WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 30 | 31 || 33 | 34 |   ...   | 39 |

«A Resource Guide for Parents and Teens Developed and Compiled by the Youth Council of the DuPage Workforce Board A Letter to Parents: Your teen’s ...»

-- [ Page 32 ] --

If women in particular in science and engineering occupations are aware that gender bias exists in these fields, it may allow them to fortify themselves. When they encounter dislike from their peers, it may be helpful to know that they are not alone. Despite how it feels, the social disapproval is not personal, and women can counteract it.

–  –  –

AAUW 96 Bibliography AAUW. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education, by C. Corbett, C. Hill, & A. St. Rose. Washington, DC: Author.

AAUW Educational Foundation. (2007). Behind the pay gap, by J. G. Dey & C. Hill.

Washington, DC: Author.

Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. (2001, September). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 12(5), 385–90.

American Psychological Association. (1991). In the Supreme Court of the United States:

Price Waterhouse v. Ann B. Hopkins: Amiens curiae brief for the American Psychological Association. American Psychologist, 46, 1061–70.

American Society for Quality. (2009). Engineering image problem could fuel shortage.

Milwaukee, WI: Author. Retrieved December 23, 2009, from www.asq.org/ media-room/press-releases/2009/20090122-engineering-image.html.

Andreescu, T., Gallian, J. A., Kane, J. M., & Mertz, J. E. (2008). Cross-cultural analysis of students with exceptional talent in mathematical problem solving. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 55(10), 1248–60.

Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–25.

Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance:

A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20(5-6), 327–44.

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–31.

Bentley, J. T., & Adamson, R. (2003). Gender differences in the careers of academic scientists and engineers: A literature review (NSF 03-322). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–63.

Blascovich, J., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D., & Steele, C. (2001). African-Americans and high blood pressure: The role of stereotype threat. Psychological Science, 12(3), 225–29.

Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369–75.

Brody, L. E., & Mills, C. J. (2005). Talent search research: What have we learned? High Ability Studies, 16(1), 97–111.

97 Why So Few?

Buck, G. A., Plano Clark, V. L., Leslie-Pelecky, D., Lu, Y., & Cerda-Lizarraga, P. (2008).

Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach. Science Education, 92(4), 688–707.

Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M., & Barnett, S. M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science:

Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 218–61.

Cohoon, J. M., & Aspray, W. (2006). A critical review of the research on women’s participation in postsecondary computing education. In J. M. Cohoon & W. Aspray (Eds.), Women and information technology: Research on under-representation (pp. 137–79).

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cooper, S. E., & Robinson, D. A. G. (1991). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy beliefs to mathematics anxiety and performance. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 24(1), 4–11.

Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments.

American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730.

———. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations.

American Sociological Review, 69(1), 93–113.

Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2009, June). Communal goals as inhibitors of STEM careers. Poster presented at the National Science Foundation Joint Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.

Di Fabio, N. M., Brandi, C., & Frehill, L. M. (2008). Professional women and minorities: A total human resources data compendium. Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.

Dweck, C. (2006). Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In S. J. Ceci & W. M.

Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 47–55). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

———. (2008). Mindsets and math/science achievement. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York, Institute for Advanced Study, Commission on Mathematics and Science Education.

Dweck, C., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–73.

Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices:





Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609.

———. ( 2006). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more

women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199–210). Washington, DC:

American Psychological Association.

98 AAUW Eccles (Parsons), J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Perspective on achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

Eisenhart, M. (2008, October). We can’t get there from here: High school girls consider engineering.

Presentation for a Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) national webcast.

Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (1999). Intentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differences. Science Education, 83(1), 55–76.

Foschi, M. (1996). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 237–54.

Fouad, N. A., & Walker, C. M. (2005). Cultural influences on responses to items on the Strong Interest Inventory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 104–23.

Frehill, L. M., Brandi, C., Di Fabio, N., Keegan, K., & Hill, S. T. (2009, Summer). Women in engineering: A review of the 2008 literature. SWE Magazine, 55, 28–56.

Frehill, L. M., Di Fabio, N., Hill, S., Trager, K., & Buono, J. (2008, Summer). Women in engineering: A review of the 2007 literature. SWE Magazine, 54(3), 6–30.

Frizell, S., & Nave, F. (2008). A preliminary analysis of factors affecting the persistence of African-American females in engineering degree programs. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.

Gibbons, M. T. (2009, June). Engineering by the numbers. In Profiles of engineering and engineering technology colleges. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.

Ginther, D. K., & Kahn, S. (2006). Does science promote women? Evidence from academia 1973–2001 (NBER Working Paper W12691). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008). Problems in the pipeline: Stereotype threat and women’s achievement in high-level math courses. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(1), 17–28.

Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645–62.

Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2009). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Unpublished paper, Baruch College, Stanford University.

Goulden, M., Frasch, K., & Mason, M. A. (2009). Staying competitive: Patching America’s leaky pipeline in the sciences. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Center on Health, Economic, & Family Security, & The Center for American Progress.

99 Why So Few?

Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–53.

Guay, R. (1977). Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Rotations. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Research Foundation.

Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008, May 30). Culture, gender, and math.

Science, 320, 1164–65.

Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. NeuroImage, 25, 320–27.

Halpern, D. F., Aronson, J., Reimer, N., Simpkins, S., Star, J. R., & Wentzel, K. (2007).

Encouraging girls in math and science (NCER 2007-2003). Washington, DC: U.S.

Department of Education, National Center for Education Research.

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A.

(2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1–51.

Hanson, S. L. (2004). African American women in science: Experiences from high school through the post-secondary years and beyond. NWSA Journal, 16(1), 96–115.

Hartung, P. J., Porfeli, E. J., & Vondracek, F. W. (2005). Child vocational development: A review and reconsideration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(3), 385–419.

Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995, July 7). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45.

Heilman, M. E., & Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 81–92.

Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004). Penalties for success:

Reaction to women who succeed in male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–27.

Hewlett, S. A., Buck Luce, C., Servon, L. J., Sherbin, L., Shiller, P., Sosnovich, E., & Sumberg, K. (2008). The Athena Factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering and technology (Harvard Business Review Research Report). Boston: Harvard Business Publishing.

Higher Education Research Institute. (2007, January). Survey of the American freshman:

Special tabulations. Los Angeles, CA: Author.

Holmes, M. A., & O’Connell, S. (2003). Where are the women geoscience professors? Paper presented at the National Science Foundation, Association for Women Geoscientists, and Association for Women Geoscientists Foundation-sponsored workshop, Washington, DC.

Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008, July 25).

Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–95.

100 AAUW Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males.

Psychological Science, 11(5), 365–71.

Ivie, R., & Ray, K. N. (2005). Women in physics and astronomy, 2005 (AIP Publication Number R-430.02). College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics.

Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326–38.

Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle: Teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women’s math performance. Psychological Science, 16(3), 175–79.

Jozefowicz, D. M., Barber, B. L., & Eccles, J. S. (1993, March 28). Adolescent work-related values and beliefs: Gender differences and relation to occupational aspirations. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, New Orleans, LA.

Kimura, D. (2002). Sex hormones influence human cognitive pattern. Neuroendocrinology Letters, 23(Suppl. 4), 67–77.

Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593–641.

Kulis, S., Sicotte, D., & Collins, S. (2002). More than a pipeline problem: Labor supply constraints and gender stratification across academic science disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 43(6), 657–91.

Lacey, T. A., & Wright, B. (2009, November). Occupational employment projections to 2018.

Monthly Labor Review, 132(11), 82–123.

Lapan, R. T., Adams, A., Turner, S., & Hinkelman, J. M. (2000). Seventh graders’ vocational interest and efficacy expectation patterns. Journal of Career Development, 26(3), 215–29.

Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Larkin, K. C. (1986). Self-efficacy in the prediction of academic performance and perceived career options. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 33(3), 265–69.

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56(6), 1479–98.

Lovaglia, M. J., Lucas, J. W., Houser, J. A., Thye, S. R., & Markovsky, B. (1998). Status processes and mental ability test scores. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 195–228.

Low, K. S. D., Yoon, M., Roberts, B. W., & Rounds, J. (2005). The stability of vocational interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 713–37.

101 Why So Few?

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted: Implications for the math-science pipeline. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(2), 61–66.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 30 | 31 || 33 | 34 |   ...   | 39 |


Similar works:

«THREAT ANALYSIS REPORT DDoS’s Newest Minions: IoT Devices July 2016 F 5. C O M / L A B S 1 F5 LABS THREAT ANALYSIS REPORT DDoS’s Latest Minions: IoT Devices This report was written by F5 Labs in conjunction with Loryka. Table of Contents Table of Contents Table of Figures DDoS is Commonplace What’s New? IoT devices are the latest minions in cyber weaponry toolkits The Interest is High Hunting for IoT devices with default passwords SSH brute force attack numbers and trends Telnet brute...»

«PPP Mainstreaming – Solar Park Energy Department, Government of Karnataka Pre-Feasibility Report (Draft for discussion & finalization) Submitted By Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India Private Limited June 2012 1 Pre-Feasibility Report PPP Mainstreaming – Solar Park June 2012 Energy Department, Government of Karnataka Disclaimer This document is strictly private and confidential and has been prepared by Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu India Private Limited (“DTTIPL”) specifically for the...»

«Teachers may use a variety of strategies for understanding and dealing with difficult behavior. Strategies for Dealing with Difficult Behavior Sally L. Kuhlenschmidt, Lois E. Layne We may imagine ourselves to be sage professors with rapt students hanging on our every word; however, the reality of classroom life may be very different. All faculty are confronted with students who engage in behaviors that are disruptive to the educational process. Students may be late for class, leave early, talk...»

«Information technologies for newspaper publishing in Asia and the Pacific Edited by Belinda Hopkinson C o m m u n i c a t i o n a n d d e ve l o p m e n t s e r i e s UNESCO Publishing Also in the Communication and Development Series: A Richer Vision: The Development of Ethnic Minority Media in Western Democracies Media and Democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean Information technologies for newspaper publishing in Asia and the Pacific Edited by Belinda Hopkinson C o m m u n i c a t i o n...»

«click for previous page 1116 Bony Fishes EXOCOETIDAE Flyingfishes by N.V. Parin, Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russia (after Gibbs, 1978) D iagnostic characters: Small to medium-sized (to 45 cm total length) with elongate, broadly cylindrical (round or elliptical in cross-section) bodies, flattend ventrally in some species. Head short; snout usually blunt (produced in Fodiator only), shorter than eye in all western Atlantic species. Mouth small; jaw teeth absent or very small. Gill rakers...»

«P rking ape 152 Wo r fondation pour les études et recherches sur le développement international cies May Dev 2016 elo p me n t P oli Financial needs and tools for agricultural development and transformation pertinent to low-income, food-insecure countries Alexandros Sarris CETTE PUBLICATION A BÉNÉFICIÉ D’UNE AIDE DE L’ÉTAT FRANCAIS GÉRÉE PAR L’ANR AU TITRE DU PROGRAMME «INVESTISSEMENTS D’AVENIR» Alexandros Sarris is Professor of development and trade economics at the...»

«IONIA COUNTY RECREATION PLAN 2014-2018 PREPARED BY: IONIA COUNTY BERTHA BROCK PARK ADVISORY BOARD WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE WEST MICHIGAN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Community Description 2 Administrative Structure 4 Ionia County Board of Commissioners 4 Bertha Brock Advisory Board 4 Budget 5 School Districts 6 Ionia County Communities 6 Staff and Volunteers 6 Recreation Inventory 7 Ionia County Parks 7 Bertha Brock Park 7 Green View Point Park 10 Un-named...»

«Slip Op. 14 85 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE :GOLDEN DRAGON PRECISE COPPER : TUBE GROUP, INC.; HONG KONG GD : TRADING CO., LTD.; GOLDEN : DRAGON HOLDING (HONG KONG) : INTERNATIONAL, LTD.; and : GD COPPER (U.S.A.) INC., : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Before: R. Kenton Musgrave, Senior Judge : UNITED STATES, : Consol. Court No. 14-00116 : Defendant, : : and : : CERRO FLOW PRODS., LLC; WIELAND : COPPER PRODUCTS, LLC; MUELLER : COPPER TUBE PRODUCTS, INC; and : MUELLER COPPER TUBE CO., INC.,...»

«TWENTY-EIGHTH ASIAN-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING ISSUES CONFERENCE PROGRAM SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 6 12:00 p.m. 5:00 p.m. GENERAL REGISTRATION Salon Prefunction 6:00 p.m. 8:00 p.m. WELCOME RECEPTION Salon Prefunction Welcome Remarks: Ali Peyvandi, Conference Chairman, Asian-Pacific Conference on International Accounting Issues, U.S.A. Lynnette Zelezny, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, California State University, Fresno, U.S.A. MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7 8:00 a.m. 5:00 p.m....»

«DEPARTMENT OF EARTH SCIENCES PART III PROJECT – 2016 TIME SCALE FOR CHOICE Students are asked to complete and return the attached form indicating their provisional three choices of project in order of priority by: Friday 5 February 2016 Students will appreciate that there is likely to be some sorting out in allocating topics.SPECIFICATION The specification for the Part III project is given on the Department website; Teaching section. PROJECTS Where projects involve a significant amount of...»

«REGLAMENTO DE LA CORTE DE ARBITRAJE Y MEDIACIÓN DE VALENCIA PREÁMBULO: Cuando entre dos o más personas existe una controversia, puede solucionarse por ellas mismas mediante la transacción o la intervención judicial. Nuestro ordenamiento jurídico posibilita a las partes para que sometan las diferencias a la decisión o Laudo de los árbitros, que deberá cumplirse porque, previamente y con carácter voluntario, se han sometido a él. Mediante la institución del arbitraje, los árbitros,...»

«Submitted on: June 1, 2013 My Tree House – World’s 1st Green Library for Kids Lin Li-Soh Central Public Library, National Library Board, Singapore Lin_Li_SOH@nlb.gov.sg Wan Ni-Lo Central Public Library, National Library Board, Singapore Wan_Ni_LO@nlb.gov.sg Copyright © 2013 by Lin Li Soh and Wan Ni Lo. This work is made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Abstract: The National Library Board,...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.