FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials

Pages:   || 2 |

«Alan Cholodenko (The) Death (of) the Animator, or: the Felicity of Felix PartI: The Kingdom of Shadows1 The night of the 4th of July 1896 was a ...»

-- [ Page 1 ] --

Animation Studies – Animated Dialogues, 2007

Alan Cholodenko

(The) Death (of) the Animator, or: the Felicity of Felix

PartI: The Kingdom of Shadows1

The night of the 4th of July 1896 was a special night for cinema. It was the night that Maxim

Gorky attended the screening of the Lumière brothers projections at the Nizhny-Novgorod fair

in Russia and wrote the first significant review of cinema, a review that for me as for Tom

Gunning offers us the first substantial account of the experience of cinema, a rich, indeed paradigmatic, guide to cinema and its abiding senses, sensations. For me, and it appears Gunning, Gorky’s extraordinary ‘first sight’ of cinema defines the very experience of cinema spectatorship (and also too cinema analysis, film theory).

When I say Gunning and I, I reference his canonical article ‘An Aesthetic of Astonishment:

Early Film and the (In)credulous Spectator’ (Gunning 1989) and my article ‘The Crypt, the Haunted House, of Cinema’ (Cholodenko 2004). My article extends, qualifies and recasts Gunning’s formulation in ‘An Aesthetic of Astonishment’ of his notion of the cinema of attractions, also by rereading Gorky’s review. It is crucial to understand at the outset that Gunning’s re-modelling of early cinema as his cinema of attractions has become the orthodoxy in Film Studies.

Although I have precious little space to take up not only Gunning’s but my article here, let me make it clear that I am nevertheless in this new paper adding to and enlarging upon the work I did in my article on his. So while I do rehearse points I made there, I am also animating what I take to be pivotal new ideas from a return engagement with his and my text. It is an engagement allowing me to propose (in section I) that Gunning confirms my still apparently radical notion for animation studies, articulated in so many publications, that not only is animation a form of film, all film, including cinema by definition, is a form of animation. Moreover, it allows me to argue not only the singular importance of animation to cinema and to film but (in section II) the singular importance of death to animation, hence to cinema and to film.

I What is key for my thesis here is that in his article Gunning describes the ‘ur’ attraction, shock, and experience of the earliest cinema – the experience in and by which it demonstrated its powers to the spectator – as the sudden transformation, the ‘magical metamorphosis,’ from the ‘all too familiar’ still photographic image into the all too strange mobile cinematographic image of living moving shadows of people and things. Gunning emphasises the fact that at the start of each show the still image was held frozen long enough to disappoint spectators, making them believe they were being conned and just at an all too familiar display of photographs; and only once that feeling had set in was the projector suddenly cranked into action, turning that image into something all too strange. Quoting Gorky’s famous words describing the unfreezing of the photographic image (words never not evoking Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Dr Frankenstein’s animating of his creature) – ‘Suddenly a strange flicker passes through the screen and the picture The title of this paper is to be read ‘Death the Animator, the Death of the Animator, or: The Felicity of Felix.’ A second part of this paper, subtitled ‘A Difficulty in the Path of Animation Studies,’ was presented at the 2007 Society for Animation Studies conference in Portland, Oregon, 29 June – 1 July. It is published in the SAS journal Animation Studies, vol. 2, 2007, on-line at: http://journal.animationstudies.org/

Animation Studies – Animated Dialogues, 2007

stirs to life’ – Gunning sums up this process, what he calls ‘this cataclysmic event,’ as ‘this still projection takes on motion, becomes endowed with animation, and it is this unbelievable moving image that so astounds’ (Gunning 1989, pp. 34, 35).

There it is: that word – animation, ‘becomes endowed with animation.’ Though Gunning does not conduct any explicit examination of this term ‘animation’ and its implications for an understanding of the process, he unwittingly makes my case for me. To put that case simply, animation is the first attraction of the cinema. And as I shall propose, more: its last attraction. And more yet: its enduring attraction.

What so attracts is the animating by a mechanical apparatus – its metamorphosing of the still, the inanimate, into the mobile, the animate. And what that animating effectuates – in this case the metamorphosis from photographic image to cinematographic image. And what is animated thereby – ‘this unbelievable moving image that so astounds.’ And what is animated within that image – living moving shadows of people and things. And what is animated within the spectator.

And what is animated within (and thence without) that space/place/room. All of which commingle inextricably – the work of animation as the animatic.

Let me pause to say: I theorize the animatic as not only the very logics, processes, performance and performativity of animation but the very ‘essence’ of animation – the animation and animating of animation. The animatic – the very singularity of animation – is anterior and superior to animation. It subsumes animation, is its very condition of at once possibility and impossibility. It is at once the inanimation in and of animation and animation in and of inanimation. The animatic is that nonessence enabling and at the same time disenabling animation as ‘essence,’ including Eisenstein’s plasmaticness as ‘essence’ (which is why I put essence in quotation marks). The animatic makes every animation always already a reanimation.

The animatic is not simply different but radically, irreducibly Other.

At this point we need to consider the consequences of Gunning’s and my animating attractions in light of his now canonical notion of the cinema of attractions, the cinema for him defining the earliest, what used to be called the ‘primitive,’ phase of cinema, generally from 1895 to 1905 or so, cinema’s ‘childhood,’ as it were. The cinema of attractions is an exhibitionist cinema of direct address, indeed confrontation, of the viewer, providing the viewer with attractions in the form of shocks, thrills, chills, delights, frights, joys, terrors, curiosities, like trains coming directly at the viewer, threatening death… Here a key claim: insofar as Gunning makes animation the first attraction of cinema, he makes his cinema of attractions animation of attractions. While attraction, as term of drawing, from the Latin trahere, means to draw to and is the opposite of repulsion, this kind of attraction animates at once attraction and repulsion, delight and fright, joy and terror. Or rather, and better, as term, figure and performance of the graphematic (Cholodenko 2000) and animatic after Jacques Derrida, this kind of attraction graphematically animates and animatically graphs/grafts both attraction and repulsion, neither attraction nor repulsion, at the same time. It animates the at once attraction of the repulsion and repulsion of the attraction, the delight in the fright and fright in the delight, the at once joy in the terror and terror in the joy. Such animatic affects inextricably commingle, exchange, reverse on each other, irretrievably blurring the distinction between them.

And, crucially, insofar as these moments of shock, of thrills and chills, of ‘suddenlys,’ defining the cinema of attractions persist for Gunning beneath his cinema of narrative integration, providing an ‘underground current flowing beneath narrative logic and diegetic realism’ (Gunning 1989, p. 38) and that periodically erupts in that cinema, that animation of attractions

Animation Studies – Animated Dialogues, 2007

and these attractions of animation persist for us.2 Even as, of course, the re-emergence for Gunning of the cinema of attractions in the ‘Spielberg-Lucas-Coppola cinema of effects’ (Gunning 1986, p. 70) in the 1970s and 1980s marks that reanimation of the animation of attractions as hyperanimation of hyperattractions, that is, the increasingly pervasive impact of the reanimation of film animation as digital film animation, as the hyperanimatographic, which would be, by the by, of the order of the hyperanimatic and hypergraphematic.

So, to sum up: in elaborating the nature of his cinema of attractions, Gunning unwittingly makes animation the first attraction of cinema, the last attraction of cinema and the enduring attraction of cinema, thereby likewise unwittingly makes his cinema of attractions animation of attractions.

II But for me there is yet far more to this animation of attractions and these attractions of animation. It has to do with the nature and character of this animating, this reanimating, including of the spectator, what might be called the attraction ‘as such,’ the ‘ur’ attraction. And it

is to Gorky’s review we turn to reach at this, with its famous opening lines:

Last night I was in the Kingdom of Shadows.

If you only knew how strange it is to be there. It is a world without sound, without colour.

Everything there – the earth, the trees, the people, the water and the air – is dipped in monotonous grey. Grey rays of the sun across the grey sky, grey eyes in grey faces, and the leaves of the trees are ashen grey. It is not life but its shadow, it is not motion but its soundless spectre.

Here I shall try to explain myself, lest I be suspected of madness or indulgence in symbolism. I was at Aumont’s and saw Lumière’s cinématograph – moving photography. (Gorky quoted in Harding & Popple 1996, p. 5) ‘Not life but its shadow,’ ‘not motion but its soundless spectre.’ As I argue in ‘The Crypt, the Haunted House, of Cinema,’ Gorky’s paradigmatic experience of cinema makes the spectre ‘ur’ figure of cinema and the uncanny ‘ur’ experience of cinema. Indeed, I propose there that what Gorky describes as his experience of cinema would be the effect of the spectre, the spectre of cinema and its whole set of affects/shocks/attractions composing the ‘ur’ experience of cinema as form of animation for me – making that ‘ur’ experience what I call the Cryptic Complex of the uncanny, the return of death as spectre, endless mourning and melancholia and cryptic incorporation (Cholodenko 2004, p. 107).

Cryptic incorporation lies beyond projection and introjection, is the simulation of introjection, and creates a crypt for a spectre inside the self, safe both from life and from death. It is a place that can never experience closure, from which this living dead speaks as ‘the unconscious of the other,’ turning the incorporated, encrypted self into a haunted house, ‘the haunt of a host of ghosts,’ writes Derrida (1986, p. xxiii). One might say that the affect of cinema is the special effect of the spectre. The spectre would be for me the ‘ur’ figure of cinema, could it be ‘ur’ figure, which by definition it cannot, could cinema have an ‘ur’ figure, which by definition, as form of animation as the animatic, it cannot. The spectre operates not only at every second at every level in every aspect of every film but also at the level of the cinematic, or rather animatic, apparatus of Insofar as the cinema of attractions subtends the cinema of narrative integration, provides its foundation, as it were, it is a foundation always already uprooted, a foundation without foundation, likewise making that which is built upon it, the cinema of narrative integration, always already uprooted, making any such ‘integration’ by definition impossible. See my ‘The Crypt, the Haunted House, of Cinema,’ p. 104.

Animation Studies – Animated Dialogues, 2007

film, hence at the level of film ‘as such.’ It operates therefore to confound cinema, film, subject and world, knotting them inextricably, making it impossible thereafter to definitively distinguish them.

Furthermore, I propose in my article that, in characterising the complex logics and operations of the experience of cinema with such loaded terms as ‘canny’ and ‘uncanny,’ Gunning himself, though he never addresses the uncanny, again unwittingly supports my reading. In fact, I propose there that for me all that Gunning says of the advent of the cinema is already in Freud’s logics of the uncanny, that the attraction, film (including therefore cinema) and all the more animation are of the order of the uncanny.3 For Freud, as many of you readers know, the uncanny has to do with the return of what gave us a fright when we were children to give us a fright again as adults.

It suggests that the adult is never only adult but always at the same time child, too, even as it posits two sides to itself – the psychological and the anthropological – two necessarily commingled, cryptically incorporated sides. Which means that what returns from one’s own childhood is allied with what returns from the childhood of the human – our primitive animistic fears of the return of the dead. And in both the nature of animation is at stake. For the uncanny has to do with life and death, with the reanimation of that fright at seeing the dead return to life as living dead: both alive and dead, neither alive nor dead, at the same time. And the fear that they would not only haunt and continue to haunt us but harm us, even take us away with them, turn us into one of them, even are taking us away with them, are turning us into one of them – becoming one of the living dead, one of the undead, ourselves (which is co-incorporating the Cryptic Complex effects!). For Freud, all uncanny returns/reanimations are stand-ins for his Death Drive. It is death that returns, death that reanimates, as lifedeath.

Such would be the primal experience of cinema, a shocking, traumatic experience of animation, of reanimation – of the animation, reanimation, of death – that even the sophisticated Gorky rehearses for us in his account of the unaccountable, account of Freud’s most striking example of the uncanny – haunting – the ‘relation to death and dead bodies, to the return of the dead, and to spirits and ghosts,’ as Derrida puts it (1994, p. 195, note 38), making cinema – the crypt, the haunted house, of cinema – privileged example of Freud’s ‘unheimlich’ (haunted) house. House of the living dead, a house, never a home.

Pages:   || 2 |

Similar works:

«SCHOOL OF DRAMA, FILM AND MUSIC TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN HANDBOOK 2013-2014 M.PHIL. IN THEATRE AND PERFORMANCE www.tcd.ie/drama Contents 1. Drama Department Staff 2. Term dates 2013-14 3. Programme of Study for the M.Phil. in Theatre and Performance 4. Assessment 5. Style Requirements for Written Submissions 6. How to Submit Essays 7. How to Submit Dissertations 8. Important Safety Issues for Students Welcome to the M.Phil. in Theatre and Performance. The course offers a study of movement...»

«Page 1 of 23 Exploring the Multidimensionality of the Smartphone Divide: A New Aspect of the Digital Divide I. Introduction: Smartphone Revolution It is clear by now that the smartphone is fundamentally changing the way users access information and interact with their social networks. The advent of smartphones and their wide usage even among low-income communities and communities of different races has also changed the dynamics of the digital divide debates, opening up the possibility that some...»

«The Horus Throne Chapter One Live or die? No matter what I did, I’d be damned for it. By now, the whole world knew that I had claimed the throne of Egypt. If I lived, my reign was expected to be wretched, forgettable and brief. If I died, my people would be defenceless before our enemies lurking here and abroad, hungering for the soft throat of Egypt. These were the kinds of bargains the gods laid before a woman who had become a king. In theory, I was the most powerful person on earth, yet I...»

«Šifra kandidata: Državni izpitni center *M10224121* JESENSKI IZPITNI ROK Osnovna raven ANGLEŠČINA Izpitna pola 1 A) Bralno razumevanje B) Poznavanje in raba jezika Torek, 31. avgust 2010 / 80 minut (40 + 40) Dovoljeno gradivo in pripomočki: Kandidat prinese nalivno pero ali kemični svinčnik, svinčnik HB ali B, radirko in šilček. Kandidat dobi list za odgovore. SPLOŠNA MATURA NAVODILA KANDIDATU Pazljivo preberite ta navodila. Ne odpirajte izpitne pole in ne začenjajte reševati...»

«The Keyway ROTARY CLUB OF WAGGA WAGGA SUNRISE Inc. DISTRICT 9700 PO Box 5430 Wagga Wagga 2650 NSW Meeting Venue: elements @ the gardens, Tom Wood Drive, Wagga Wagga, (02) 69255660 Meeting Time: Breakfast 7.00am for 7.15am, completed by 8.30am 29th June 2016 Rotary Fellowship Month PROGRAM: International Fellowship of Cricket Loving Rotarians ATTENDANCE NO: 21 members. VISITING ROTARIANS: David Benn, Jim Gibson and John Gray (Wollundry RC – above) APOLOGIES: Denis & Louise Blackett, Wendy Day,...»

«Login or Sign up Search Stories Firehose All Popular Polls Deals Submit 96 Topics: Devices Build Entertainment Technology Open Source Science YRO Follow us: Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter Nickname: Password: 6-20 characters long Public Terminal Forgot your password? Log In Sign in with Google Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Close × Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices....»

«Copyright by Clifford Farrington The Dissertation Committee for Clifford Farrington certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Biracial Unions on Galveston’s Waterfront, 1865-1925 Committee: ––––––––––––––––––––––––– Mark C. Smith, Supervisor ––––––––––––––––––––––––– Janet Davis ––––––––––––––––––––––––– Shelley...»

«Richard Osborne Colonial Film Essays The homepage for the essays is located at: http://www.colonialfilm.org.uk/. The web address for each essay is included in the individual entries. 2 Contents 2ND BATTALION 4TH BOMBAY GRENADIERS IN INDIA, CA 1930 2ND BATTALION WELCH REGIMENT IN INDIA CELEBRATE GHELUVELT DAY, 1933 A DAY IN CEYLON A NATIVE STREET IN INDIA A ROAD IN INDIA A STRING OF BEADS A TEA GARDEN IDYLL A VILLAGE IN INDIA ACHIEVEMENT IN HONG KONG AIR FORCE AND JAPS DOWNED, BURMA, 30 JANUARY...»

«Habitual Aspect Marking in Palenquero: Variation in Present Temporal Reference Hiram L. Smith The Pennsylvania State University 1. Introduction ∗ The present study analyzes the variable expression of habitual aspect in the Spanish-lexified creole, Palenquero (or Lengua), spoken in the Afro-Hispanic community of San Basilio de Palenque, Colombia. Under investigation is whether tense-aspect expressions in Palenquero function as grammatical markers. Specifically, to what degree is asé a...»

«VOICES OF FIRE – SPIRITUAL ENTITIES AND PERSONALITY by David K. Stolowitz, B.A. Abstract This essay is part of an ongoing research and writing project exploring the metaphysical nature and identity of the entities acknowledged as gods and spirits by polytheistic religions. It reintroduces the ancient metaphysical field of daemonology as an important element within philosophy and mysticism. Emanation Theory, as expounded by traditions such as the Qabala and Neoplatonism, is used as a context...»

«THE SIMULACRUM SURFACED: A STUDY ON THE NATURE OF THE IMAGE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF GRAPHIC DESIGN AND THE INSTITUTE OF FINE ARTS OF BILKENT UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF FINE ARTS by Evren Erlevent June 2004 I certify that I have read this thesis and that in my opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Fine Arts.... Assist. Prof. Andreas Treske (Principal Advisor) I certify...»

«THE VETSPECS® CAPNO-40 VETERINARY MAINSTREAM CAPNOGRAPH WITH PULSE OXIMETER USER’S MANUAL The Capno-40 is for veterinary use only. VETSPECS EUROPE CO., LTD.-1www.VetSpecsEU.com CONTENTS I. Installation 1 II. Clinical instructions 4 2.1 Digital mainstream capnography 4 2.2 Pulse oximetry 11 III. Operational instructions 15 3.1 Control Panel 15 3.2 Menu system 16 3.3 Save information 19 3.4 Transfer saved information to your PC 20 3.5 Review information on your PC 21 IV. Maintenance 29 V....»

<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.