreintes » 1.4 Plan de...»

«BAKI BEYNƏLXALQ HUMANİTAR FORUMUNUN MATERİALLARI 2–3 oktyabr 2014-cü il MATERIALS OF THE BAKU INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN FORUM 2–3 October 2014 МАТЕРИАЛЫ БАКИНСКОГО МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО ГУМАНИТАРНОГО ФОРУМА 2–3 октября 2014 года ISBN 978-9952-489-00-4 ISBN 978-9952-498-01-1 Bakı Beynəlxalq Humanitar Forumunun materialları (2–3 oktyabr 2014-cü il). – Bakı: “Şərq-Qərb”, 2016. 2 cilddə, II cild. – 412 səh....»

«Causality marking across levels of language structure A cognitive semantic analysis of causal verbs and causal connectives in Dutch Published by LOT phone: +31 30 253 6006 Trans 10 fax: +31 30 253 6000 3512 JK Utrecht e-mail: lot@let.uu.nl The Netherlands http://wwwlot.let.uu.nl/ Cover illustration: Language reflects our subjective interpretation of reality (Hermann’s grid, L. Hermann (1870)). ISBN 90-76864-84-5 NUR 632 Copyright © 2005: Ninke Stukker. All rights reserved. Causality marking...»

«Understanding Bach, 10, 71–83 © Bach Network UK 2015 Remaining Silhouettes of Lost Bach Manuscripts? Re-evaluating J. P. Kellner’s Copy of J. S. Bach’s Solo String Compositions* ZOLTÁN SZABÓ Johann Peter Kellner (1705–1772) has long been recognised as one of the most prolific copyists of J. S. Bach’s works. Most of his copies were of organ and clavier compositions by J. S. Bach, although there are some notable non-keyboard works among them. The best known of these are the two sets...»

«Thank You Messages Received Via the Halifax International Airport Web Site Wednesday September 12, 2001 Thank you very much for the information good luck coping with the nightmare over there Best regards, Marek Wednesday, September 12, 2001 Thanks for the great site. it has been a great help so far during this crisis. my relatives have been stranded/diverted there ( i think ). thanks to all great people who helped out ! Sincerely, Mickey Wednesday, September 12, 2001 Just wanted to take a...»

«Empirical Evidence for Niss’ Implemented Anticipation in Mathematising Realistic Situations Gloria Stillman Jill P. Brown Australian Catholic University (Ballarat) Australian Catholic University (Melbourne) gloria.stillman@acu.edu.au jill.brown@acu.edu.au Mathematisation of realistic situations is an on-going focus of research. Classroom data from a Year 9 class participating in a program of structured modelling of real situations was analysed for evidence of Niss’s theoretical construct,...»

«AUTO/MOTORCYCLES MODIFIED SILENCERS (No. B/634) Mr A. Ameer Meea (First Member for Port Louis Maritime & Port Louis East) asked the Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Home Affairs and External Communications, Minister for Rodrigues whether, in regard to the auto-cycles and motorcycles, he will, for the benefit of the House, obtain from the Commissioner of Police, information as to the number thereof which have been checked, in the Metropolitan (North) Division, over the past two years,...»

«Learning from Their Own Learning: How Metacognitive and Meta-affective Reflections Enhance Learning in Race-Related Courses Nancy Chick University of Wisconsin-Barron County Rice Lake, Wisconsin, USA nancy.chick@uwc.edu Terri Karis University of Wisconsin-Stout Menomonie, Wisconsin, USA KarisT@uwstout.edu Cyndi Kernahan University of Wisconsin-River Falls River Falls, Wisconsin, USA cynthia.kernahan@uwrf.edu Abstract This interdisciplinary project examined how students think and feel about...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.