WWW.DISSERTATION.XLIBX.INFO
FREE ELECTRONIC LIBRARY - Dissertations, online materials
 
<< HOME
CONTACTS



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 10 | 11 || 13 | 14 |   ...   | 56 |

«Annick Hedlund-de Witt Worldviews and the transformation to sustainable societies An exploration of the cultural and psychological dimensions of our ...»

-- [ Page 12 ] --

Finally, he created the soul of the world, placed that soul in the center of the world's body and diffused it in every direction. Having been created as a perfect, self-sufficient, and intelligent being, “the world he brought into being was a blessed God" (ibid, p. 58). The Kosmos itself was thus regarded as a living, divine being, animated by the same principle or substance that brought life to the 56 animals within it—the anima mundi, the living soul of the universe (Inwood, 2005 (1995)-a). This ancient idea recently resonated in the scientific Gaia hypothesis of James Lovelock, which proposes the entire world as one vast, living, selfregulating organism—a notion embraced by several strands in contemporary environmental thought (Hay, 2002). In his account, Plato portrays the universe as a purposively constructed and beautifully arranged cosmos, in which the macrocosm is analogous to the microcosm. Human morality was based on this cosmic order, which was revealed in the visible architecture of the heavens. The Timaeus thus lays out a cosmology in which a metaphysical Theory of Forms is integrated with a general physical theory (Cornford, 2000 (1973)).

As Tarnas (1991) notes:

While for other contemporary cultures the heavens remained, like the overall world view, principally a mythological phenomenon, for the Greeks the heavens became linked as well to geometrical constructions and physical explanations, which in turn became basic components of their evolving cosmology. The Greeks thereby bestowed to the West a tradition which demanded that a cosmology not only must satisfy the human need to exist in a meaningful universe—a need already served by the archaic mythological systems—but must also delineate a coherent physical and mathematical structure of the universe accounting for detailed systematic observations of the heavens (pp. 49-50).

Both ‘science’ and ‘philosophy’ were thus vital constituents of the Greek cosmology. Complementary to the mythical approach and worldview, these first philosophers and scientists considered the world thus also intelligible in a rational way, and the human being, with his higher intellectual faculties, well prepared to understand that world (Boersema, 2001). As Taylor (1989) emphasizes, reason in this context is understood as the capacity to see the order that is there, that is, to be ruled by the correct vision or understanding: “Reason reaches its fullness in the vision of the larger order, which is also the vision of the Good” (p. 123). Precisely because of the order reigning over all—the universal, moral laws that connected the celestial with the terrestrial realms, and humanity with the larger world—the human being was considered to be able to 57 understand and have knowledge of the world. The belief that the universe is governed according to a comprehensive regulating intelligence, and that this same intelligence is reflected in the human mind, rendering it capable of knowing the cosmic order, was characteristic of Hellenic thought (Tarnas, 1991). So although there is in this conception a clear differentiation between the self and things, there is also a correspondence between mind and world (Brague, 2003)—an assumption that would be critically questioned, about two thousand years later, by Immanuel Kant.

–  –  –

would be translated into the English ‘worldview.’ He did this in his Kritik der Urtheilskraft (Critique of Judgment), published in 1790, in a “quintessential Kantian paragraph that accents the power of the perception of the human mind” (Naugle, 2002, p. 58). Or, in other words, in a paragraph that shifted the

balance from the world to its viewer:

–  –  –

29 In Kant’s words: „Das gegebene Unendliche aber dennoch ohne Widerspruch auch nur denken zu können, dazu wird ein Vermögen, das selbst übersinnlich ist, im menschlichen Gemüthe erfordert. Denn nur durch dieses und dessen Idee eines Noumenous, welches selbst keine Anschauung verstattet, aber doch der Weltanschauung, als bloßer Erscheinung, zum Substrat untergelegt wird, wird das Unendliche der Sinnenwelt in der reinen intellectuele Größenschäßung unter einem Begriffe ganz zusammengefaßt, obzwar es in der 58 Kant speaks here of the attempt of human reason to form a comprehensive outlook on the totality of empirical things. That is, he articulates the relationship between the human subject and the objects surrounding him, into a framework of understanding: a Weltanschauung. That outlook explicitly is a total view, covering ‘everything.’ He also states that this outlook, comprehending the infinite sensible world into a non-contradictory whole, itself can only be supersensible, and therefore no conclusions can be drawn from it about the noumenon: the universe and the connections between things in themselves (Ritter, Gründer, & Gabriel, 2004, p. 453). This is called Kant’s transcendental Idealism: the idea that the mind constitutes the known universe because we can only know things within the framework of our own creation (Allison, 2005 (1995)). With that, Kant elevates the human mind, because it is the power and magnitude of the human mind that is able to creatively organize the infinite, contradicting and often chaotic world of sense into a comprehensive and orderly whole (Naugle, 2002).





Although Kant used the term Weltanschauung only once, it is, in retrospect, not surprising that the history of this central concept starts with his ‘Copernican Revolution in philosophy’—which was profoundly influenced by the startling and in many ways disorienting discoveries of the scientific revolution. In the words of Tarnas (1991), “as Copernicus had explained the perceived movement of the heavens by the actual movement of the observer, so Kant explained the perceived order of the world by the actual order of the observer” (p. 347). In a response to the conflicting, but in themselves convincing, claims from natural science and skeptical philosophy, Kant introduced the notion of the a priori structures of the mind—such as space, time, and causality. These a priori forms and categories of understanding shape the noumenon (das Ding an sich), or the world in itself, into the phenomenon, the world as it appears to the human subject (Reill & Wilson, 2004). The world natural

science describes is therefore a world ordered by the mind’s cognitive apparatus:

man knows reality precisely to the extent that reality conforms to the structures of his mind, and causality and the necessary laws of science are thus built into the framework of his cognition, his Weltanschauung. The mind does not conform mathematischen durch Zahlenbegriffe nie ganz gedacht werden kann“ (see Kant, 1968 (1790)).

–  –  –

We could say that rationality is no longer defined substantively, in terms of the order of being, but rather procedurally, in terms of the standards by which we construct orders in science and life. For Plato, to be rational we have to be right about the order of things. For Descartes rationality means thinking according to certain canons. The judgment now turns on the properties of the activity of thinking rather than on the substantive beliefs that emerge from it (p. 156).

This revealed an essential hierarchy and division in the world: rational man knows his own awareness to be certain, and entirely distinct from the external world of material substance, which is epistemologically less certain and perceptible only as object (Tarnas, 1991, p. 277). This resulted in the Cartesian dualism—between human and nature, consciousness and matter, subject and object, mind and body—that much green literature has identified as ultimately responsible for the current ecological malaise (Hay, 2002; Plumwood, 1993).

This ‘turn to the subject’ necessitated the objectification of the world, or, in Max Weber’s famous term, “the disenchantment of the world” (die Entzauberung der Welt). According to Taylor (1989), “we could also call it neutralizing the cosmos, because the cosmos is no longer seen as the embodiment of a meaningful order 60 which can define the good for us. … We demystify the cosmos as a setter of ends by grasping it mechanistically and functionally as a domain of possible means” (p. 149). This differentiation between subjective self and objective world generated a new notion of individual independence and emancipation, because “the disengaged subject is an independent being, in the sense that his or her paradigm purposes are to be found within, and not dictated by the larger order of which he or she is part” (pp. 192-193).

By his differentiation between noumenon and phenomenon and his assertion that we cannot have knowledge of the world in itself, Kant affirms Descartes’ ontological cleft between res cogitans (thinking substance; subject) and res extensa (extended substance; object), even as he complexifies it. The immediate consequence of Kant’s limitation of knowledge was that it virtually ruled out traditional metaphysics (Allison, 2005 (1995)). While science could claim certain knowledge of appearances, it could no longer claim knowledge over all of reality. And it is precisely this differentiation that allowed Kant to reconcile scientific determinism with religious belief and moral freedom: science and religion described different worlds and were thus no longer in contradiction.

By restricting science to appearances, room is left for morality with respect to things in themselves. Though everything in the realm of appearance, including human action, is causally determined, it remains conceivable that human beings, considered as noumena, are free. The project of justifying morality for Kant thus turned crucially on the establishment of our noumenal freedom (Allison, 2005 (1995)). Kant thereby initiates a more radical notion of freedom: “The moral law is what comes from within; it can no longer be defined by any external order.

But it is not defined by the impulse of nature in me either, but only by the nature of reasoning, by, one might say, the procedures of practical reasoning….” (C.

Taylor, 1989, p. 364). Therefore, rational beings have a unique dignity. In contrast with everything else in nature, which conforms to laws blindly, rational beings are potentially free and self-determining.

From its coinage in Kant, the term ‘Weltanschauung’ evolved quickly and the term prospered in the following decades, especially under the influence of a number of key thinkers mostly in the German Idealist and Romantic traditions (Ritter et al., 2004). By the century’s midpoint, Weltanschauung had infiltrated a number of other disciplines, and started to penetrate other

–  –  –

immensely popular, and by its end it had made its way into virtually every speech community in the Western world, either as a loan translation (‘worldview’) or a loanword (‘weltanschauung’), or in both ways, as in the English language (Wolters, 1989).

2.3.3 Goethe’s ‘Lebenswelt’ Although he is not a philosopher in the formal sense, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749-1832) is an interesting figure for the history of worldviews. With his Naturphilosophie he articulated an alternative to the dominant worldview and science of his days, which still resonates within environmental thought. Goethe is often considered as part of the Romantic Movement, which can be seen as the first broad expression of an ecological impulse (Hay, 2002). With Goethe, the concept of Weltanschauung evolved into the capacity of the individual—who is formed by personal, embodied experience, and is thus not a transcendental subject, as with Kant—to constitute, give shape to, his own experiential life world, or Lebenswelt (Ritter et al., 2004). With that, Goethe prepared for the individualizing of the worldview concept. In his view, each individual develops a conception of the world in accordance with his own potential and requirements.

As Simmel (2007) remarks about Goethe’s thought:

This is shown most clearly by a statement that is initially a self-confession

but announces, quite generally, his thought on knowledge acquisition:

“Had I not already carried the world within me through its anticipation, I would have remained blind while seeing, and all research and experience would have been nothing more than a lifeless and vain effort.” Here it is thus not just the form but the whole of existence, the unity of form and content, which in a mysterious way, are derived from within (p. 169).

Although it may appear as if this ‘within’ through which Goethe feels enabled to see the world resembles Kant’s a priori principles, Kant’s structures are alienated from the world in itself (which they do not give access to), while for Goethe this inner experience, especially in its more pure and mature form, is an expression of the world in itself, of Nature. For him, cognition is an immediate, 62 organic function of Leben, the divine life of Nature, which is adequate and true to the extent to which it arises from the unitary ground and the mode of being in the world of this very Leben (Goethe, 1950 (1782)). Both Kant and Goethe tried to rescue the integrity of the moral. However, while Kant proposes a radical break with nature (which is part of the phenomenal domain described by deterministic science), Goethe and the Romantics propose that morality is “to be discovered in the élan of nature itself, from which we have cut ourselves off” (C.

Taylor, 1989, p. 382). As Tarnas (1991) observes, In Goethe’s vision, nature permeates everything, including the human mind and imagination. Hence nature’s truth does not exist as something independent and objective, but is revealed in the very act of human cognition. The human spirit does not simply impose its order on nature, as Kant thought. Rather, nature’s spirit brought forth its own order through man, who is the organ of nature’s self-revelation (p. 378).



Pages:     | 1 |   ...   | 10 | 11 || 13 | 14 |   ...   | 56 |


Similar works:

«ODYSSEY OFTHE MIND SPONTANEOUS PROBLEM SOLVING SPONTANEOUS PROBLEMS Verbal Hands -On Hands -On Verbal VERBAL In a Verbal spontaneous problem, the team is given a brainstorming-type problem to solve in a specific amount of time and scored according to he number and creativity of responses generated. The order in which members respond is usually random, and a higher point value is awarded for a creative answer than a common one. Examples: Name uses for a jack-o-lantern after Halloween. Name...»

«ÉTUDES ROMANES DE BRNO 35, 1, 2014 SAMUEL BIDAUD SUR LES SIGNIFIES DES MOTS ITALIENS CHE ET COSA Introduction Si elle est aujourd’hui très largement utilisée dans la linguistique francophone, la psychomécanique du langage est reçue de façon inégale à l’étranger. Si l’on excepte les travaux de quelques linguistes comme Alvaro Rochetti, Louis Begioni, Alberto Martone, Alberto Manco, Roberto Silvi ou Sophie Saffi, et le fait que les Principes de linguistique théorique et Temps et...»

«Citation: Horton, Matthew, Read, Janet, Fitton, Daniel, Toth, Nicola and Little, Linda (2012) Too Cool at School – Understanding Cool Teenagers. PsychNology, 10 (2). pp. 7391. ISSN 1720-7525 Published by: PsychNology Journal URL: http://www.psychnology.org/File/PNJ10(2)/PSYCHNOLOGY_JOURNAL_10_2_HORTO N.pdf This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/10923/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to...»

«• HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION Behavioral and mood disturbances: May Include euphoria, insomnia, mood These highlights do not include all the information needed to use Flo-Pred swings, personality changes, severe depression, and psychosis. Existing safely and effectively. See full prescribing information for Flo-Pred. conditions may be aggravated. (5.5) • Decreases in bone density: Monitor bone density in patients receiving longFlo-Pred (prednisolone acetate) Suspension for Oral...»

«Begin Reading Table of Contents Copyright Page In accordance with the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, the scanning, uploading, and electronic sharing of any part of this book without the permission of the publisher constitute unlawful piracy and theft of the author’s intellectual property. If you would like to use material from the book (other than for review purposes), prior written permission must be obtained by contacting the publisher at permissions@hbgusa.com. Thank you for your support of...»

«Fools Die Mario Puzo Book I Chapter 1 “Listen to me. I will tell you the truth about a man’s life. I will tell you the truth about his love for women. That he never hates them. Already you think I’m on the wrong track. Stay with me. Really—I’m a master of magic. “Do you believe a man can truly love a woman and constantly betray her? Never mind physically, but betray her in his mind, in the very ‘poetry of his soul.’ Well, it’s not easy, but men do it all the time. “Do you...»

«CARLY MCMORRIS, PH.D. PROVISIONALLY REGISTERED PSYCHOLOGIST Calgary, Alberta, Canada Canadian Citizen Telephone: (403) 220-5457 Email: camcmorr@ucalgary.ca CURRENT POSITION Assistant Professor 2016 Werklund School of Education School and Applied Child Psychology Program University of Calgary Office: EDT 508; 2500 University Drive, NW Calgary, Alberta Canada T2N 1N4 Phone: 403-220-5457 EDUCATION Ph.D. in Clinical-Developmental Psychology 2009-2015 York University, Toronto, Ontario Dissertation:...»

«From Soulard’s Notebooks Assistant Editor: Kassandra Soulard Poetry by Ric Amante 1 Notes from New England [Commentary] by Raymond Soulard, Jr. 9 Poetry by Judih Haggai 27 Poetry by Joe Ciccone 32 Paelo Redemption [Travel Journal] by Charlie Beyer 35 Poetry by Joe Coleman 45 Baby Steps Up into the Sky [Travel Journal] by Nathan D. Horowitz 55 Many Musics [Poetry] by Raymond Soulard, Jr. 59 Psychedelics and Lucid Dreaming: Doorways in the Mind [Essay] by A.S. Kay 91 Poetry by Tom Sheehan 99...»

«1 Sociocultural Issues in Learning English for Women in Northwest Pakistan Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors Englische Philologie am Fachbereich Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften der Freien Universität Berlin vorgelegt von Sabina Shah Berlin, February, 2015 2 Erstgutachter/in: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Leitner (Institut für Englische Philologie) Zweitgutachter/in: Prof. Dr. Ferdinand von Mengden (Institut für Englische Philologie) Tag der Disputation: 14. Juli 2015 3 Contents...»

«The Cob Builders Handbook You Can Hand-Sculpt Your Own Home Table Of Contents:  Acknowledgements and Warning INTRODUCTION What is cob? Why build with cob?DESIGNING YOUR HOME SWEET HOME! Things to do to get ready Think Small Think Rounded Make the Most of the Climate Design with passive solar access in mind Other things to think about when designing One Story or More? Noise Plan for Future Additions Now Designing the Entrance Buttresses Permits CHOOSING YOUR SITE Here's a list of some things...»

«DISSERTATION Titel der Dissertation Ethics in Mind Ethiopian Journalism and Ethics Verfasser: Worke Hailemarkos Ayalew Angestrebter akademischer Titel Doktor der Philosophie (Dr. phil) Wien, im 2011 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 092 301 Matrikelnummer: a0749672 Dissertationsgebiet lt. Studienblatt: Publizistikund Kommunikationswissenschaften Betreuer; Univ.-Prof. Dr. Thomas A. Bauer II To Fiori (Eminet Hailemarkos Ayalew), my cute Daughter For all the joy with which you fill my life. III...»

«*** Free EBOOK*** Your Journey of Personal Transformation Begins HERE: An Introduction to Understanding Your Human Design Chart by Evelyn Levenson, MBA Certified Human Design Specialist Your Success By Design Coach Your Journey Begins HERE www.HumanDesignforSuccess.com This Report is for your personal use. You MAY SHARE it, in its entirety with all author and contact information. However, You May NOT Trade, Sell or Resell This Intellectual Property in Any Way. You may not reprint any part of it...»





 
<<  HOME   |    CONTACTS
2016 www.dissertation.xlibx.info - Dissertations, online materials

Materials of this site are available for review, all rights belong to their respective owners.
If you do not agree with the fact that your material is placed on this site, please, email us, we will within 1-2 business days delete him.