FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 18 | 19 || 21 | 22 |   ...   | 43 |

«      Boffo, Marco (2013) Interrogating the knowledge‐based economy: from  ...»

-- [ Page 20 ] --

Thus, for Hardt and Negri, it is “multitudinous” social movements that ‘determine new forms of life and cooperation’, creating ‘that wealth that parasitic postmodern capitalism would otherwise not know how to suck out of the blood of the proletariat’, since they posit production as increasingly taking ‘place in movement and cooperation, in exodus and community’ (Hardt, Negri, 2000, p.397, emphasis added). Therefore, ‘rather than an organ functioning within the capitalist body, biopolitical labor power’ is seen by Hardt and Negri as ‘becoming more and more autonomous, with capital simply hovering over it parasitically with its disciplinary regimes, apparatuses of capture, mechanisms of expropriation, financial networks, and the like’. Hence, for Hardt and Negri, the ‘rupture of the organic relationship’ between capital and productive social life as understood by Marx ‘and the growing autonomy of labor are at the heart of the new forms of crisis of capitalist production and control’ (Hardt, Negri, 2009, p.142, emphasis added). By now, readers familiar with autonomist Marxism and the history of Italian operaismo will have recognised Negri’s lineage (see Negri, 1991 [1979]), for which departure, or, more figuratively, suspension, from its origins in Marxian political economy is strikingly apparent.

2.3) Cognitive capitalism80 As Camfield notes, ‘in the shadow of Hardt and Negri’s hegemonic figures of labour lurks [the] potentially more credible notion... of globally-dominant forms of capitalist accumulation’, a notion that Hardt and Negri themselves fall short of proposing. Indeed, although bearing Other than by post-workerist autonomist Marxists, the concept of cognitive capitalism is also used systematically by Enzo Rullani (2000, 2004) and André Gorz (2003). Several points of contact exist between their work and post-workerist autonomist Marxism. Indeed, while Rullani straddles economic theory and (critical) management and business studies (with specific emphasis on the EK, industrial districts and post-Fordism), Gorz’s own trajectory closely resembles the (declining) trajectory of Italian post-workerist Marxism (an account of which will be provided in the following sections). Hailing from the Marxist analysis of the labour process (Gorz, 1973), Gorz gradually shifted to arguing the loss of relevance of the industrial working class in light of the changes of work and the labour process in the last decades of the twentieth century (1980), and arguing against work itself and a work ethic posited as deriving from an existentially and culturally limited economic rationality (1988). Finally, in dialogue with, and drawing from, post-workerist writing, Gorz has recently come to reject the persistent validity of value theory in light of the putative rise of knowledge as the central factor of production and, therefore, of cognitive capitalism itself (2003). Although this chapter refrains from providing a full assessment and account of the intellectual trajectories of Rullani and Gorz, reference to Gorz’s work will be made as part of the debate on cognitive capitalism. For a collection of (appreciative) accounts of Gorz’s work and trajectory, see Fourel, 2012; for a critique of Gorz’s rejection of value theory in Gorz, 2003, see

Hermann, 2009; and, for assessments of Gorz’s contribution to the debate on cognitive capitalism, see:

Pouch, 2004; Harribey, 2004; Gollain, 2010; Vercellone, 2009, 2012; Gorz, 2004. An assessment of Rullani’s (2000, 2004) views on the KBE can be found in Bologna, 2007.

implications for contemporary capitalism, and based on a classification of ‘the succession of economic paradigms since the Middle Ages in three distinct moments, each defined by the dominant sector of the economy’ (Hardt, Negri, 2000, p.280), Hardt and Negri’s theory of immaterial labour does not, by itself, stand up to the challenge of elevating ‘to the global scale concepts which regulation-school and social-structure-of-accumulation-style political economy have usually applied at the level of nation-states’ (Camfield, 2007, p.38, note 89), leaving the socio-economic foundations of their political theoretic edifice incomplete as a theory of contemporary capitalism. Nonetheless, as this section will show, the debate on cognitive capitalism, in close connection with Hardt and Negri’s theory of immaterial labour, has sought to respond precisely to this challenge along similar lines as those perceptively anticipated by Camfield.

2.3.1) Completing the paradigm Taking stock from the crisis of the 1970s, the (presumed) primacy of knowledge in the accumulation process, and earlier debates on the current nature and configuration of capitalism itself, the concept of cognitive capitalism has been recently proposed as a description of the new mode of regulation characterising contemporary capitalism (Corsani et al., 2001, p.3). Indebted to Hardt and Negri’s (2000) Empire (see, for instance, Moulier Boutang, 2008, pp.33-34, for a passionate defence of the latter’s daring theoretical nature) and developed by drawing from, and in parallel with, the immaterial labour debate itself, the debate on cognitive capitalism addresses the lacking element identified by Camfield (2007) as discussed above. Further, by providing an economic perspective on the same phenomena tackled by Hardt and Negri’s trilogy and their structural implications for capitalism,81 the debate on cognitive capitalism supports and reinforces the socio-economic foundation of Hardt and Negri’s political thought (and version of post-workerism) by complementing their theory of immaterial labour and completing the trajectory of post-operaismo’s reading of contemporary capitalism. Flourishing in the noughties around the journal Multitudes and part of the work of the research unit Matisse at the University of the Sorbonne (for which, see http://matisse.univ-paris1.fr/capitalisme, last accessed on the 9th of August 2013), the debate on cognitive capitalism and its research programme have found consolidation in the publication of two collective volumes (Vercellone, 2003 and its updated and revised Italian translation as Vercellone, 2006a) and one authored book (Moulier Boutang, 2008).82 A See Negri, 2003 for recognition of how some core contributions to Vercellone, 2003 and the cognitive capitalism debate express a kindred perspective to his own reading of contemporary capitalism. But see also footnote 83.

The expression is also starting to gain momentum across radical scholarship as a buzzword in its own right, as shown, for example, by the collection published in Peters, Bulut, 2011, and two recent issues of distinguishing feature of the debate on cognitive capitalism is the extent to which it differs from the one on immaterial labour in breadth and scope. Indeed, the latter is defined by very low heterogeneity in terms of adherence to the paradigm, and strong polarisation around acceptance of the concept (with those accepting it deploying post-workerist concepts and method, and gaining prominence in the noughties across leftist and radical scholarship and activism). On the other hand, the debate on cognitive capitalism has been characterised by: a) greater pluralism of contributions, ranging from explicitly post-workerist positions (for example: Hardt, Negri, 2000, 2004, 2009; Moulier Boutang, 2008; Marazzi, 1998, 1999, 2008) to those critical of the way the debate has developed (as, for example, Chesnais, 2006 and Caffentzis, 2011), through those attempting to recast the debate in Marxist terms (Vercellone, 2007a); b) a more heterogeneous and eclectic theoretical framework, drawing from Italian operaismo, but also (and more or less selectively across) Marxian political economy, Veblenian institutionalism, classical political economy, Schumpeterian and Kondratiev inspired approaches, the Braudelian theory of the longue durée, world-systems analysis, French Regulation theory, etc. (see, for examples, the contributions to Vercellone, 2003 and 2006a);

and c) a varying degree of adherence to the concept and a consequent greater disposition to debate, signified in the tentativeness of titles such as Sommes-nous sortis du capitalisme industriel? (Vercellone, 2003) and ‘The Hypothesis of Cognitive Capitalism’ (Vercellone, 2005).

Nonetheless, despite the pluralism characterising the debate and the attempts to recast it in Marxist terms, and given the debate’s focus on defining a new regime of accumulation where ‘knowledge tends to be subjected to direct valorisation’ and ‘production transcends the traditional locus of the firm’ (Corsani et al., 2001, p.9), the core theoretical proposition of cognitive capitalism lies undoubtedly at the encounter of Italian post-operaismo and the French Regulation School (Fumagalli, Lucarelli, 2007). It is with this core (of which Corsani et al., 2001, Vercellone, 2007a and Moulier Boutang, 2008 are representative) that issue will be taken.83 the European Journal of Economic and Social Systems (Fumagalli, Vercellone, 2007 and Lebert, Vercellone, 2011) which gather contributions from authors characteristically associated with the core scholarship of the cognitive capitalism debate as well as more eclectic takes on the topic.

In addition to the above, there is good reason to doubt the effectiveness and practical relevance of the pluralism characterising the cognitive capitalism debate with respect to the adherence of its participants to the post-workerist reading of contemporary capitalism. In this respect, Negri’s (2003) review of Vercellone, 2003, together with its response to those contributions within the latter directing internal and external critiques to the cognitive capitalism perspective, provides a strikingly eloquent example of the limits of, if not intra-paradigmatic tolerance for, such pluralism. Indeed, Negri identifies the contributions of Vercellone and Herrera, Dockès, Dieuaide, Vercellone, and Moulier Boutang as ‘pars constituens’ of the book because of their development of ‘the thematic of the General Intellect’ and their description of ‘a scenario of the post-Fordist economy which realises fully the real subsumption of society to capital’, while ‘identifying at the same time the contradictions’ entailed by this process. Thus, for Negri, these contributions represent ‘a theoretical basis’ for the definition of the ‘new’ condition of 2.3.2) In search of a third historical capitalism beyond the Knowledge-Based Economy and post-Fordism Taking the ‘critique of the political economy of the new liberal theories of the knowledgebased economy’ as point of departure, and positing the irreducibility of ‘the current mutation of capitalism... to the mere constitution of an economy founded on knowledge’, the very aim, within the cognitive capitalism debate, to understand the current configuration of capitalism as a ‘knowledge-based economy framed and subsumed by the laws of capital accumulation’ (Vercellone, 2007a, p.14; similarly, Toscano, 2007, pp.5-6) is implicit in the designation of the research programme itself. Thus, while the appeal to capitalism is meant to refer to ‘the enduring element in the change of the structural invariants of the capitalist mode of production... the driving role of profit and the wage relation or, more precisely, the different forms of dependent labour on which the extraction of surplus labour is founded’, ‘the term “cognitive”’ is meant to emphasise the putative ‘new nature of the conflictual relation of capital and labour, and of the forms of property on which’ capital accumulation putatively rests (Vercellone, 2007a, p.14, note 1; similarly, Lebert, Vercellone, 2006). Nonetheless, the extent to which the debate distances itself from the mainstream, in general and with specific reference to mainstream economics, is questionable, as evident from the attitudes of some of the main proponents of cognitive capitalism (both as a concept and a debate on the contemporary nature of capitalism). For instance, Vercellone (2007a) and Moulier Boutang (2008) differ significantly in this respect (although they share the same historical account of the development of capitalism and characterisation of its current stage, see below). Indeed, Vercellone is critical of the ‘neoclassical theories of endogenous growth and [the] knowledgebased economy’, for he considers their account of ‘the diffusion and... evermore central role of knowledge’ flawed for its abstracting from ‘capital/labour antagonism’ and the ‘conflicts of knowledge and power’ structuring what he sees as the contemporary ‘transformations in the division of labour’ (Vercellone, 2007a, pp.13-14; for more of Vercellone’s views on EGT, see Herrera, Vercellone, 2000); thus, Vercellone is explicitly concerned with recasting the debate in Marxist terms (Vercellone, 2007a; Toscano, 2007). On the other hand, Moulier Boutang (2008)

builds (even if only rhetorically) on authors and concepts from the mainstream (for example:

‘cognitive work and the new anthropological composition of productive subjectivities’ (Negri, 2003, p.201). On the other hand, Negri dismisses the internal critiques of Schmeder and Corsani as unable to grasp the ‘most characteristic feature of the point of view defended by Vercellone’ and company, i.e.

that the ‘development’ and ‘mutation of the economic horizon result from class struggle’ (Negri, 2003, p.202). Similarly, Negri dismisses (unappreciatively and hastily) the external critiques of Chesnais and Serfati for their ‘stubbornness’ in holding undiminished capital’s grip on the production of knowledge and division of labour, which both Chesnais and Serfati consider as still subject to the strict logic of Taylorism. Polemically, Negri posits such ‘stubbornness’ as only paralleled by what he perceives to be Chenais’s and Serfati’s ‘incapacity to understand the most evident mutations of the contemporary productive horizon’ (Negri, 2003, p.203).

Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 18 | 19 || 21 | 22 |   ...   | 43 |

Similar works:

«WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 26, 2016 To the Shareholders of Wintrust Financial Corporation: You are cordially invited to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Wintrust Financial Corporation to be held at our offices located at 9700 West Higgins Road, 2nd Floor, Rosemont, Illinois 60018, on Thursday, May 26, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. Central Time, for the following purposes: 1. To elect the 12 nominees for director named in this...»

«DISSERTATIONES TECHNOLOGIAEUNIVERSITATIS TARTUENSIS KALLE PÄRN Studies on inducible alphavirus-based antitumour strategy mediated by site-specific delivery with activatable cell-penetrating peptides DISSERTATIONES TECHNOLOGIAE UNIVERSATIS TARTUENSIS DISSERTATIONES TECHNOLOGIAE UNIVERSATIS TARTUENSIS KALLE PÄRN Studies on inducible alphavirus-based antitumour strategy mediated by site-specific delivery with activatable cell-penetrating peptides Institute of Technology, Faculty of Science and...»

 Is there a supernatural dimension, a world beyond the one we know? Is there life after death? Do angels exist? Can our dreams contain messages from Heaven? Can we tap into ancient secrets of the supernatural? Are healing miracles real? Sid Roth has spent over 35 years researching the strange world of the supernatural. Join Sid for this edition of It’s Supernatural. SID: Hello. Welcome to my world where it's naturally, it is naturally supernatural. I'm kind of upset over something. I...»

«Endeca MDEX Engine Basic Development Guide Version 6.2.2 • March 2012 Contents Preface About this guide Who should use this guide Conventions used in this guide Contacting Oracle Endeca Customer Support Part I: Presentation API Basics Chapter 1: Endeca Presentation API Overview List of Endeca APIs Architecture of the Presentation API One query, one page About query result objects returned by the MDEX Engine Chapter 2: Working with the Endeca Presentation API Core classes of the Presentation...»

«New Metrics for Meaningful Evaluation of Informally Structured Speech Retrieval Maria Eskevich1, Walid Magdy2, and Gareth J.F. Jones1,2 1 Centre for Digital Video Processing, School of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland 2 Centre for Next Generation Localisation, School of Computing, Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland {meskevich,wmagdy,gjones}@computing.dcu.ie Abstract. Search effectiveness for tasks where the retrieval units are clearly defined documents is...»

«State of New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services 29 Hazen Drive POB 95 Concord NH 03302-0095 (603)271-3445 (603)271-2997 (fax) WATER TESTING GUIDE We are providing this packet of information to help you choose the appropriate water test for your home and to assist you in taking a proper water sample. The document SUGGESTED WATER QUALITY TESTING FOR HOMEOWNER WELLS provides a general description and educational information to help you consider which test would be most useful. This...»

«Conflict, Change and Conflict Resolution Christopher R. Mitchell 1. Introduction 76 2. A Framework for Enquiry 76 3. Change and Conflict Formation 78 3.1 Change, Deprivation and Instability 78 3.2 Changes in Scarcity and Abundance 80 3.3 Disaggregating “Change” 81 4. Varieties and Impact of Change 82 4.1 Change in the Structure of a Conflict 82 4.2 Key Qualities of Change 83 5. The Dynamics of “Perpetuation”, “Exacerbation” and “Mitigation” 85 5.1 “Escalation” as a Basic...»

«Progression END OF LIFE This document is one in a five-part series on the stages of Alzheimer’s disease and is written for the person with the disease, their family1 and caregivers. The end of life stage of the disease is featured in this sheet. For information on the other stages of the disease, please see the following sheets in the series: The Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease – Early Stage; Middle Stage; and Late Stage. For a general overview of the disease, its stages and the...»

«LANGUAGE IN INDIA Strength for Today and Bright Hope for Tomorrow Volume 11 : 1 January 2011 ISSN 1930-2940 Managing Editor: M. S. Thirumalai, Ph.D. Editors: B. Mallikarjun, Ph.D. Sam Mohanlal, Ph.D. B. A. Sharada, Ph.D. A. R. Fatihi, Ph.D. Lakhan Gusain, Ph.D. K. Karunakaran, Ph.D. Jennifer Marie Bayer, Ph.D. S. M. Ravichandran, Ph.D. G. Baskaran, Ph.D. Oatesian World of Violence and Female Victimization An Autopsy J. Samuel Kirubahar, Ph.D....»

«Batman The Dark Knight Rulesheet By by Daniel Bradford and Michael Spiegel This is a Rulesheet for Batman: The Dark Knight by Stern Pinball, based on factory settings, originally written in German by Michael Spiegel aka Spiderman of the German pinball forum http://www.flippermarkt.de/community/ It was translated using Google translate, and rewritten by me in a different style but using lots of Michael’s photos and layout. If you find errors, please let us know so we can change them I’m...»

«Copyright by Elaine Louise Ellerton 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Elaine Louise Ellerton Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: ZINC-FINGER TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS AND THE RESPONSE OF NON-MYELINATING SCHWANN CELLS TO AXONAL INJURY Committee: Mendell Rimer, Supervisor Wesley J. Thompson, Co-supervisor Nigel Atkinson Harold Zakon Ted Mills ZINC-FINGER TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS AND THE RESPONSE OF NON-MYELINATING SCHWANN CELLS TO AXONAL INJURY by Elaine Louise...»

«WHERE ARE WE HEADED? GPS DEVICES IN THE CLASSROOM Presentation by Bill Hornback & Kyle Holmes August 3, 2016 I. INTRODUCTION In 2017, this hypothetical situation may be tracking your District: A parent of a special needs student purchases a GPS device that the student wears beneath their clothing. The device was purchased because the student's disability causes the student to elope (wander off or away from where the student is supposed to be). The elopement may never have been a problem in your...»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.