WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 2 | 3 || 5 | 6 |   ...   | 29 |

«BACKSTAGE, FRONTSTAGE INTERACTIONS: EVERYDAY RACIAL EVENTS AND WHITE COLLEGE STUDENTS By LESLIE A. HOUTS A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE ...»

-- [ Page 4 ] --

Most obviously, as a student, researcher, and teacher in a college environment, I am constantly surrounded by college students, who make a convenient sample. College students can be easily encouraged to participate in research: Who else could I convince to keep a daily or weekly journal for 3 or 4 months for free or for “points” (a commodity meaningless outside of academia)? I tried to convince some of my friends, family members, and colleagues to keep a journal, and even a few professors promised to keep a journal, but ultimately it was the college students who I could depend on to participate.

A second, more important reason why college students are studied in this project is because they represent a critical population demographically in racial studies. Whites who are often stereotyped to be racist include the “Archie Bunker” country bumpkins who typically represent older, rural males in the working class, without higher education.

If we could map a stereotypical white racist, with the “greater than sign” facing the more racist individual, it would probably look like this: older younger; rural urban; no higher education college educated; working/lower classes upper/middle classes; male female. Although there is little validity to these stereotypes, it seems appropriate to study a group of people who appear to be more on the “nonracist” end of a racist continuum.

–  –  –

I began collecting data in Spring 2002 at a large southeast university, in an Independent Study of Racial Relations course, sponsored by Dr. Joe Feagin. The journal writings of these ten students helped to launch a national data collection process that began Summer 2002. Although I continue to collect data, the dissertation findings examine the journals collected from Spring 2002 to Summer 2003.

Starting in Summer 2002, I recruited undergraduate students to keep a regular journal of “everyday” interactions that they participate in (or observe via participant observation) that reveal racial issues. Students were recruited through my and my committee chairperson’s contacts of instructors across the country who are teaching lower- or upper-division undergraduate or graduate-level courses in disciplines where student journal writing might be expected (such as social science or humanities disciplines). The instructors I contacted were encouraged to invite their colleagues to participate in the study of student journal writing, hence beginning a snowball technique of gathering a larger sample size (Warren 2002). An aggressive effort was made to get journals from the four major areas of the U.S. (Southeast, Northeast, Midwest, and West).

Upon approval from the instructors to solicit students to keep a daily/weekly journal, each faculty member decided how the student journal writing would be used in the class (such as a course assignment or extra credit). Such decisions impacted for how long the students were asked to keep a journal, and the length required of each journal entry to merit credit, if any was offered. Most students wrote an average of one to two paragraphs per journal entry, although the length ranged from a short phrase to five pages per entry.

Of the 23 instructors who had their students participate in the project, some faculty members asked their students to write for a specified amount of time (anywhere from 2 weeks to an entire 20-week semester) consecutively, no matter what the content of the journals entailed. In the journal instructions, I discussed the notion that “no data are data” so the students would recognize the benefits of writing even on “no race” days.

More often, the students were asked to write a certain number of journals (usually 10 to

20) that included a racial event in each account. Allowing each faculty member to decide how they wanted to frame the journal writing process provided me with a nice mixture to compare accounts. For example, one of the more common themes students wrote about regarding racial events was sports, specifically whites as spectators to football or basketball games. It might be tempting to conclude that every sports interaction would invoke a racial comment, yet with the inclusion of students who wrote daily, I could readily see multiple examples of students watching sports (sometimes the same game) with no racial comment made.

The journal assignment for most students was an extra credit opportunity.

Approximately 3 professors required the assignment of their students, and one professor extended the project allowing her students to choose which structure of privilege/oppression (such as gender, sexuality, age, social class, or dis/ability) they wanted to write about. Obviously this study includes only her students who wrote about race.

I provided each faculty member with the appropriate number of journal instructions for each student. Although the journal instructions were a lengthy 5 pages long, I tried to make it detailed, yet clear for the students, such as including sections like, “When should I write [in my journal]?” and “How will I be graded?” I also included 6 examples of journals written by students in the Spring 2002 Independent Study, so the students could see the preferred format of describing their accounts.

In the journal instructions, students were advised to document and analyze racial interactions, accounts, events, and racial comments. Instructors gave their students my detailed instructions regarding what and how to write in their journals, including journal examples. [See Appendix A for the journal instructions.] Students were also instructed to be unobtrusive in their research techniques. The Informed Consent, signed by each





student who participated in the project, summarizes the student expectations:

You will be asked to keep a journal of your reactions to everyday conversations about racial issues, images, and understandings. You will be instructed about unobtrusive research techniques so that the person you write about in your journal will not be aware that they are being studied. You will be instructed to be detailed in your accounts, yet to ensure anonymity, you will be instructed to conceal all identities (even your own) and to disguise all names and identifiers of persons you write about. Even though there will be no identifying markers in the journal, please keep your journal in a safe, private space so that it is not read by others. In your journal, you will be asked to emphasize your reactions and perceptions to these everyday events. You will have the opportunity to meet regularly with your professor to ensure all your questions and concerns are answered… Unlike other research projects that rely on journals or participant observation (see Myers and Williamson, 2001), I did not define for the students what constituted a “racial issue.” The instructions of what is a “racial issue, image, and understandings” are purposively vague, so that the students may determine for themselves what embodied a racial event.

On the last page of the journal instructions was a cover sheet that the students were to attach to their journals. On the cover sheet, students were asked to write their name, gender, race, age, sexual orientation (optional), and any comments to me. My email and telephone number were listed on the cover sheet and in the journal instructions, in the event that students wished to contact me. Students were also invited to include their contact information in the event that they wished to be contacted about their journals.

All students who participated in the journal writing activity and who agreed to share their journals with me for the dissertation project were instructed to sign an IRB Informed Consent form. Students had the option of participating in the journal writing assignment for their class, but not signing an IRB Informed Consent form, in which case their journals were not used or analyzed for the project, ensuring voluntary participation.

In other words, even if each individual instructor made the journal writing assignment mandatory for their course grade, students were still given the choice whether or not to participate in the study, with no penalty for their decision. Each instructor was encouraged to collect their students’ journals themselves, and then send them to me.

Only 1 instructor had their students submit their journals directly to me, and student participation was not high for that course. Upon receiving the student journals from the instructor, I encouraged each instructor to complete an “exit interview” questionnaire [provided in Appendix B].

–  –  –

After securing the appropriate consent forms from each journal collected, I followed general qualitative research procedures (Gubrium and Holstein 1997; Silverman

2000) as well as those specifically developed by pioneering analysts (Feagin, Vera and Imani 1996; Myers and Williamson 2001) to systematically and rigorously analyze the data collected. Most of the students submitted a typed paper copy, and journals were painstakingly scanned or typed into an electronic format. The electronic versions allowed me to more readily systematically code and recode the journal entries for prevalent themes.

Extended Case Method The study utilizes an alternative to grounded theory (Glaser and Strauss 1967), the extended or iterative case method (Burawoy et al. 1991). An iterative, recursive case method constantly uses the cases (data) collected to reexamine the prior conceptual view.

This process repeats itself, developing a deeper and more nuance view of the conceptual or theoretical starting point with each added step. The initial view is tested, refined, and sometimes rejected, as additional cases and accounts are examined, until a point that reasonably exhausts the issue at hand.

In grounded theory, data are examined inductively, whereby the analysis is not set up to confirm or disconfirm specific hypotheses. In the extended case method, categories that emerge from the data were compared to pre-existing theoretical frameworks (such as Goffman’s dramaturgical analysis of the frontstage and backstage) as a means to verify, extend, or reconstruct existing theories of racial issues and development. My project attempts to extend, confirm, reorganize, or reject key ideas of the existing orientation.

According to Burawoy (1991: 279), “The extended case method looks for specific macro determination in the micro world…It seeks generalization through reconstructing existing generalization, that is, the reconstruction of existing theory.” As an example, the current conceptual approach emphasizes a dichotomy between the “frontstage” and “backstage.” Based on my research presented in Chapters 5 and 6, I theorize that conceptualizing racial events along these discrete categories may be too simplistic as there are many underlying dimensions at work in the backstage. The backstage may be better understood as a fluid category allowing for slippage between the front and backstage. There are moments when the backstage becomes frontstage, or vice versa, such as when the relational dimensions change (for whites with the presence or absence of a person of color). The backstage therefore may not be a homogenous arena, as there are varying levels of privateness and publicness to the backstage. With the extended case method, analysis begins with themes in which data are constantly and rigorously coded and re-coded as a means to extend, confirm or reject existing conceptual ideas. This reciprocal, or cybernetic, process offers the potential to develop new ideas using the concepts of previous studies.

Coding Coding was ongoing throughout analyzing the journals to ensure that insights, data connections, and new categories of data are constantly being improved. I read through each journal account multiple times as the project evolved, careful to note prevalent themes and categories. The journals were categorized on at least 4 separate occasions.

First, as an initial read-through to get a sense of the prevalent themes the students were writing about. Second, as I “cleaned” (typing or scanning the journals into an electronic format) the data, I created categorical headings for each journal account. Up to this point in the research process, the data were organized regionally by each instructor. The third coding process took place when I sorted the data into common topics. Next I bundled common groups into prevalent themes, such as “how’s” versus “what’s.” Finally, the data were double-checked to ensure the logic of each categorization.

The accounts of all white students in my sample were read, coded, and analyzed for prevalent themes. With a very large sample size, I had to make decisions about which accounts to include for analysis and exemplify in the chapters. When deciding which accounts to examine, I paid particular attention to more substantial accounts that provided detailed analysis, narrative linkages, informative stories, and a situated context. I also included accounts that occurred frequently, or on a regular basis across the students.

Within my data, there are plenty of striking accounts. My dissertation examines some of the “extraordinary” narratives, but I also seek to pay attention to mundane accounts that reveal whites’ racial thinking in everyday activities.

Fragmentary comments, such as simplistic journal entries like, “I heard a racist comment today” were not included in the analysis. For example, the following account

written by a white male (WM) in the Southeast would not be used in the analysis:

Today one of my friends made a racist comment, “All niggers are like apples; they look good hanging from the trees.” I was very offended by the remark. I was extremely upset because I have great relationships with so many members of my team that happen to be black. So I was furious and told him to keep that kind of stuff to himself. (Ted, WM, Southeast) Although this account is startling in revealing a racial joke, the student did not include the context in which the offensive comment is made. For example, we are left not knowing the race of his friend, when he said it, where the conversation took place (on the field? at a party? in a dorm room?), who else was involved in the conversation, how it was said, and what the friend’s reaction was to his comment to “keep that kind of stuff to himself.” In selecting which accounts to analyze, I was looking for some level of detailed analysis to be able to contextualize the comment.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 2 | 3 || 5 | 6 |   ...   | 29 |


Similar works:

«136 Christian Symbolism in Sarah Orne Jewett’s “A White Heron” Victoria Freivogel Victoria is an English teacher at Lewis Central High School in Council Bluffs, IA. “A White Heron” by Sarah Orne Jewett follows the journey of Sylvia, a nine-year-old girl who, for the price of ten dollars, must make a decision between betraying the whereabouts of a white heron’s nest to an ornithologist who wants to kill and stuff the bird or keeping silent, allowing the heron to remain a free...»

«School of Accounting and Finance AFM 101: Introduction to Financial Accounting Fall 2012 Course Syllabus Course Instructors: Name: Duane Kennedy Donna Psutka Vishal Baloria Office: HH 383G HH 3162 HH 177C Phone: 519-888-4567 ext. 35987 519-888-4752 519-888-4567 ext. 36914 E-mail vbaloria@uwaterloo.ca dkennedy@uwaterloo.ca dpsutka@uwaterloo.ca Office hours: 11:30-1:30 MW or by appt. 1:30-3:00 MW or by appt. 1:30-3:00 MW or by appt. Course Administrator: Name: Humberto Gutierrez HH 3rd floor...»

«Qualities of an Effective English Language Teacher (EELT) from Students’ Point of view Roya Zamani1, Saeideh Ahangari*2 1, 2. Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran *Corresponding author: Ahangari@iaut.ac.ir Received: 2015.11.17 Revisions received: 2016.3.17 Accepted: 2016.7.17 Abstract Crucial roles of teachers may affect students‟ attitudes and motivations to language learning. To improve the field of foreign language teaching and learning we need to...»

«NZTA Drama: Road safety Year 9 and 10 Lesson Plans Lesson plans selected from learning experiences in the NZTA Drama unit plan. Context: This series of lessons allow students to meet achievement objectives at Level 5 of The Arts to help students develop conceptual understanding around creating works and responding to the works of others, in the context of messages about road safety. http://education.nzta.govt.nz/resources/secondary-school-curriculum-resources NOTE: Teachers should be aware that...»

«ISSN: 2320-9038 Volume 2, Issue 1 (2014) G.J. B. S. S Guru Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences Volume 2 Issue 1 Volume 2 Issue 1 (Jan – Mar, 2014) Editor Jayan, C Manikandan K ISSN: 2320-9038 www.gjbss.org Locus of Control, Assertiveness and General Well-Being among Alcoholics and Non-Alcoholics Indu S. Menon* & Monsy Edward** *Guest Lecturer, Department of Psychology, Prajyoti Niketan College, Kerala **Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, Prajyoti Niketan College, Kerala...»

«Home Educators’ 1 Resource Packet Dear Home-Educating Parents, I commend you on the endeavor of home-educating your children. It will take hard work and commitment, but so does anything worthwhile. As with any educational choice there will be times that are more challenging then others, hang in there and think long haul. There is no utopia, as it is homeschooling.not Heaven. However, it’ still a great choice for parents who know they are capable of directing their child’s education and...»

«JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING VOL. 37, NO. 8, PP. 871±889 (2000) The Culture of Power and Science Education: Learning from Miguel Angela Calabrese Barton,1 Kimberley Yang2 The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York Received 26 January 1999; accepted 28 April 2000 Abstract: In this paper we begin a discussion around the need for science educators to understand the relationship between cultural and socioeconomic issues and...»

«PROSPECTUS OF Non-Stipendiary Ph.D. PROGRAMME IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION (Inter-disciplinary) Part-time/ Full time NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNICAL TEACHERS’ TRAINING AND RESEARCH, (Established by the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India) Taramani, Chennai – 600 113. Telephone Nos.: (044) – 2254 5400 / 2254 5415 Fax: (044) – 2254 1126 E-mail: dir@nitttrc.ac.in / director@nitttrc.ac.in Website: http://www.nitttrc.ac.in September 2015 Table of Contents Page S....»

«A BRIEF HISTORY OF TANGO MONASTERY Tshenyid Lopen Kuenleg * I pay obeisance to the wrathful Hayagriva, in whose form is assembled the prajna (transcendental wisdom) of body, speech, and mind of all the Buddhas. The key of the sacred place is here, so that it may open the door of faith to myself and to others. The history of Tango (rTa-mgo) Monastery will be related here in three parts: 1. How great and important the sacred place is, including an eulogy. 2. How the successive great saints came...»

«DOCUMENT RESUME ED 310 102 SP 031 415 AUTHOR Wilen, William W., Ed. TITLE Questions, Questioning Techniques, and Effective Teaching. INSTITUTION National Education Association, Washington, D.C. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8106-1485-5 PUB DATE $ &: NOTE 201p. AVAILABLE FROM NEA Professional Library, P.O. Box 509, West Haven, ACT 06516 ($15.95 soft coverISBN-0-8106-1485-5: $29.95 clothISBN-0-8106-1484-7). PUB TYPE Guides Classroom Use Guides (For Teachers) (052) Books (010) EDRS PRICE MFO1 Plus Postage. PC...»

«Does Student Sorting Invalidate Value-Added Models of Teacher Effectiveness? An Extended Analysis of the Rothstein Critique Cory Koedel University of Missouri Julian R. Betts* University of California, San Diego National Bureau of Economic Research July 2009 Value-added modeling continues to gain traction as a tool for measuring teacher performance. However, recent research (Rothstein, 2009a, 2009b) questions the validity of the value-added approach by showing that it does not mitigate...»

«PERCEPTIONS OF ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER AMONG MARSHALLESE TEACHERS AND PARENTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI’I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF EDUCATION IN EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY AUGUST 2004 By Brenda M. Smith Thesis Committee: Marie Iding, Chairperson Rhonda Black Daniel Blaine ii We certify that we have read this thesis and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.