WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 18 | 19 || 21 | 22 |   ...   | 25 |

«DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD SUMMER STUDY TASK FORCE ON INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE FOR THE BATTLEFIELD DTlC OCTOBER 1994 S ELECTE APR I 0 1995' G i 95-01137 I ...»

-- [ Page 20 ] --

we exploit the unique and rapid evolution in commercial information technologies; and finally, that we ensure adequate protection against potential vulnerabilities in our evolving information systems.

C-174.0 NET ASSESSMENT AND RED TEAM CAPABILITY

The security of information systems and networks is considered by the Joint Security Commission to be the major security challenge of the decade and possibly the next century. In this era of information warfare, DoD needs the capability to detect, react, and recover from an information warfare attack. INFOSEC is an important element of our information security program, but protection of information content and local availability and data integrity are not enough. In addition, network control, automated data processing centers and information systems must be assessed for ease of repair and reconstitution of the overall information infrastr. - re.

–  –  –

Referring to Figure C-7 above, DoD information systems and the National Information Infrastructure are playing an increasingly important role in the effective conduct of military operations. U.S. offensive information warfare capabilities offer great promise in providing a critical advantage across the information warfare spectrum in all kinds of operations. At the same time, our adversaries' growing information warfare capabilities are increasing the vulnerability of both DoD and national systems and have the potential to degrade the effectiveness of military systems and operations. Because of the significant leverage and C-18

potential vulnerabilities associated with our Information Systems, we urgently need to evaluate:

Operational Performance Effectiveness of our evolving C4I Systems;

"* Robustness and Vulnerability of our systems to Information Warfare;

"* Potential Adversaries' C4I Capabilities;

"* Vulnerabilities of Adversaries' C41 to our Information Warfare capabilities; and "* Net Assessment of our Warfighter Information Systems.

"* Accordingly, the Panel recommends that the SECDEF direct that these assessments be accomplished promptly and actions to address shortfalls and needed improvements be identified.

In addition, the Panel recommends that the SECDEF direct the establishment of a "Red Team" capability to continually test our readiness and vuinerabilities. It should be integrated with our other assessment and exercise activities; be coordinated with parallel activities in the Intelligence Community; and be audited by the ASD (C3M).

–  –  –

Figure D-1 The Information System Must Adapt

Figure D-2 Flexible, Innovative Use of C4I Systems

Figure D-3 Dynamic Information Management for the CINC/JTF

Figure D-4 C41 For The Warrior (C4IEFW)

Figure D-5 Popular Definitions for "Architecture.

Figure D-6 Current DoD "Architecture" Initiatives

Figure D-7 Popular Definitions for Architecture - Information Architecture

Figure D-8 What the Architect Does

Figure D-9 Architectural Tradeoffs

Figure D-10 Technology for Multi-Level Security

Figure D-11 Refocus Investment Areas in Information & Information Systems Protection.D-18 Figure D-12 Align Processes with Life-Cycles

Figure D-13 Interoperability in the Information Architecture

Figure D-14 Specifications and Standards

Figure D-15 Technology Status and Trends

Figure D-16 Key Technology Drivers

Figure D-17 Forefront Technologies

Figure D-18 R&D for Information Dominance

Figure D-19 Enhanced Reconfigurability

Figure D-20 Information and Information Systems Protection

Figure D-21 Recommendation - Prioritize R&D Investment with Focus on Military-Unique Information Technology

D-Hi

INTRODUCTION

1.0 Tasking Assignment 1.1 The Task Force convened three times as a group during the early summer to receive briefings on relevant Government initiatives and programs, and to plan its approach to the

Summer Study. The Task Force created four Panels as follows:

Warfighters Panel to address Information in Warfare "* Information Warfare Panel to address Information Warfare "• Management Panel to address Business Practices "* Technology Panel to address the Underlying Technology Base "* This appendix is the Final Report of the Technology Panel which was charged with addressing architectural challenges and research and development investment thrusts. The

panel addressed its tasks by examining:

* Information system architectural and technical capabilities needed to respond to the Warfighter's needs;

e "Architectures" and their meaning, essential to understanding R&D investment contributions to meeting the warriors' functional architectural needs;

* The role of the architect and technical challenges to be faced;

* Technology trends in information systems that influence the options available to meet the Task Force goals; and o R&D investment thrusts to enable better management of information on the battlefield.

These themes formed the major focus of the Panel's assessments, and will be addressed in various ways in the report which follows.

–  –  –

Government Advisors who contributed to the Technology Panel's efforts were as follows:





"* Dr. Duane Adams [ARPA] "* Col. George W. (Bill) Criss, III USAF [BMDO] "* Mr. George Endicott [ASD (C31)] * Mr. Gene Famolari [Army] * Col. Thomas Hall, USA [Army] Ms. Beth Larson [CIO] * Mr. Harold McDonough [NSA] * Mr. Steven Schanzer [Intelligence] • D-1 * Dr. David Signori, Jr, [DISA] * Mr. Joseph Toma [Joint Staff] * MajGen Julio Torres, USAF [DISA] Excellent technical and administrative support to the Panel was provided by Dr. Nancy Chesser of Directed Technologies, Inc.

1.3 Background Recent history suggests future Tnilitary operating continua extend over a wide variety of activities. The potential for changing from one level of engagement to another is relatively high and the speed with which such changes can occur can be rapid. Management of information is an important ingredient, to both sides of a confrontation, for determining the outcome of an engagement. Modem information systems products are available to adversaries as well as U.S. forces; consequently innovative use of those systems is important for U.S.

information dominance of the battlefield. Innovation is particularly dependent on our ability to reconfigure both how systems are interconnected and how information is managed among C41 systems. Reconfigurability is not merely a mechanical or electrical connectivity question

- it is an information management issue. Consider the variety of information management schemes possible versus the limited number of options for information management in today's systems.

Many architecture initiatives are underway - but OSD technology investment refocus is needed for data, access, and vulnerability management. Focused research and development (R&D) investment, coupled with a responsive information architecture derivation process, is needed to shake-out the functional flexibilities needed, to develop the tools for managing information architecture options, and to derive the most useful forms of information management flexibility. It will begin with concentration on the information to be exchanged around the battlefield, and conclude witf 1 selection of appropriate information management schemes and selection of communicatit._1s devices and circuits which allow conformance with chosen information management strategies.

Prior to instituting battlefield plans for reconfigurable systems, provisions for reconfigurability must be developed. The acquisition processes must encourage the inclusion of reconfiguration properties into new or modernized systems. Migration incentives should be incorporated in the acquisition process, together with provisions for maintaining responsiveness with respect to the life-cycles of the technology involved - it does little good to establish sound information management systems if they are three generations behind those of adversaries.

R&D initiatives can be overlaid on the Information in Warfare/Information Warfare battlefield to reveal appropriate investment candidates. Investment is needed to foster improved reconfigurability options; and investment is needed to manage the new possibilities of information warfare.

INFORMATION ARCHITECTURE TO MEET BATTLEFIELD NEEDS

2.0 2.1 Adaptable Information Systems As shown in Figure D-1, since the fall of the Berlin Wall, there have been many contingency operations confronting the U.S., marked with substantial uncertainty, delicate international relationships, and operational conditions which challenge our ability to manage infor

–  –  –

Figure D-1 There is a great uncertainty concerning where, when, why, and with whom U.S.

military forces may be engaged in the future. For each situation the particular geography, local infrastructure, rules of engagement, threat sophistication, arrangements with coalitions and allies, and the CINC and JTF commanders' desired command structure will all drive the C41 needs.

There is a need for an information architecture which will allow flexible but responsive support for the warfighter intent on not only protecting the prime national security interests of the United States, but also conducting a variety of important contingency operations. The information architecture must support flexible assembly of capability, flexible application of capability, and rapid responsiveness to changes in the complexion of operations. As a result, a

refocus in R&D investment is necessary to do two things:

" Provide the ability to more flexibly configure interoperation among C4M systems and develop tools and techniques for dynamically managing the flow of information around the battlefield among the newly reconfigurable C41 systems; and " Improve our ability to execute information warfare. This involves both technology to enhance protection of our own systems, as well as technology to conduct offensive operations against an adversary's information management system.

2.2 Keys to Information Dominance in the Battlefield As the information systems market matures, there are more and more technically capable resources on the open market that are capable of supporting military operations. Only a D-3 few years ago, most of that technology was of the class used for office automation. Commercial management information systems were also becoming more and more attractive in their off the shelf form rather than custom development. But, for the most part, it was seldom reasonable to expect commercial products to produce the robust, technically advanced capabilities that would give a warfighter an advantage in the field. Sophisticated information systems continued to be custom developments, and sophisticated electronic devices were only available after expensive development and integration processes made them suitable for operation in the rugged environment of a battlefield. As indicated in Figure D-2, the U.S. ability to underwrite the required investment kept our forces at the forefront of technical capability.

–  –  –

Figure D-2 More recently, not only have office automation capabilities expanded, but there are also complementing advances in sophisticated technology from the commercial market. GPS, mapping systems, night vision devices, satellite imagery, etc. are all available to one degree or another from the open market. It is unlikely to presume improvements in price and capability won't continue. While U.S. advanced sensor technology is likely to continue to provide our forces with a substantial data gathering advantage, much of the effectiveness of that advantage could be dissipated if the information garnered by the sensors is not managed more effectively than adversaries manage their information.

Key to continuing dominance on the battlefield will be our ability to maintain pace with the commercial market, and, perhaps more important, our ability to apply the technology with coordination and innovation among our forces. Such coordination requires development and fielding of tools to aid that process, practice and training in how to coordinate information management among diverse C41 systems, and, based on such practice and experience, evolution of an information architecture which provides U.S. warfighters with the most flexible and responsive C41 systems on the "battlefield."

The wide availability of battlefield-capable information systems technology suggests that there are increasing opportunities for information warfare. New vulnerabilities must be managed by the U.S. as it depends more on sophisticated information systems, and new vulnerabilities may be exploited by the U.S. when adversaries use similar products.

In addition to the obvious management and process demands on the DoD, there are key R&D investments that will contribute to improved innovation with respect to the warfighters' C41 assets. This panel attempted to identify relevant areas for technology investment.

D4 To address the research and development investments key to this approach, one must no start in the traditional manner by selecting the communications hardware and then deciding what data may be overlaid on the physical assets of the communications forces. Instead, it is important to begin with consideration of the information to be sent throughout the system.

After the information is identified, then appropriate approaches can be designed for how hiformation access will be managed, how vulnerabilities of the irfornmation will be managed, and lastly over what physical resources the information will be exchanged. Only after defining the information schemes, can mechanisms for managing access, vulnerability, and connections be established. The technology, systems and commercial communications are available at a reasonable cost to support overcoming these challenges.

2.3 Enhanced Reconfigurability As is discussed in Section 3.3 of the main report, one key aspect of innovation is the ability to reconfigure forces and systems. Joint Task Forces tend to be assembled from a variety of assets trained and equipped by the Services. Further, the compositions of forces will likely vary in both the size of components integrated into a joint force, and the sources providing assets.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 18 | 19 || 21 | 22 |   ...   | 25 |


Similar works:

«IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CA-01567-SCT TAMMY WATKINS, ON BEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH HEIRS OF AUSTIN JAMES WATKINS v.MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/18/2012 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. JEFF WEILL, SR.COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HINDS COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: JOSEPH E. ROBERTS, JR. EUGENE COURSEY TULLOS ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: ROBERT E. SANDERS NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL WRONGFUL DEATH DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED 02/27/2014 MOTION...»

«A HELLENISTIC TERRACOTTA GROUP FROM CORINTH 67 AND 68) (PLATES Xj7j T HEN consideringlarge-scaleterracottasculptureof the late Classicaland Hellenistic periods, one tends to think of Italy more than of Greece and of the architectural and votive terracottasfrom Etruscan and Campanian sites. The amount of known and slight. Summedup by Laumonierin 1956 publishedmaterialfrom Greece is comparatively in his publicationof a large-scalehead from Delos, the corpus has not changednoticeably.1 That...»

«Jeremy Star Science Communication Essay 12 April 2013 The importance of considering the target audience when communicating environmental issues There are many pressing environmental issues facing humans such as global warming, resource shortages, and pollution.1 Scientists are well aware of these problems and after collecting extensive data they have reached a consensus that human society cannot continue in its current direction.2 There is an urgent need to communicate this information and also...»

«Township Textualities Megan Jones Abstract The paper is part literature review and part critique. It begins with an analysis of recent theorizations emerging in local and international urban studies before moving to a consideration of the ways in which the township has been historically engaged across literature and criticism. Noting the absence of substantial work on the township in post-apartheid literary criticism, it seeks to address both the reasons for this aporia and to map the themes...»

«Fun and Games in Reviewing Neonatal Emergency Care By: Debbie W Gordon, RN, MSN Hazel N. Brown, RNC, EdD Gordon, D. W., & Brown, H. N. (1995). Fun and Games in reviewing neonatal emergency care. Neonatal Network, 14(3), 45-49. Made available courtesy of Neonatal Network: http://www.neonatalnetwork.com/ ***Note: Figures may be missing from this format of the document Abstract: Objective: To develop a game-based review instrument for use by newborn caregivers in preparing for emergency...»

«WRITING TO YOUR POST OF ASSIGNMENT Who Receives Your Formal Letter/s? Page 1 Guidance for Letter to Principal Officer Page 2 How to Address Officers Page 2 What Should I Write About? Page 2 What NOT To Say Page 2 How to Print an Envelope Using the Computer Page 3 How to Send by Pouch or via APO/FPO: Page 4 Writing to Your Post Template Page 4 Writing to Your Post Example Page 5 When to Communicate with Your Post Page 6 Formal, Official and Information/ Unofficial Emails to Post Page 6-7 Who...»

«There are things that we don't want to happen but have to accept, things we don't want to know but have to learn, and people we can't live without but have to let go. ~Author Unknown It's so curious: one can resist tears and 'behave' very well in the hardest hours of grief. But then someone makes you a friendly sign behind a window, or one notices that a flower that was in bud only yesterday has suddenly blossomed, or a letter slips from a drawer. and everything collapses. ~Colette Some general...»

«1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-8430 Facsimile: (202) 862-0757 www.pcaobus.org       ) ) ORDER INSTITUTING DISCIPLINARY ) PROCEEDINGS, MAKING FINDINGS, PCAOB Release No. 105-2013-010 ) AND IMPOSING SANCTIONS ) November 21, 2013 ) In the Matter of Acquavella, Chiarelli, ) Shuster, Berkower & Co., LLP ) ) Respondent. ) ) By this Order, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the Board or PCAOB) is censuring Acquavella, Chiarelli, Shuster, Berkower & Co.,...»

«2 MEGALITHS and MEGA-TALKS GEOLOGY 19-20 November 2015 Centro Cultural do Redondo Redondo, Portugal http://www.uniarq.net/mega-talks-2.html Program and Abstracts Programa e Resumos Organization / Organização: Rui Boaventura (Uniarq; FCT; Portanta) Rui Mataloto (Município do Redondo;Uniarq; Portanta) André Pereira (Uniarq) Mega-Talks 2 – Megaliths and Geology: moving rocks in the Neolithic. National and international researchers gather in the village of Redondo on the 19th and 20th...»

«BA (HONS) ACTING: GUIDANCE FOR APPLICANTS (FEMALE) Your Initial Audition PUNCTUALITY You should make sure you arrive in plenty of time for your audition; if for any reason you will be late please let us know. Punctuality is essential during the course, as it is when working in the profession. We are aware that sometimes transport is delayed – however, we will expect you to have arranged your travel to arrive on time even if there is a reasonable delay. Directions to the School and a map are...»

«NI-LES′TUN ARCHAEOLOGY: THE BUSSMANN, BLUE BARN, AND OLD TOWN BANDON SITES BY MARK TVESKOV AND AMIE COHEN with contributions by Scott Byram, Kelly Derr, Don Ivy, Troy Linville, Aaron Reed, Ben Shotwell, and Zachariah Rodriguez SOULA Research Report 2007-1 Southern Oregon University Laboratory of Anthropology Ashland, Oregon 2007 © 2007 Southern Oregon University Laboratory of Anthropology Southern Oregon University Ashland, Oregon 97520 ii ABSTRACT This monograph reports on excavations...»

«STANDING COMMITTEE ON ESTIMATES AND FINANCIAL OPERATIONS 2014–15 BUDGET ESTIMATES HEARINGS TRANSCRIPT OF EVIDENCE TAKEN AT PERTH THURSDAY, 12 JUNE 2014 SESSION ONE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COUNTRY HIGH SCHOOLS HOSTELS AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION SERVICES SCHOOL CURRICULUM AND STANDARDS AUTHORITY Members Hon Ken Travers (Chair) Hon Peter Katsambanis (Deputy Chair) Hon Martin Aldridge Hon Alanna Clohesy Hon Rick Mazza Thursday, 12 June 2014 — Session One Estimates and Financial...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.