«13TH INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH CONFERENCE “Ethical Issues for Public Relations Practice in a Multicultural World” Holiday Inn ...»
Lastly, since there is no geographic boundary on the Internet, people can easily access and even join other countries’ SNS, especially if they understand the native languages of the countries.
During the data collection process, the author found some comments that were written by people from countries other than Japan and the U.S. Particularly, BMW’s Facebook communities had several members from various countries. Some people use their native languages and others use English when they post their comments. Therefore, some comments collected from Facebook might not be written by people with individualistic and low context cultures, and there are also possibilities that some comments collected from Mixi were not written by people with collectivistic and high context cultures. At the same time, it raises an interesting question of whether people will adjust their cultural values and change their behaviors in a SNS of a country that has different cultural values with them. Future studies could look into this issue in order to increase our understanding about the influence of cultures on people’s SNS usage.
ReferencesArdichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., & Stuedemann, R. (2006). Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 94-107.
Bortree, D. S., & Seltzer, T. (2009). Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups’ Facebook profiles. Public Relations Review, 35(3), 317Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship [Electronic Version]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, article 11.
Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.
comScore. (2008). Social Networking Explodes Worldwide as Sites Increase their Focus on Cultural Relevance. Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Press_Releases/2008/08/Social_Networking World_Wide.
Connolly-Ahern, C., & Broadway, S. C. (2007). The importance of appearing competent: An analysis of corporate impression management strategies on the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 33, 343-345.
Curtin, P. A. & Gaither, T. K. (2007). International Public Relations: Negotiating Culture, Identity and Power. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cyr, D., Bonanni, C., Bowes, J., & Ilsever, J. (2005). Beyond Trust: Web Site Design Preferences Across Cultures. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(4), 25-54.
Downes, S. (2005). Semantic networks and social networks [Electronic Version]. The Learning Organization: An International Journal, 12, 411-417. Retrieved from http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=31624.
E-Business Laboratory. (2005 February 25). Social Networking Sites “mixi”: current situation
and future strategy. Retrieved September 20 from:
Esrock, S. L., & Leichty, G. B. (1998). Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages:
Self-presentation of agenda-setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3), 305-319.
Facebook. (2009). Statistics. Retrieved from: http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics Ferle, C. L., & Kim, H. (2006). Cultural influences on internet motivations and communication styles: A comparison of Korean and US consumers. International Journal of Marketing and Advertising, 3(2), 142-156.
Gong, W. (2009). National culture and global diffusion of business-to-consumer e-commerce.
Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 83-101.
Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture, New York: Anchor Press.
Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990). Understanding cultural differences. Yarmouth, ME:
Intercultural Press Inc.
Hickson, D. J., & Pugh, D. S. (2003). Management Worldwide: Distinctive Styles Amid Globalization. New York: Penguin Global.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, California: Sage Publications.
Inside Facebook. (2009, March 26). Facebook Crosses 60 Million Monthly US Users, But Fewer
People Over 55 Coming Back. Retrieved September 20 from:
http://www.insidefacebook.com/2009/05/26/facebook-crosses-60-million-monthly-ususers-but-fewer-people-over-55-coming-back/ Internet Association Japan. (2007). Internet White Paper 2007. Impress R&D.
Kang, D. S., and Mastin, T. (2008). How cultural difference affects international tourism public relations websites: A comparative analysis using Hofstede’s cultural dimensions. Public Relations Review, 34, 54-56.
Kassarjian, H. H., (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of ConsumerResearch, 284 4, 8-18.
Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web.
Public Relations Review, 24(3), 321-334.
Kelleher, T., & Miller, B. M. (2006). Organizational blogs and the human voice: Relational strategies and relational outcomes [Electronic Version]. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2), article 1. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/kelleher.html Kirat, M. (2007). Promoting online media relations: Public relations departments’ use of Internet in the UAE. Public Relations Review, 33, 166-174.
Koda, T., Ishida, T., Rehm, M., & André, E. (2009). Avatar culture: cross-cultural evaluations of avatar facial expressions. AI & Society, 24(3), 237-250
Mixi, Inc. (2007, May 21) The number of “mixi” user exceeded 10 million. Retrieved from:
Mooij, M. K. (2005). Global Marketing and Advertising Understanding Cultural Paradoxes.
Minneapolis: Sage Publications, Inc.
Okazaki, S., & Rivas, J. A. (2002). A content analysis of multinational’s Web communication strategies: cross-cultural research framework and pre-testing. Internet Research,12(5), 380-390.
Reber, B. H. & Kim, J. K. (2006). How activist groups use websites in media relations:
Evaluating online press rooms. Journal of public relations research, 18(4), 313-333.
Seltzer, T., & Mitrook, M. A. (2007). The dialogic potential of weblogs in relationship building. Public Relations Review, 33, 227-229.
Sweetser, K. D., & Lariscy, R. W. (2008). Candidates make good friends: An analysis of candidates' uses of Facebook. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 2(3), 175-198.
Sweetser, K. D., Metzgar, E. (2007). Communication during crisis: Use of blogs as a relationship management tool. Public Relations Review, 33, 340-342.
Tian,Y. (2006). Communicating with local publics: a case study of Coca-Cola’s Chinese web site. Corporate Communications, 11(1), 13-22 Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: Findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 90Waters, R. D., Burnett, E., Lamm, A., & Lucas, J. (2009). Engaging stakeholders through social networking: How nonprofit organizations are using Facebook. Public Relations Review, 35(2), 102-106.
Yun, G. W., Park, S., & Ha, L. (2008). Influence of cultural dimensions on online interactive review feature implementations: A comparison of Korean and U.S. retail Web sites.
Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(3), 40-50.
Wright, D. K., & Hinson, M. D. (2009). An analysis of the increasing impact of social and other new media on public relations practice. Presented to 12th Annual International Public Relations Research Conference, Miami, Florida.
Wurtz, E. (2006) Intercultural communication on web sites: A cross-cultural analysis of web sites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11(1), 274-299.
Appendix 1: Coding Sheet
1. Use of visual oriented information: Indicate whether the comment includes visual oriented information below.
1) – Photograph: Photograph means a picture that is made by using a camera.
No / Yes 2) – Emoticon: Emoticon means those pictorial symbols forming a record or communication.
:) :-) ☆ ♥
Abbreviations such as “ lol ” are NOT counted as emoticons.
No / Yes 3) -- Others type of visual oriented information:
No / Yes
2. Disclosure of Personal Information: Indicate whether the comment includes comment writer’s personal information listed below.
1) – Gender No / Yes 2) – Age No / Yes 3) – Occupation No / Yes 4) – Information about where he/she lives No / Yes 5) – Family information No / Yes 6) – Other types of personal information No / Yes
3. Type of Comments: Indicate the type of the comments by circling one of the numbers below. If a comment contains more than two types of meaning, please choose the most salient one. Here, “related products” mean car parts, such as tires, and goods that are used for assisting the driving, such as GPS navigators.
1. Asking for advice and information The comments that ask for advice and information about the brand’s cars, related products, companies that own the brand, and shops that sell the brands’ car or provide services related to the brand’s car.
2. Offering advice and information The comments that offer advice and information about the brand’s cars, related products, the company that owns the brand, and shops that sell the brand’s car or provide services related to the brand’s cars.
3. Showing negative feeling about the brands, companies, and shops The comments that complain or criticize about the brands, the company that owns the brand, and shops that sell the brand’s car or provide services related to the brands’ cars.
4. Showing positive feeling or support for the brands, companies, and shops The comments that express positive feeling or support for the brands, the company that owns the brand, and shops that sell the brand’s car or provide services related to the brands’ cars.
5. Showing neutral feeling about the brands, companies, and shops Telling their thoughts about the brands, the company that owns the brand, and shops that sell the brand’s car or provide services related to the brands’ cars without showing any positive or negative feeling. The comments that are perceived to contain equal amount of negative and positive opinion should be included here as well. In addition, this type also includes those comments that simply state what kind of car they have.
6. Advertising something 61 – Advertising cars or related products The comments that tell people he/she wants to sell new and second hand cars of the brand and related products including car parts and goods that could be used in the car.
62 – Put wanted ads of cars from that brand or related products The comments that tell people he/she wants to buy the brand’s cars or related products 286 through the communities.
63 – Advertising other related online communities or websites The comments that ask people to join online communities or visit websites that are related to the brands.
64 – Advertising something unrelated to the brand.
65 – Others
7. Showing opinion to comments wrote by others The comments that were written mainly for showing appreciation, criticism, or other types of opinion to comments written by others.
71 – Showing appreciation for the comments written by others.
72 – Criticizing or complaining about the comments written by others.
73 – Others
8. Others 81 – Related to the brand 82 – Unrelated to the brand
Twitter, a micro-blogging service, is one of the fastest-growing social media that is changing the ways organizations communicate and build relationship with their stakeholders. Launched in 2006, Twitter has grown exponentially worldwide and was estimated at 75 million user accounts at the end of 2009, according to RJMetrics.com. In the United States, Twitter had 27.3 million unique visitors to its web site as of February 2010, according to Quancast.com. Public relations professionals and marketers see the growing popular Twitter community as a golden opportunity to establish and maintain relationships with various publics and stakeholders as well as networking, building credibility, trust and commitment among their “followers.” However, casual observations of many organizations’ Twitter accounts could have revealed that Twitter was often used to provide product or service information, or even to sell, in a one-way communication manner—an uncharacteristic nature of social media.
This study examines how three Fortune 100 companies (Ford, Home Depot and State Farm) used Twitter to engage with their publics to build and/or maintain relationships with them. The three companies were chosen based on their high s of engagement and influence values determined by two online analytic tools—Klout and Tweet Level. Using Hon and Grunig’s organization-public relationship as a conceptual foundation, this study examines the companies’ “tweets” to determine the extent to which they engaged with their “followers” to build trust, satisfaction and commitment.
Contents to be analyzed include a) Type of Tweets (retweet, reply, status updates); b) Categories (customer service, announcement, tips, conversation, other); c) Content message (question, response, reach out, follow up, appreciation, compliment, information, seek participation, other); and d) Mechanics (tweets with picture, video, hashtag, emoticons).
Overall, the majority (81%) of 507 collected tweets were replies or addressed to another Twitter user. Almost 13 percent were general status updates and about 6% were retweets. Half of the tweets (49.9%) were engaged in general conversations, followed by customer service (23.9%), and announcement (20.7%). Only a handful of tweets (6 out of 507) gave tips or how-to information.
Further, 23.5% of all tweets were information related, about 16% of tweets expressed appreciation or thanks to the followers, and 13.6% were answers to followers’ inquiries. Almost 16% of tweets fell into “Other” category as they pertained to miscellaneous topics.
A major aspect of effective public relations is developing relationships with publics.