«13TH INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH CONFERENCE “Ethical Issues for Public Relations Practice in a Multicultural World” Holiday Inn ...»
Shell, Glaxo-SmithKline, and World Vision). Some also provide tips for ensuring secured online transactions (e.g. Standard Charter). Child-oriented websites (e.g. Disney) offer online advice to parents and guardians on ensuring safe internet surfing. This development suggests that while more organisations realize the value of internet resources to advance their goals and build better relations with their publics, they are also cautious about the possible negative implications of internet use for their stakeholders, which may also affect the organisation's reputation. As organisational use of online interactive features are intensified, risks also increase for both the organisation and its online visitors.Thus, internet use by organisations for public relations needs to take into consideration features that ensure the protection of users and the security of transactions made by publics online, an aspect which seems to have received limited attention in previous studies of online public relations and can be explored in greater detail by future studies.
Table 2. Use of Web Features (2009)
*Online shopping and donation include signing in of forms (i.e. online/pledge) and may not cover e-payment
Conclusion and Future Research
These findings also show that for the most part, both corporations and non-profit organizations generally utilize their websites as information-dissemination tools, where the information flow is one-way, although the percentage of corporations and non profits that used two-way communication has increased between 2004 and 2009. We note that two-way communication does not imply symmetry. One also has to recognize that the majority of corporations favoured two-way asymmetrical public relations, while non-profits preferred the public information model. By examining the methods that both for-profit and non-profit organisations use to engage their publics, we can see that the nature and industry of the corporation influences the choice of public relations practiced through its website. The inherent difference between corporations and non-profits makes them define their stakeholder groups differently, which seems to affect their use of web sites for public relations. Even their use of social media reflected this difference.
772 A finding that would be worthy of further study is why as of 2009 many for-profit and non-profit organizations were still a long way from fully utilizing the interactive features of social media to create, among other things, a sense of community among their respective stakeholders. One would have expected that since many of the social media applications are freely available and widely used by millions, corporations and non profits would have jumped at the opportunity to use the interactive features of social media to further enhance their relationship building efforts.
While this study included multinational corporations and non profits, it is limited in that the domestic organizations are from a single Asian country (Singapore). Future studies could do comparative research on how corporations and non profits (local and global) use social media in various countries and across regions (Asia, Africa, Latin America, etc.). Such studies could also make comparisons between developed and less developed countries (particularly assessing the impact of the Digital Divide within and among countries), to better assess the way that organizations around the world are embracing social media for public relations purposes. In addition, future studies could explore whether there are specific sectors (e.g. manufacturing, service, retailing, etc.) that seem to more aggressively embrace social media to enhance the communication with their publics. The possibilities are plentiful for research agendas on online public relations, enough to keep scholars busy for the decades.
Bortree, D.S. & Seltzer, S. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review (35), 317-319.
Cozier, Z. R., & Witmer, D. F. (2007). A Structuralist Approach to the Life Cycle of Internet
Publics and Public Participation. In New Media and Public Relations (pp. 28-41). New York:
Cutlip, S., et.al. (2006). Effective Public Relations. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall Di Maggio P., Hargittai E., (2001): From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use As Penetration Increases", http://www.princeton.edu/~artspol/workpap/WP15%20-%20DiMaggio%2BHargittai.pdf Dougall, E. (2006). Tracking organization-public relationships over time: A framework for longitudinal research. Public Relations Review (32), 174-176 Edelman PR & Intelliseek (2005). Talking from the inside out: The Rise of employee bloggers.
Edelman Public Relations. http://www.edelman.com/image/insights/content/Edelmanintelliseek%20Employee%20Blogging%20White%20Paper.pdf Esrock, S., & Leichty, G. (1998). Social responsibility and corporate web pages: Selfpresentation or agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305–319.
Esrock, S., & Leichty, G. (2000). Organization of corporate web pages: Publics and functions.
Public Relations Review, 26(3), 327–344.
Grunig, J. E. (1992). Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Hallahan, K. (2001). Improving public relations web sites through usability research. Public Relations Review (27), 223-239.
Ha, L., & James, E. (1998). Interactivity reexaminated: A baseline analysis of early business websites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 457–474.
Hill, L. & C. White (2000). Public relations practitioners' perception of the World Wide Web as a communications tool. Public Relations Review (26), 1-31.
Holtz, S. (1999). Public relations on the Net: winning strategies to inform and influence the media, the investment community, the government, the public, and more! New York: AMACOM.
Ingenhoff, D. and M. Koelling (2009). The potential of Web sites as a relationship building tool for charitable fundraising NPOs. Public Relations Review (35), 66-73.
Jo, S., & Kim, Y. (2003). The effect of web characteristics on relationship building. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(3), 199–223.
Kang, S. & Norton, H. E.(2004). Non-profit organisations' use of the World Wide Web: Are they sufficiently fulfilling organisational goals? Public Relations Review 30(3), 279-284 Kelleher, T. (2006). Public relations online: Lasting concepts for changing media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kenix, Linda (2007). In search of Utopia. A Survey of Non-Profit websites. Information, Communication & Society 10(1), 69–94 Kent, M. L., (2008). Critical analysis of blogging in public relations. Public Relations Review 34(1), 32–40.
Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building Dialogic Relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321-334.
Kent, M. L., Taylor, M., & White, W. J. (2003). The relationship between Web site design and organisational responsiveness to stakeholders. Public Relations Review, 29(2003), 63-77 McAllister-Spooner, S. (2008). User Perceptions of Dialogic Public Relations Tactics via the Internet. Public Relations Journal, 2(1), 1-18 Middleberg, D. (2001). Winning PR in the wired world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Naudé, A. M. E., Froneman, J. D., & Atwood, R. A. (2004). The use of the internet by ten South African non-governmental organisations - a public relations perspective. Public Relations Review, 30, 87-94.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Oliver, Sandra (2001). Public Relations Strategy. Institute of Public Relations Pan, P., & Xu, J. (2009). Online strategic communication: A cross-cultural analysis of U.S. and Chinese corporate websites. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 251-253.
Phillips, D. (2001). Online public relations. London; Milford, CT: Institute of Public Relations (Great Britain), Kogan Page.
Phillips, D. and P. Young (2009). Online Public Relations A Practical guide to developing an online strategy in the world of social media (2 ed.). London : Kogan Page Ltd.
PR Week/Burson-Marsteller (2008). Eighth annual Burson-Marsteller/PR Week CEO survey, Fall. Presentation available from: http://www.bursonmarsteller.com/Innovation_and_insights/blogs_and_podcasts/BM_Blog/Documents/2008%20Bu rson-Marsteller%20PRWeek%20CEO%20Study.pdf Rose, R. (2004). Governance and the Internet. In Yusuf, S., Altaf, M.A., & Nabeshima, K. (eds.), Global change and East Asian policy initiatives. New York: World Bank Group Ryan, M. (2003). Public relations and the web: organisational problems, gender, and institution type. Public Relations Review, 29, 335-349.
Schradie, J. (2009). The Digital Production Gap. The Digital Divide and Web 2.0 Collide. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Conference, August 8, Internet and Society Session, San Francisco, CA.
Seltzer, T. & Mitrook, M. (2007). The Dialogic Potential of weblogs in relationship building.
Public Relations Review (33), 227-229.
Sha, B. L. (2007). Dimensions of Public Relations. Moving beyond Traditional Public Relations Models. In S. Duhe (Ed.), New Media and Public Relations (pp. 3-25). New York: Peter Lang Smith, R (2002). Strategic Planning for Public Relations. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Stein, Laura (2007). National Social Movement Organisations and the World Wide Web: A survey of web-based Activities and Attributes.Conference Papers -- International Communication Association, 2007 Annual Meeting Taylor, M., Kent, M., & White, W. (2001). How activist organisations are using the internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review, 27 263–284.
Vorvoreanu, M. (2006). Online organization-public relationships: An experience-centered approach? Public Relations Review, 32, 395-401.
Waters, D., E. Burnett, A. Lamm, and J. Lucas (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organisations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review 35, 102– 106
Wright, D.K. and Hinson, M.D. (2008). How blogs and social media are changing public relations and the way it is practiced. Public Relations Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, Spring, 2008.
Wright, D.K. and Hinson, M.D (2009a). An Updated Look at the Impact of Social Media on Public Relations Practice. Public Relations Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2 Wright, D.K. and Hinson, M.D (2009b). An Analysis of Social Use in Public Relations. A Paper presented for the BledCom Conference, Bled, Solvenia, July.
Xifra, J. & A. Huertas (2008). Blogging PR: An exploratory analysis of public relations weblogs.
Public Relations Review 34, 269–275
IntroductionOn January 2, 2006, explosions rocked a small coal mining town in West Virginia, trapping 13 miners in the Sago Mine. Some 41 hours later, the miners’ families and media worldwide celebrated the astonishing news that 12 men had survived the accident. As we now know, the news proved inaccurate, and only 1 of the 13 miners was found alive. This disaster captured the nation’s attention for its drama and media coverage mistakes, and in its aftermath, Congress passed tougher mine safety legislation. Ironically, that legislation has led to such a backlog of cases that repeat mine violators could go longer before being caught. 19 However, coal mining disasters are nothing new to West Virginia or the nation, and it was another highprofile coal mine disaster that had led to tougher regulations nearly 40 years before.
Even earlier, in 1946, national media were reporting on mining dangers. An Aug. 10 article that year in the Saturday Evening Post, titled “They Don’t Have to Die,” brought the profession’s dangers to light in an emotional feature spread that included the following pull quote: “Spectacular explosions and hair-raising rescues are commonplace in the coal industry.