WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 16 | 17 || 19 | 20 |   ...   | 26 |

«UNDERSTANDING EMPLOYEES’ BEHAVIORAL REACTIONS TO AGGRESSION IN ORGANIZATIONS by MARIE S. MITCHELL B.S., George Mason University, 1993 M.A.H.R., ...»

-- [ Page 18 ] --

Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. 1998. Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal of Management, 24(3): 391-419.

Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. 2005. Aggression in the workplace: A social-psychological

perspective. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior:

Investigations of actors and targets: 13-40.

Neuman, J. H., & Keashly, L. 2003. Workplace bullying: Persistent patterns of workplace aggression. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL. Unpublished manuscript.

O’Reilly, C. A., & Caldwell, D. F. 1985. The impact of normative social influence and cohesiveness on task perceptions and attitudes: A social information processing approach. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58: 193-206.

Paulhus, D. L. 1991. Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. Shaver, & L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of psychology and social psychological attitudes: 17

–  –  –

Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Wegner, J. A. 2001. When workers flout convention: A preliminary study of workplace incivility. Human Relations, 54: 1387-1420.

Perrowe, P. L., & Spector, P. E. 2002. Personality research in the organizational sciences. In K.

M. Rowland, & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management: 1-63. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. 2003. Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5): 879-903.

Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. 1990. Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs. In B.

Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture: 5-39. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. 1998. Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work

groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41:

658-672.

Rosen, S. 1983. Perceived inadequacy and help-seeking. In b. M. DePaulo, A. Nadler, & J. D.

Fisher (Eds.), New directions in helping: Help-seeking (Vol. 2): 73-107. San Diego, CA:

–  –  –

Rothbaum, F. M., Weisz, J. R., & Synder, S. S. 1982. Changing the world and changing the self:

A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social

–  –  –

Rusbult, C. E., Farrell, D., Rogers, G., & Mainous, A. G., III. 1988. Impact of exchange variables on exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect: An integrative model of responses to declining job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3): 599-627.

Salancik, G. J., & Pfeffer, J. 1978. A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 224-253.

Schat, A. C. H., Desmarais, S., & Kelloway, E. K. 2005. The Workplace Aggression Questionnaire (WAQ): Validation of a Measure of Exposure to Aggression at Work.

Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Honolulu, HA. Unpublished

–  –  –

Sears, R. R. 1948. Non-aggressive reactions to frustration. Psychological Review, 48: 337-342.

Seligman, M. E. P. 1975. Helplessness: On depression, development and death. San Francisco:

–  –  –

Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. 1997. Retaliation in the workplace: The role of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 434-443.

Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. 2004. Broadening our understanding of organizational retaliatory behavior. In R. W. Griffin & A. M. O’Leary-Kelly (Eds.), The dark side of organizational behavior: 373-402. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Spector, P. E. 1987. Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72: 438-443.

Spielberger, C. D. 1996. State-trait anger expression inventory, research edition: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Spielberger, C. D., Krasner, S. S., & Solomon, E. P. 1988. The experience expression, and control of anger. In M. P. Janisse (Ed.), Health psychology: Individual differences and stress: 89-108. New York: Springer Verlag.

Taylor, S. P., Schmutte, G. T., & Leonard, K. E. 1977. Physical aggression as a function of alcohol and frustration. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 9: 217-218.

Tedeschi, J. T., & Bond, M. H. 2001. Aversive behavior and aggression in cultural perspective.

In R. Kowalski (Ed.), Behaving badly: Aversive behaviors in interpersonal relationships: 257-293. Washington, DC: APA.

Tedeschi, J. T. & Felson, R. B. 1994. Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington,

–  –  –

Tepper, B. J. 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 178-190.

Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Henle, C. A. in press. Procedural injustice, victim-precipitation, and abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology.





Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M. K., & Shaw, J. D. 2001. Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5): 974-983.

Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Giacalone, R. A., & Taylor, E. C. 2004. Subordinates’ responses to

–  –  –

of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA. Unpublished manuscript.

Terhune, K. W. 1968. Motives, situation, and interpersonal conflict within prisoner’s dilemma.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monographs, 8(3): 2.

Thibault, J., & Kelley, H. 1965. The social psychology of groups (2nd Ed.). New York: Wiley.

Thoits, P. A. 1994. Stressors and problem-solving: The individual as psychological activist.

Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 35(2): 143-160.

Tripp, T.M. & Bies, R.J. 1997. What’s good about revenge: The avenger’s perspective. In R. J.

Lewicki, R.J. Bies, & B.H. Sheppard (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 6): 145-160. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Turner, R. J., & Roszell, P. 1994. Psychological resources and the stress process. In W. R.

Avison & I. H. Gotlib (Eds.), Stress and mental health: Contemporary issues and prospects for the future. New York: Plenum.

–  –  –

Understanding Responses to Aggression: An Experimental Investigation of Personality and Fear of Retaliation on Aggressive and Non-Aggressive Behaviors Today’s workplace is often portrayed as an arduous and harsh reality, particularly given the rise in media coverage of aggressive acts at work (Stone, 1995; Stuart, 1992). Some even argue that incidents of workplace aggression are as commonplace as car accidents (Stussie, 2002). It appears these sentiments are not entirely unfounded. A study by Pinkerton of Fortune 1000 companies suggests workplace aggression is the leading security threat facing corporate America today (Security, 2001). According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM; 2005) a major reason for this security threat is that aggression is never completely preventable and threatens the physical and psychological safety of organizational members. For example, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) reported more than 1,000 workplace homicides occur annually and 12% of non-fatal violent crimes resulted in the injuries to victims (Warchol, 1998). However, workplace aggression does not only involve violence (or physical assault).

According to the BJS, of the 9 million accounts of workplace aggression reported between the years 1992 and 1996, 6 million were non-violent incidents (e.g., verbal attacks, threats, intimidation) (BJS, 1998).

Although considerable efforts have been made to understand workplace aggression, less attention has been given to identifying specific reactions to aggression. We know much about factors that intensify aggression at work (see Baron, 2004 and Neuman & Baron, 1998 for reviews). We also know much of the different types of aggression individuals engage in at work (see Neuman & Baron, 2005 for a review). However, we know far less about how individuals react to aggression and what influences those reactions. Aggression researchers suggest aggressive reactions are normal and instinctual reaction, and therefore aggression is a likely response to aggression (e.g., Lorenz, 1966; Geen, 1990). Still, we also know that individuals do not always react aggressively; some even react constructively (e.g., Keashly, Trott, & MacLean, 1994; Tepper, Duffy, & Shaw, 2001).

Aggression researchers contend that characteristics of the situation and the individual perceiving the act influence reactions to aggression (e.g., Anderson & Bushman, 2002; Baron, 2004). For example, Baron (2004) argues reactions depend on restraining factors of the situation, like fear of future punishments or retaliation from the harmdoer. Further, aggression research has identified a number of personality traits that influence individuals’ reactions to aggression (e.g., trait anger, locus of control) (see Anderson & Bushman, 2002 for a review).

Therefore, in order to understand reactions to aggression and what causes an individual to react aggressively or non-aggressively, it is important to consider factors that might influence those reactions.

The purpose of this paper is to investigate behavioral reactions to perceived aggression.

In particular, I investigate what makes individuals react aggressively or non-aggressively to perceived aggression. In doing so, I explore factors that aggression researchers suggest influence aggressive and non-aggressive reactions to aggression. Specifically, I investigate the moderating effects of fear of retaliation, trait anger, locus of control, and need for social approval.

–  –  –

Aggression theorists argue that aggression involves “any form of behavior directed toward the goal of harming or injuring another living being who is motivated to avoid such treatment” (Baron & Richardson, 1994: 7). One defining characteristic of aggression is that it is behavior driven by motives to harm the target. Intention to harm, however, is not something that can be easily observed, but is more or less inferred from the behavior itself (Geen, 1990).

Tedeschi and colleagues (Brown & Tedeschi, 1976; Tedeschi & Bond, 2001) argue that acts are considered aggression when an observer “attributes harmful intentions” about the behavior (Tedeschi & Bond, 2001: 258). Therefore, aggression is defined by the recipient of the behavior.

Thus, in the context of understanding reactions to aggression, taking the recipient or victim’s point of view is particularly important. Simply put, individuals who do not believe they are intentionally harmed will not perceive the act as aggression and, therefore, may not react.

Even if the offender intends to harm the victim, if the victim does not perceive the behavior as intentionally harmful, the behavior may not elicit a response. Consequently, the offender’s intention is irrelevant. Should the victim respond to behavior that is not perceived to be intentionally harmful, whatever reactions that do occur are not in response to aggression. Only behavior that is perceived to be intentionally harmful by the victim are considered aggression, and only behaviors that the victim perceives as aggression can stimulate a response to aggression. Therefore, in this study, I consider only behaviors that the victim believes were carried out with the intention to inflict harm.

–  –  –

There is considerable research evidence that suggests aggression promotes the instigation of aggression (see Anderson & Bushman, 2002 and Berkowitz, 1998 for reviews). In fact, some argue that interpersonal aggression is the most important single instigator of human aggression (e.g., Berkowitz, 1993; Geen, 1990). Berkowitz (1993, 1998) contends that aggression promotes affective reactions, and when emotions involve anger, fight responses are triggered (i.e., aggression). Tedeschi and Felson (1994) argue that individuals react to aggression with aggression in order to stop further attacks. Essentially, they argue that aggressive reactions attempt to punish the harmdoer, thereby preventing future attacks against the initial victim.

Indeed, research provides support for this notion (e.g., Axelrod, 1984; Bies & Tripp, 1998).

Workplace aggression researchers argue that aggressive reactions to aggression can also seek to “make the wrongdoer pay” for the harm befallen the victim (e.g., Bies, 2001; Bies & Tripp, 1996; Folger & Skarlicki, 1998). For example, Bies and colleagues (Aquino, Tripp, & Bies, 2001; Bies & Tripp, 1996, 1998) argue that when individuals are mistreated they may engage in revenge, defined as “an action in response to some perceived harm or wrongdoing by another party that is intended to inflict damage, injury, discomfort, or punishment on the party judged responsible” (Aquino et al., 2001: 53). Similarly, Skarlicki and Folger (2005) contend retaliation may occur to “even the score” or “get back at” the harmdoer.

Workplace aggression research provides evidence that aggression instigates retaliatory reactions. For example, research shows perceived mistreatment positively influences retaliation (Skarlicki & Folger, 1997; Skarlicki, Folger, & Tesluk, 1999) and revenge (Bies & Tripp, 1996, 1998). More specifically, Aquino et al. (2001) found that when individuals felt the harmdoer was to blame for their mistreatment, they sought revenge. These results suggest that acts perceived to be intentionally harmful promote retaliatory behavior. From this research, Jones (2003) sought to investigate aggression (reactions that intend to inflict harm) as a response to mistreatment. He found that individuals differentiate the source of the harm with their reactions and specifically and intentionally target aggression toward source of the mistreatment.



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 16 | 17 || 19 | 20 |   ...   | 26 |


Similar works:

«K-12 Valentine’s Chapel There was excitement in the air (arctic blast cold air!) today as we all met for our annual K-12 Valentine’s Day Chapel or as some have coined it, our Chapel of Love. As has become a tradition, the lower school children gave Valentine’s Day cards to their Upper School buddies, who escorted all of the children to the gym. As a special treat, the kindergartners processed hand-in-hand with the seniors at the beginning of the chapel. My personal highlight was watching...»

«Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.6, No.6, 2015 Guidelines on How to Read a Physics Textbook and the Assessment of the Readability of Recommended Physics Textbooks in Secondary Schools in Osun State of Nigeria Akinyemi Olufunminiyi Akinbobola Department of Special Education and Curriculum Studies, Adeyemi College of Education, Ondo, Nigeria akinbobola2006@yahoo.com Abstract This study assessed the readability of the four...»

«PAULA POUNDSTONE Biography Appearing on stage with a stool, a microphone, and a can of Diet Pepsi, PAULA POUNDSTONE is famous for her razor-sharp wit and spontaneity. The Boston Globe said, “Poundstone improvises with a crowd like a Jazz musician.swinging in unexpected directions without a plan, without a net.” Paula is so quick and unassuming that audience members at her live shows often leave complaining that their cheeks hurt from laughter and debating whether the random people she...»

«JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING VOL. 37, NO. 8, PP. 871±889 (2000) The Culture of Power and Science Education: Learning from Miguel Angela Calabrese Barton,1 Kimberley Yang2 The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York Received 26 January 1999; accepted 28 April 2000 Abstract: In this paper we begin a discussion around the need for science educators to understand the relationship between cultural and socioeconomic issues and...»

«Revised 03/12 Curriculum Vitae Elizabeth Griffiths Rutgers University Phone: 973.353.3303 School of Criminal Justice Fax: 973.353.5896 Center for Law and Justice Email: elizabeth.griffiths@rutgers.edu 123 Washington Street Newark, NJ 07102 Academic Appointments 2011-present Assistant Professor, School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University. 2006-2011 Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, Emory University. 2005-2006 Instructor, Department of Sociology, Emory University. Education 2007....»

«  “Theory to practice in simulation: preventing and handling a difficult  debriefing”  Abstract: Background. The debriefing of a clinical simulation session is difficult when instructors or learners perceive the occurrence of an obstacle that has hindered the learning process. Objectives and method. Based on a Nominal Group Technique involving the authors of this article, this project aimed at drawing up and proposing informed recommendations for preventing and handling a...»

«J.B. Brebner and Some Recent Trends in Eighteenth-Century Maritime Historiography G. A. Rawlyk Winthrop Pickard Bell Professor of Maritime Studies Mount Allison University, 1987-1988 Professor of History, Queen's University J.B. Brebner, in so many ways, was a remarkable historian. Born in Toronto in 1895, he did his graduate work at Oxford and Columbia, and after teaching at the University of Toronto from 1921 to 1925 he went to Columbia where he spent the rest of his academic career.1 He was...»

«Krishna Bista 2-31Walker Hall School of Education University of Louisiana at Monroe I. EDUCATION Arkansas State University, Jonesboro Campus, Arkansas (USA) Doctorate in Education (EdD), Educational Leadership/Higher Education, 2013 Specialist in Education (EdS), College Teaching/Community College Administration, 2012 Troy University, Troy Campus, Alabama (USA) Master of Science (MS), Post-Secondary Education and English, 2009 Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu (Nepal) Master of Arts (MA), English...»

«By Robert Herndon Illustrated by Sherry Byrd Author’s Note: This story presents a character and situations that persons on the Autism Spectrum can identify with, and a window on the world of someone with Asperger’s (or with an attachment disorder) that can enlighten the neurotypical reader. About half of the children on the Spectrum that I have worked with over my 30 years in the mental health field have desired friends but have struggled with making and keeping them. The story is fictional...»

«Welcome to the 2013 AIMS Conference! We are glad you have chosen to attend and appreciate the opportunity to offer this professional development and networking forum for our colleagues from across the state and the country. The AIMS Teachers Service Committee has been hard at work planning and organizing this event to ensure its success and on behalf of the AIMS community, I cannot thank them enough. Committee members’ investments have been invaluable and we thank their respective schools,...»

«Maury Messenger Home of the Cougars the Monthly Newsletter of the Parent / Teacher Association June 2016 Maury Students Hit the Yellow Brick Road By Nathaniel Rogers WHAT’S INSIDE The Polite Piggy's Musical was a rousMaury Students Hit the Yeling success! On Wednesday, May 25, low Brick Road 1 and Friday May 27, some of our after school students came together to Catch the Summer Reading show off our rendition of The Wizard Bug 2 of Oz. This production had some International Fulbright...»

«A PROBLEM-SOLUTION PROJECT Overview and Rationale for the Project The teaching/learning experience that you are about to review is the first-person narrative of a first-year, fourth grade teacher in an urban school district on the southside of Atlanta, Georgia. Mrs. Burnley, the teacher, is a young, white female teacher who is pursuing an advanced degree in Early Childhood Education at Georgia State University. In the school where she teachers, ninety-seven percent (97%) of the students are...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.