«Journal of Information Technology Education: Research Volume 13, 2014 Cite as: Mac Callum, K., Jeffrey, L., & Kinshuk. (2014). Factors impacting ...»
The research strongly indicates the role of support needed for lecturers to successfully implement mobile learning into the classroom. Support is needed in terms of supporting general literacy. In particular, support is needed to help teachers with the technology and supporting them to effectively integrate it into the teaching environment.
This research has added to and clarified the existing literature into mobile learning. In particular, it recognizes the role that lecturers play in the future acceptance of mobile learning. It shows that the factors that influence lecturers’ adoption of mobile learning may differ from those of their students and therefore need to be considered when implementing mobile technology into the teaching environment.
In general, though these factors have been explored in other studies, gauging ICT adoption, there have been a limited number of studies specifically looking at mobile learning adoption by lecturers. The measures adopted in this study focus on existing variables, such as digital literacy, ICT anxiety and ICT teaching self-efficiency, to a context of mobile learning. This however may limit the study’s findings, in general, since the variables adopted are ICT focused, rather mobile specific. Despite this however, the study has been able to confirm the role of perceived ease of use and usefulness on the acceptance of mobile learning. However, results have indicated that mobile learning adoption is influenced by some of the same factors that influence adoption of other technologies in the classroom. The findings indicate that mobile technology may not be too dissimilar to other technology adoption in education. However, a different approach may be needed when introducing mobile technology to lectures. Specifically, if mobile learning is to be introduced into the classroom, teachers need to first have a good foundation in general computing. The need to scaffold technologies is seen as very important to successful introduction of mobile learning.
ReferencesAgarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M. (2000). Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy-an empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876 Akour, H. (2009). Determinants of mobile learning acceptance: An empirical investigation in higher education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses database. (UMI No.
AAT 3408682) Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Albion, P. R. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 321-347. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/8368 Aubusson, P., Schuck, S., & Burden, K. (2009). Mobile learning for teacher professional learning: Benefits, obstacles and issues. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 17(3), 233-247.
doi:10.1080/09687760903247641 Balash, F., Yong, Z. & bin Abu, B. (2011). Lecturers and educational technology: Factors affecting educational technology adoption in teaching. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Management Technology. IPEDR, 13. IACSIT Press, Singapore
Mac Callum, Jeffrey, & Kinshuk
Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample:
Testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(1), 1-15. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00049-9 Beckers, J. J., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). The influence of computer anxiety on experienced computer users while performing complex computer tasks. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 456-466. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.09.011 Beckers, J. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2003). Computer experience and computer anxiety. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(6), 785-797. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00005-0 Beckers, J. J., Wicherts, J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2007). Computer anxiety: "Trait" or "state"? Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2851-2862. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.06.001 Buabeng-Andoh, C. (2012). Factors influencing teachers’ adoption and integration of information and communication technology into teaching: A review of the literature. International Journal of Education & Development using Information & Communication Technology, 8(1).
Chang, S. C., & Tung, F. C. (2008). An empirical investigation of students’ behavioral intentions to use the online learning course websites. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 71-83.
Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 210-237. doi:10.2307/249690 Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., Huang, S.-X., & Wu, T.-T. (2008). A knowledge engineering approach to developing e-libraries for mobile learning. The Electronic Library, 26(3), 303 - 317.
doi:0.1108/02640470810879464 Cowan, B. R., & Jack, M. A. (2011). Exploring the wiki user experience: The effects of training spaces on novice user usability and anxiety towards wiki editing. Interacting with Computers, 23(2), 117-128.
doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2010.11.002 Cox, M., Preston, C., & Cox, K. (1999, September). What factors support or prevent teachers from using ICT in their classrooms? Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Sussex, Brighton. Retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00001304.htm Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 9-340. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/pss/249008 Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132. doi:10.1111/j.1559tb00945.x Dellinger, A. B., Bobbett, J. J., Olivier, D. F., & Ellett, C. D. (2008). Measuring teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS-Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 751-766.
doi:10.1016/j.tate.2007.02.010 Dillon, A. (2001). User acceptance of information technology. In W. Karwowski (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human factors and ergonomics. London: Taylor and Francis.
Donaldson, R. L. (2011). Student acceptance of mobile learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida State University, USA. Retrieved from http://www.rdonaldson.com/wpcontent/uploads/2011/05/Donaldson_R_Dissertation_2011.pdf Duncan-Howell, J., & Lee, K.-T. (2007). M-learning: Finding a place for mobile technologies within tertiary educational settings. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, A. Soong Swee Kit, & C. Cheers (Eds.), Ascilite 2007, 2-5 December 2005, Singapore. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/12323/ Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286-299. doi:10.1037/1040-35126.96.36.1996
Teachers’ Adoption of Mobile Learning
Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in is adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(1:8). Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vol1/iss1/8 Gibbs, C. (2003). Explaining effective teaching: Self-efficacy and thought control of action. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 4(2), 1-14. Retrieved from http://ojs.ml.unisa.edu.au/index.php/EDEQ/article/view/520 Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23, 4 519-529.
doi:10.1287/mksc.1040.0070 Hasan, B. (2003). The influence of specific computer experiences on computer self efficacy beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(4), 443-450. doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(02)00079-1 Hasan, B., & Ahmed, M. U. (2010). A path analysis of the impact of application-specific perceptions of computer self-efficacy and anxiety on technology acceptance. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 22(3), 82-95. doi:10.4018/joeuc.2010070105 Hammond, M., Reynolds, L., & Ingram, J. (2011). How and why do student teachers use ICT? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(3), 191-203. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00389.x Hennessy, S., Ruthven, K., & Brindley, S. (2005). Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: Commitment, constraints, caution, and change. Journal of Curriculum Studies 37(2), 155doi:10.1080/0022027032000276961 Hoelter, D. R. (1983). The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices. Sociological Methods and Research, 11, 325–344. doi: 10.1177/0049124183011003003 Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6 (1), 53-60.
Huang, J.-H., Lin, Y.-R., & Chuang, S.-T. (2007). Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: A perspective of the extended technology acceptance model. Electronic Library, The, 25(5), 585 - 598.
doi:10.1108/02640470710829569 Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and the gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 2823-2837.
doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.007 Jeffrey, L., Hegarty, B., Kelly, O., Penman, M., Coburn, D., & McDonald, J. (2011) Developing digital information literacy in higher education: Obstacles and supports. Journal of Information Technology Education. 10, 383-413. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol10/JITEv10p383Jeffrey1019.pdf Kebritchi, M. (2010). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of educational computer games: A case study.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 256-270.
Kennedy, G., Dalgarno, B., Bennett, S., Judd, T., Gray, K. & Chang, R. (2008, December). Immigrants and natives: Investigating differences between staff and students’ use of technology. Paper presented at the Ascilite 2008, Melbourne Kidwell, B., & Jewell, R. D. (2008). The influence of past behavior on behavioral intent: An informationprocessing explanation. Psychology and Marketing, 25(12), 1151-1166. doi:10.1002/mar.20258
Lefoe, G., Olney, I. W., Wright, R., & Herrington, A. (2009). Faculty development for new technologies:
Putting mobile learning in the hands of the teachers. In J. Herrington, A. Herrington, J. Mantei, I. Olney & B. Ferry (Eds.), New technologies, new pedagogies: Mobile learning in higher education. Wollongong, Australia: University of Wollongong.
Lim, C. P., & Khine, M. S. (2006). Managing teachers’ barriers to ICT integration in Singapore schools.
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 97-125. 97-125. Chesapeake, VA: SITE.
Mac Callum, Jeffrey, & Kinshuk
Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & Education, 54(2), 600-610. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009 Little, T., Cunningham, W., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 151doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1 Lu, X., & Viehland, D. (2008, December). Factors influencing the adoption of mobile learning. Paper presented at the 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Christchurch.
Mac Callum, K. (2010). Attitudes of educators to the introduction of mobile technology. Paper presented at the 1st annual conference of Computing and Information Technology Research and Education New Zealand (CITRENZ2010), Dunedin, New Zealand.
Mac Callum, K., & Jeffrey, L. (2013). The influence of students’ ICT skills and their adoption of mobile learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(3), 303-314.
Madigan, E. M., Goodfellow, M., & Stone, J. A. (2007). Gender, perceptions, and reality: Technological literacy among first-year students. SIGCSE Bulletin, 39(1), 410-414. doi:10.1145/1227504.1227453 Markauskaite, L. (2007). Exploring the structure of trainee teachers’ ICT literacy: The main components of, and relationships between, general cognitive and technical capabilities. Education Technology Research Development, 55(6), 547-572. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9043-8 Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523-1537. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003 Mulaik, S. A., & Millsap, R. E. (2000). Doing the four-step right. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(1), 36-73. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0701_02 Nunan, D., & Wong, L. (2005). Innovation and change: Information technology and inservice teacher education. In C. Davison (Ed.), Information technology and innovation in language education (pp. 195Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Pianfetti, E. (2001). Focus on research: Teachers and technology: Digital literacy through professional development. Language Arts, 78(3), 255-262.
Parayitam, S., Desai, K. J., Desai, M. S., & Eason, M. K. (2010) Computer attitude as a moderator in the relationship between computer anxiety, satisfaction, and stress. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 345-352. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.005 Plallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual (3rd ed.). Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin.
Phelps, R., & Ellis, A. (2002, July). A metacognitive approach to computer education for teachers: Combining theory and practice for computer capability. Paper presented at the Linking learners: Australian Computers in Education Conference (ACEC 2002), Hobart, Tasmania.